中国临床心理学杂志

承诺与亲密伴侣暴力的关系研究

单位：1. 天津大学心理研究所天津 300072
2. 山西水利职业技术学院运城 044004

分类号：R395.6

出版年,卷(期):页码：2016,24(1):18-22

摘要：

目的:采用主-客体互倚模型的统计方法,探讨承诺和亲密伴侣暴力的关系。方法:采用投资模型量表中文版和冲突策略量表中文修订版对201对情侣进行施测,用SPSS16.0和Lisrel 8.80进行数据分析。结果:①男生和女生的承诺不存在显著差异;②女生的亲密伴侣暴力显著高于男生,具体为躯体攻击和心理攻击;③女生的承诺能负向预测自身的施暴行为,男生的承诺不能预测自身的施暴行为;④在控制了主体效应之后,女生的承诺能负向预测男生的施暴行为,男生的承诺能接近显著地正向预测女生的施暴行为。结论:恋爱中女生的承诺能显著降低与伴侣互动中的施暴行为(主体效应)和受虐行为(客体效应),男生的承诺对施暴行为的影响不显著(主体效应),对受虐行为的影响达到接近显著的水平(客体效应)。

Objective: To explore the relationship between commitment and intimate partner violence based on an Ac-tor-Partner Interdependence Model.Methods: The Investment Model Scale Chinese Revised(IMS-CR), and Revised Conflict Tactics Scales(CTS2) were administered to 201 dating couples, and SPSS 16.0 and Lisrel 8.80 were used to analyze the data.Results: ①There was no significant main effect of gender on commitment;②Females reported higher level of inti-mate partner violence than males, especially on physical assault and psychological aggression;③The commitment of females predicted their own violent behaviors negatively, while the commitment of males could not predict their own violent behaviors;④After controlling for the actor effect, the commitment of females could predict males' violent behaviors negatively, while the commitment of males marginally significantly predicted females' violent behaviors positively.Conclusion: The commitment of females in dating relationship can reduce their violent behaviors(actor effect) as well as abusive behaviors(partner effect), while the commitment of males may have influence on their abusive behaviors(partner effect), but not violent behaviors.

基金项目：

国家社会科学基金重点项目(14AZD111)

