中国临床心理学杂志

学生生涯建构问卷的修订

单位：1. 北京师范大学心理学院北京 100875
2. 北方交通大学附属中学北京 100081
3. 北京师范大学附属实验中学北京 100032
4. 北京育英学校北京 100036
5. 北京市京源学校北京 100040

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2016,24(1):100-103

摘要：

目的:修订学生生涯建构问卷(Student Career Construction Inventory,SCCI),考察其在中国高中生群体中的信度和效度。方法:在北京四所中学收集有效数据1466份,并在两周后对其中的76人进行重测。结果:SCCI经过修订后包含22个条目4个维度,各条目与总分的相关在0.41到0.72之间,探索性和验证性因素分析均支持4维度的理论模型。四维度得分及总分与效标之间的相关均显著。总量表内部一致性信度和重测信度分别为0.92和0.90,四维度的内部一致性信度在0.76到0.82之间,重测信度在0.64到0.76之间。人口学变量差异检验显示女生在职业探索和生涯决策两维度的得分显著高于男生,高二年级的学生在职业探索维度上得分高于高一年级。结论:修订后的学生生涯建构问卷在中国高中生群体中具有良好的信效度,可以用于中国高中学生群体的研究。

Objective: To revise Student Career Construction Inventory(SCCI) in Chinese high school students.Methods: The study was conducted in 1466 high school students.Item analysis, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, criterion correlation and reliability analysis were used to test the reliability and validity of Student Career Construction Inventory.Results: Chinese form of SCCI had 22 items and 4 dimensions.Correlations of item scores with total score ranged from 0.41 to 0.72.Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis supported the hypothesized 4-factor model of SCCI.Scores of 4 dimensions and total score were significantly related to the criterion variables(ranging from 0.27 to 0.57).Re-liability coefficients of the four dimensions ranged from 0.76 to 0.82(0.92 for the total), and the test-retest reliability ranged from 0.64 to 0.76(0.90 for the total).Difference analysis in demographic variables indicated that the female scored higher than the male in occupational exploration and career decision-making;the second grade senior students scored higher than the first grade senior students in occupational exploration.Conclusion: The revised Chinese version of SCCI has sufficient reliability and validity in high school students.

基金项目：

"十二五"国家科技支撑计划项目(2012BAI36B00)

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 Savickas ML. Career construction theory and practice. In Brown SD, Lent RW. Career development and counseling:Putting theory and research to work(2nd edition). Hoboken, New Jersey:John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2013. 147-183
2 侯悍超,侯志瑾,杨菲菲. 叙事生涯咨询——生涯咨询的新模式. 中国临床心理学杂志,2014,22(3):555-559
3 Savickas ML. Career construction:A developmental theory of vocational behavior. In Brown D. Career Choice and Development(4th edition). San Francisco, California:Jossey-Bass, Inc, 2002. 149-205
4 Savickas ML, Porfeli EJ. Student Career Construction Inventory. from http://www.vocopher.com/ms/scci/SCCI_Master. pdf. 2011
5 Rocha M, Guimarães MI. Adaptation and psychometric properties of the student career construction inventory for a portguguese sample:Formative and reflective constructs. Psychological Reports, 2012, 111(3):845-869
6 Savickas ML. Career adaptability:An integrative construct for life-span, life-space theory. The Career Development Quarterly, 1997, 45:247-259
7 Hou ZJ, Leung, SA, Li X, et al. Career adapt-abilities scale-china form:Construction and initial validation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2012, 80(3):686-691
8 Porfeli EJ, Savickas, ML. Career adapt-abilities scale-USA form:Psychometric properties and relation to vocational identity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2012, 80(3):748-753
9 Savickas ML, Porfeli EJ. Revision of the career maturity inventory:The adaptability form. Journal of Career Assessment, 2011, 19(4):355-374
10 曲可佳,邹泓. 职业生涯探索的结构、方法及影响因素. 心理科学进展,2009,2:442-450
11 王才康,胡中锋,刘勇. 一般自我效能感量表的信度和效度研究. 应用心理学,2001,1:37-40
12 王长义,王大鹏,赵晓雯,等. 结构方程模型中拟合指数的运用与比较. 现代预防医学,2010,37(1):7-9
13 张焕. 中学生时间管理自我监控、未来时间洞察力与学业成绩的关系. 河南大学,2013
14 于凤杰,陈亮,张文新. 青少年早中期焦虑的发展及其与未来规划的关系:追踪研究. 中国临床心理学杂志,2013, 21(4):631-635
15 Creed PA, Patton W, Prideaux LA. Predicting change over time planning and career exploration for high school students. Journal of Adolescence, 2007, 30(3):377-392
16 张云龙,叶宝娟,罗照盛,等. 应对效能对大学生可就业能力的影响:职业探索的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2015,23(5):815-817
17 Flum H, Blustein DL. Reinvigorating the study of vocational exploration:A framework for research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2000, 56(03):380-404

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】