中国临床心理学杂志

投资模型量表中文版在中国未婚情侣中的信效度检验

作者：刘新春¹ 赵琳¹ 张乐乐² 杨丽¹

单位：1. 天津大学心理研究所天津300072
2. 山西水利职业技术学院运城044004

关键词：承诺亲密关系情侣

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2015,23(6):1020-1023

摘要：

目的:引进Rusbult等编制的投资模型量表,在中国未婚情侣中进行中文版修订和信效度检验。方法:采取整群取样的方法对374名恋爱关系持续一周以上的大三学生进行集体施测,选取承诺维度量表、双向适应量表、自尊量表和内控力、有势力的他人及机遇量表作为效度指标。结果:①量表四因素结构的拟合指数良好,χ²/df =3.29,RMSEA=0.078, SRMR=0.076, CFI=0.95, NFI=0.93, IFI=0.95;②与承诺维度量表和双向适应量表的相关系数绝对值在0.20~0.63之间(P <0.05),与自尊量表和归因方式量表基本不相关;③各个分量表的内部一致性系数在0.76~0.93之间。结论:修订后的投资模型量表中文版具有较好的信效度,可以作为亲密关系中承诺的测量工具。

Objective: To evaluate psychometric properties of Investment Model Scale in Chinese dating couples. Meth-ods: A sample of 374 junior undergraduates who are involved in a dating relationship at least for one week was administrat-ed the revised Investment Model Scale(IMS). Dimensions of Commitment Inventory, the Dyadic Adjustment Scale, the Self-Esteem Scale, and the Internality, Powerful Others, and Chance Scale were chosen as the criterion-related indicators. Re-sults: ①The revised IMS had four factors with good fit indices, χ²/df =3.29, RMSEA=0.078, SRMR=0.076, CFI=0.95, NFI= 0.93, IFI=0.95; ②The correlation analyses indicated that the revised IMS had good convergent validity that the absolute val-ue of the correlation coefficients ranged from 0.20 to 0.63(P <0.05), and good discriminant validity that it almost had no cor-relation with the criteria indicators. ③The subscales had high internal consistency, and the alpha coefficients ranged from 0.76 to 0.93. Conclusion: The Investment Model Scale Chinese Revised(IMS-CR) is a reliable and valid instrument, and can be used to measure the level of commitment in intimate relationship.

基金项目：

国家社会科学基金重点项目(14AZD111)

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 Le B, Agnew CR. Commitment and its theorized determinants: A meta-analysis of the investment model. Personal Relationships, 2003, 10(1): 37-57
2 李涛. 心理学视野中的承诺研究回顾. 心理研究,2011,4 (5):43-48
3 Le B, Dove NL, Agnew CR, et al. Predicting nonmarital romantic relationship dissolution: A meta-analytic synthesis. Personal Relationships, 2010, 17(3): 377-390
4 Rusbult CE, Buunk BP. Commitment processes in close relationships: An interdependence analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 1993, 10(2): 175-204
5 Stanley SM, Markman HJ. Assessing commitment in personal relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 1992, 54 (3): 595-608
6 Lydon J, Pierce T, O'Regan S. Coping with moral commitment to long-distance dating relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1997, 73(1): 104-113
7 Rusbult CE, Martz JM, Agnew CR. The investment model scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships,1998, 5(4): 357-387
8 罗兰·米勒,丹尼尔·珀尔曼(王伟平). 亲密关系(第5版). 北京:人民邮电出版社,2011
9 Adams JM, Jones WH. The conceptualization of marital commitment: An integrative analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1997, 72(5): 1177-1196
10 Johnson MP. Commitment: A conceptual structure and empirical application. Sociological Quarterly, 1973, 14(3): 395-406
11 Rusbult CE. Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1980, 16(2): 172-186
12 Le B, Korn MS, Crockett EE, et al. Missing you maintains us: Missing a romantic partner, commitment, relationship maintenance, and physical infidelity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2011, 28(5): 653-667
13 Rhatigan DL, Axsom DK. Using the investment model to understand battered women's commitment to abusive relationships. Journal of Family Violence, 2006, 21(2): 153-162
14 Agnew CR, Van Lange PAM, Rusbult CE, et al. Cognitive interdependence: Commitment and the mental representation of close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998, 74(4): 939-954
15 Ramirez Jr. A. An examination of the tripartite approach to commitment: An Actor-Partner Interdependence Model Analysis of the effect of relational maintenance behavior. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2008, 25(6):943-965
16 Rusbult CE. A longitudinal test of the investment model: The development(and deterioration) of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1983, 45(1): 101-117
17 Arriaga XB, Agnew CR. Being committed: Affective, cognitive, and conative components of relationship commitment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2001, 27(9):1190-1203
18 Young BJ, Furman W. Predicting commitment in young adults'physically aggressive and sexually coercive dating relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2013, 28 (17): 3245-3264
19 Rhatigan DL, Street AE. The impact of intimate partner violence on decisions to leave dating relationships: A test of the investment model. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2005,20(12): 1580-1597
20 Toplu-Demirtas E, Hatipoglu-Sumer Z, White JW. The relation between dating violence victimization and commitment among Turkish college women: Does the investment model matter? International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 2013,7(2): 203-215
21 Vanderdrift LE, Agnew CR, Wilson JE. Spanish version of the investment model scale. Personal Relationships, 2014, 21 (1): 110-124
22 Rodrigues D, Lopes D. The Investment Model Scale(IMS): Further studies on construct validation and development of a shorter version(IMS-S). The Journal of General Psychology,2013, 140(1): 16-28
23 李涛,徐光兴,王庭照. 婚姻承诺及其影响因素探析. 心理科学,2009,32(5):1270-1273
24 Spanier GB. Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1976, 38(1): 15-28
25 Shek DTL. Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale. Psychologia: An International Journal of Psychology in the Orient, 1994, 37(1): 7-17
26 汪向东,王希林,马弘. 心理卫生评定量表手册. 北京:中国心理卫生杂志社,1999
27 Kline RB. Principles and practices of structural equation modeling(3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press, 2011
28 Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1999, 6(1): 1-55
29 陆爱桃,张积家,Michael Harris Bond,等. 冲突与支持影响情侣依恋的文化差异. 心理学报,2009,41(6):534-544

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】