|
目的:探讨4~6岁幼儿元记忆监测准确性(EOL,JOL,JOC))与记忆成绩的相关.方法:采用3年龄(4,5,6)×2性别(男,女)×2材料难度(难,易)的混合实验设计.结果:①EOL、JOL和JOC准确性与记忆成绩间总体相关分别为-0.69、-0.65,-0.50,均达到0.01显著性水平.②年龄越小EOL、JOL和JOC准确性与记忆成绩间的相关值越高.③EOL、JOL和JOC准确性与记忆成绩间的相关不存在显著性别差异.④高难度材料上EOL准确性与记忆成绩间相关值显著高于低难度材料上.结论:4~6岁幼儿EOL和JOL准确性均与记忆成绩有较高相关;JOC准确性与记忆成绩呈中等相关.年龄和性别不是影响元记忆监测准确性与记忆成绩相关的主要因素.材料难度影响EOL准确性与记忆成绩间相关程度.
|
|
Objective: The study aimed to investigate the relationship between accuracy of metamemory monitoring (EOL, JOL, JOC) and memory performance in 4-6 years old children. Methods: We adopted a 3×2×2(age, gende,rmateri-al) mixed experimental design. Results: ①There was a significant correlation between memory monitoring(EOL, JOL, JOC) accuracy and memory performance. The values of correlation were: -0.69, -0.65, -0.50, respectively. ②The lower the age, the higher the value of correlation was observed, suggesting a developmental difference trend in the correlation of memory monitoring with memory performance. ③No significant gender difference was observed in the correlation between metamem-ory monitoring(EOL, JOL, JOC) accuracy and memory performance. ④The more difficult the memory material presented, the higher correlation was observed between EOL accuracy and memory performance. Conclusion: The accuracies of EOL and JOL both have high correlations with memory performance in 4 to 6 years old children. In this relationship, material dif-ficulty may serve as a moderating role.
|
|
1 Howard CE, Andrés P, Broks P, Noad R, Sadler M, Coker D, et al. Memory, metamemory and their dissociation in temporal lobe epilepsy. Neuropsychologia, 2010, 48: 921-932
2 Metcalfe J. Evolution of metacognition. In Dunlosky J, Bjork R. Handbook of Metacognitionand Learning: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2008. 138-322
3 黎坚,袁文东,骆方,杜卫. 心理负荷对元记忆监测准确性及偏差的影响. 心理发展与教育,2009,3:61-67
4 de Carvalho Filho, MK, Yuzawa M. The effects of social influences and general metacognitive knowledge on metamemory judgments. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2006, 26(4): 571-587
5 Antshel KM, Nastasi R. Metamemory development in preschool children with ADHD. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 2008, 29: 403-411
6 Thiede KW, Anderson MCM, Therriault D. Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2003, 95(1): 66-73
7 Hager W, Hasselhorn M. Memory monitoring and memory performance: Linked closely or loosely? . Psychological Research, 1992, 54(2): 110-113
8 Sinkavich FJ. Performance and metamemory: Do students know what they don't know? Journal of Instructional Psychology, 1995, 22(1): 77-87
9 唐卫海,刘希平,方格. 回忆准备就绪程度的判断准确性与记忆成绩的相关. 心理科学,2006,29(1):91-93
10 刘希平,唐卫海,方格. 任务难度预见的准确性与记忆成绩的相关. 心理科学,2004,27(1):111-113
11 贾宁,张石磊,陈洁彬. 词频对学习判断的影响. 心理学探新,2010,30(6):32-35
12 Weaver CA, Bryant DS. Monitoring of com-prehension: The role of text difficulty in metamemory for narrative and expository text. Memory and Cognition, 1995, 23(1): 12-22
13 石靓子,刘希平. 客体记忆能力与元记忆能力发展的比较. 心理科学,2009,32(1):85-88
14 Schneider W, Pressly M. Memory Development Between 2 and 20, 1989. 80-100
|