中国临床心理学杂志

中文形容词大五人格量表的初步编制Ⅲ:基于概化理论的视角

作者：罗杰¹ 2 戴晓阳³

单位：1. 贵州师范大学教育科学学院贵州省普通高校基础心理与认知神经科学特色重点实验室贵阳 550001
2. 内蒙古师范大学教育科学学院呼和浩特 010022
3. 深圳大学心理系深圳 518060

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2016,24(1):88-94

摘要：

目的:分别运用一元概化理论和多元概化理论考察《中文形容词大五人格量表(BFFP-CAS)》的测量学性能。方法:采用BFFP-CAS对707名在校大学生进行测试。结果:①UGT中各人格维度取5~6个因子可达到相应目的,概化系数和可靠性指数均达到较好水平,同等条件下BFFP-CAS更适合用作常模参照测验。②MGT中各次级特质的概化系数在0.65(温存)~0.88(抑郁)之间,可靠性指数在0.62(利他)~0.88(抑郁)之间,各人格维度的概化系数在0.90(宜人性)~0.93(神经质)之间,可靠性指数在0.89(宜人性)~0.92(神经质)之间;各人格维度中个别次级特质对全域总分方差的贡献比与编制量表时的赋值意图存在差异,后续修订工作中需注意对这些特质进行相应修正完善。结论:中文形容词大五人格量表各人格维度和特质分量表均有较好的测验精度和信度,可作为常模参照测验用于人格特质的评估。

Objective: This paper explored the psychometric properties of the Chinese Adjectives Scale of Big-Five Factor Personality(BFFP-CAS) base on the univariate generalizability theory(UGT) and multivariate generalizability theory(MGT).Methods: A total of 707 college students were surveyed with the BFFP-CAS.Results: According to the UGT, it is suitable to count 5~6 factors for each personality dimension, the generalizability coefficient and the index of dependability were excellent, and under the same conditions, the BFFP-CAS is more suitable to explain by the norm-referenced test.Ac-cording to the MGT, at the facet level, the generalizability coefficients ranged from 0.65(Tenderness) to 0.81(Depression), the index of dependability ranged from 0.62(Altruism) to 0.81(Depression), the facet factors also could be used for the normreferenced test.At the dimension level, the generalizability coefficients ranged from 0.90(Agreeableness) to 0.93(Neuroticism), and the index of dependability ranged from 0.89(Agreeableness) to 0.92(Neuroticism).The component proportion of some facet factors in each dimension was not good, which should be improved in the future.Conclusion: The measurement accuracy and reliability were excellent for each facet factor and each personality dimension, and this scale can be used for the norm-referenced test to assess the personality trait.

基金项目：

教育部哲学社会科学研究后期资助项目(14JHQ016);贵州省科学技术基金一般项目(黔科合J字[2015]2115号);贵州省教育厅自然科学研究项目(黔科合[2014]299号);贵州省高等学校教学内容和课程体系改革培育项目(黔教高发[2012]426号)

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 罗杰,戴晓阳. 人格测验中条目呈现方式与记分方式的效应初探. 中国临床心理学杂志,2015,23(2):236-241,255
2 罗杰,戴晓阳. 中文形容词大五人格量表的初步编制Ⅰ:理论框架与测验信度. 中国临床心理学杂志,2015,23(3):381-385
3 罗杰,戴晓阳. 中文形容词大五人格量表的初步编制Ⅱ:测验效度. 中国临床心理学杂志,2015,23(4):571-575
4 Shavelson RJ, Webb NM. Generalizability theory:A primer. In Jaeger RM. Measurement methods for the social sciences series. Sage Publications, INC, 1991
5 杨志明,张雷. 测评的概化理论及其应用. 北京:教育科学出版社,2002
6 Hoi KS, Pui WL. Classical versus Generalizability theory of measurement. Educational Measurement, 2007, 4:1-13
7 Brennan RL. Generalizability theory and classical test theory. Applied Measurement in Education, 2010, 24(1):1-21
8 Nubbaum A. Multivariate generalizability theory in educational measurement:An empirical study. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1984, 8(2):219-230
9 安哲峰,骆方,张厚粲. 多元概化理论在评定量表编制中的作用:以音像教材测评数据分析为例. 心理科学,2008, 31(5):1192-1194
10 Føllesdal H, Hagtvet KA. Emotional intelligence:The MSCEIT from the perspective of generalizability theory. Intelligence, 2009, 37(1):94-105
11 骆方,刘红云,张月. 应聘情境下作假识别量表的开发. 心理学报,2010,42(7):791-801
12 罗杰,戴晓阳. 大学生社会支持评定量表的概化分析. 中国临床心理学杂志,2011,19(2):181-183
13 孙颖,张慧,曹小燕. 基于概化理论的作假识别量表编制及其作用——以心理资本问卷中作假识别量表的编制为例. 心理与行为研究,2012,10(6):473-479

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】