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 WHO. World report on violence and health. Geneva:WHO Press, 2002
2 García-Moreno C, Jansen HA, Ellsberg M, et al. WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence against women:Initial results on prevalence, health outcomes and women's responses. Geneva:WHO Press, 2005
3 Devries KM, Mak J, García-Moreno C, et al. The global prevalence of intimate partner violence against women. Science, 2013, 340(6140):1527-1528
4 Tang CS, Lai BP. A review of empirical literature on the prevalence and risk markers of male-on-female intimate partner violence in contemporary China, 1987-2006. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 2008, 13(1):10-28
5 Pornari CD, Dixon L, Humphreys GW. Systematically identifying implicit theories in male and female intimate partner violence perpetrators. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 2013, 18(5):496-505
6 Ali PA, Naylor PB. Intimate partner violence:A narrative review of the biological and psychological explanations for its causation. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 2013, 18(3):373-382
7 Archer J. Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners:A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 2000, 126(5):651-680
8 Dixon L, Graham-Kevan N. Understanding the nature and etiology of intimate partner violence and implications for practice and policy. Clinical Psychology Review, 2011, 31(7):1145-1155
9 刘娇,郑涌. 亲密关系暴力:男性与女性谁更具攻击性——国外相关研究评述. 妇女研究论丛,2004,2:64-68
10 Finkel EJ, Eckhardt CI. Intimate partner violence. In JA Simpson, L Campbell(Eds). The Oxford handbook of close relationships. New York:Oxford, 2013. 452-474
11 Finkel EJ, Dewall CN, Slotter EB, et al. Using I³ theory to clarify when dispositional aggressiveness predicts intimate partner violence perpetration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2012, 102(3):533-549
12 张迎黎,张亚林,何影,等. 几种常用家庭暴力评估工具介绍. 中国临床心理学杂志,2010,18(3):320-322
13 Finkel EJ. Impelling and inhibiting forces in the perpetration of intimate partner violence. Review of General Psychology, 2007, 11(2):193-207
14 Finkel EJ, Slotter EB. An I³ Theory analysis of human sex differences in aggression. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2009, 32(3-4):279
15 Finkel EJ. The I³ Model:Metatheory, theory, and evidence. In JM Olson, MP Zanna(Eds). Advances in Experimental Social Psychology,49. San Diego:Academic Press, 2014. 1-104
16 Rusbult CE, Van Lange P. Interdependence, interaction, and relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 2003, 54:351-375
17 Le B, Korn MS, Crockett EE, et al. Missing you maintains us:Missing a romantic partner, commitment, relationship maintenance, and physical infidelity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2011, 28(5):653-667
18 Slotter EB, Finkel EJ, Dewall CN, et al. Putting the brakes on aggression toward a romantic partner:The inhibitory influence of relationship commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2012, 102(2):291-305
19 Agnew CR, Van Lange PAM, Rusbult CE, et al. Cognitive interdependence:Commitment and the mental representation of close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998, 74(4):939-954
20 Le B, Agnew CR. Commitment and its theorized determinants:A meta-analysis of the Investment Model. Personal Relationships, 2003, 10(1):37-57
21 Arriaga XB, Agnew CR. Being committed:Affective, cognitive, and conative components of relationship commitment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2001, 27(9):1190-1203
22 Gonzalez-Mendez R, Hernandez-Cabrera JA. Play context, commitment, and dating violence:A structural equation model. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2009, 24(9):1518-1535
23 Gottman JM. Psychology and the study of marital processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 1998, 49:169-197
24 刘晓柳,胡蕾,贾茹,等. 夫妻依恋关系与主客体互倚模型. 精神医学杂志,2012,25(6):408-413
25 Kenny DA, Cook W. Partner effects in relationship research:Conceptual issues, analytic difficulties, and illustrations. Personal Relationships, 1999, 6(4):433-448
26 Cook WL, Kenny DA. The Actor-Partner Interdependence Model:A model of bidirectional effects in developmental studies. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 2005, 29(2):101-109
27 张锦涛,方晓义,戴丽琼. 夫妻沟通模式与婚姻质量的关系. 心理发展与教育,2009,2:109-115
28 侯娟,蔡蓉,方晓义. 夫妻依恋风格、婚姻归因与婚姻质量的关系. 应用心理学,2010,16(1):42-54
29 Ramirez Jr. A. An examination of the tripartite approach to commitment:An actor-partner interdependence model analysis of the effect of relational maintenance behavior. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2008, 25(6):943-965
30 Orth U. How large are actor and partner effects of personality on relationship satisfaction? The importance of controlling for shared method variance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2013, 39(10):1359-1372
31 张耀方,方晓义. 城市新婚夫妻求助表达、伴侣支持应对和婚姻满意度的关系. 中国临床心理学杂志,2011,19(4):496-498
32 Rusbult CE, Martz JM, Agnew CR. The investment model scale:Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 1998, 5(4):357-387
33 刘新春. 关系保持、承诺和亲密伴侣暴力:一项基于主-客体互倚模型的研究. 天津大学硕士论文,2014
34 Straus MA. Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence:The conflict tactics(CT) scales. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1979, 41(1):75-88
35 Straus MA, Hamby SL, Boney-Mccoy S, et al. The Revised Conflict Tactics Scales(CTS2) development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 1996, 17(3):283-316
36 Langhinrichsen-Rohling J. Top 10 greatest "hits":Important findings and future directions for intimate partner violence research. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2005, 20(1):108-118
37 Chan KL. Correlates of wife assault in Hong Kong Chinese families. Violence and Victims, 2004, 19(2):189-201
38 Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis:Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling:A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1999, 6(1):1-55
39 何影,张亚林,王纯,等. 大学生恋爱及恋爱暴力行为发生情况. 中国学校卫生,2012,33(10):1153-1155
40 Straus MA. Prevalence of violence against dating partners by male and female university students worldwide. Violence Against Women, 2004, 10(7):790-811
41 Chan KL, Straus MA, Brownridge DA, et al. Prevalence of dating partner violence and suicidal ideation among male and female university students worldwide. Journal of Midwifery and Women's Health, 2008, 53(6):529-537
42 王向贤. 大学生恋爱暴力初步调查——以某高校1035名大学生为例. 青年研究,2007,8:45-49
43 Weigel DJ, Ballard-Reisch DS. Relational maintenance, satisfaction, and commitment in marriages:An Actor-Partner Analysis. Journal of Family Communication, 2008, 8(3):212-229
44 Kaura SA, Lohman BJ. Does acceptability of violence impact the relationship between satisfaction, victimization, and commitment levels in emerging adult dating relationships? Journal of Family Violence, 2009, 24(6):349-359

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】