中国临床心理学杂志

特拉华欺负受害量表(学生卷)中文版信、效度研究

作者：谢家树¹ 吕永晓¹ George G. Bear² Chunyan Yang² Seth J. Marshall³ Rong Gong³

单位：1. 湖南师范大学教育科学学院长沙410081
2. University of Delaware Newark DE 19716
3. Middle Tennessee State University Murfreesboro TN 37132

关键词：特拉华欺负受害量表信度效度心理测量学研究

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2015,23(4):594-596

摘要：

目的:检验特拉华欺负受害量表(学生卷)(DBVS-S)中文版在中国青少年中的信度和效度。方法:应用中文版DBVS-S对湖南省4个地区10所学校小学六年级至高三2443名学生施测,以流调中心抑郁量表(CES-D)、学生生活满意度量表(SLSS)和Olweus儿童欺负问卷(BVQ)为效标,测评效标关联效度,随机抽取其中2个班计117名被试间隔4周后重测。结果:①DBVS-S中文版维度结构与原量表一致,探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析均支持三因子结构模型;②DVBS-S中文版总分与CES-D和BVQ的相关系数分别为0.360和0.766(P <0.001),与SLSS的相关系数为-0.184(P <0.001);③总量表α系数为0.839,4周后的重测相关系数为0.684。结论:特拉华欺负受害量表(学生卷)中文版具有较好的信效度。

Objective: To investigate the reliability and validity of the Chinese Version of Delaware Bullying Victimiza-tion Scale-Student(DBVS-S). Methods: 2443 students were measured, 117 of which participated the test-retest 4 weeks later. CES-D, SLSS and BVQ were used as the criteria-related validity instrument. Results: ①Exploratory and confirmato-ry factor analyses showed the scale was composed of 3 factors; ②The DBVS-S had significant positive correlation with CES-D and BVQ; ③Cronbach's α coefficients of the Chinese Version of the DBVS-S was 0.839, and the test-retest reli-ability was 0.684. Conclusion: The Chinese version of DBVS-S has acceptable psychometric properties.

基金项目：

本研究得到湖南省哲学社科规划基金项目(14YBA278)资助

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 Olweus D. Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Oxford: Blackwell, 1993
2 张兴慧,等. 儿童青少年校园受欺负潜在类别及与焦虑的关系. 中国临床心理学杂志,2014,22(4):631-634
3 Menesini E, Modena M, Tani F. Bullying and victimization in adolescence: Concurrent and stable roles and psychological health symptoms. The Journal of Genetic Psychology,2009, 170(2): 115-134
4 Due P, Hansen EH, Merlo J, et al. Is victimization from bullying associated with medicine use among adolescents? A nationally representative cross-sectional survey in Denmark. Pediatrics, 2007, 120(1): 110-117
5 Hinduja S, Patchin JW. Bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide. Archives of Suicide Research, 2010, 14(3): 206-221
6 刘小群,等. 初中生欺负、受欺负行为与抑郁、自杀意念的关系. 中国临床心理学杂志,2013,21(1):85-87
7 李海垒. 受欺负儿童的心理韧性与抑郁、焦虑的关系. 硕士毕业论文,2006
8 Olweus D. Invited expert discussion paper: Cyberbullying: An overrated phenomenon?. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 2012, 1-19. doi:10.1080/17405629.2012.682358
9 Bear GG, Gaskins C, Blank J, Chen FF. Delaware school climate Survey-Student: Its factor structure, concurrent validity, and reliability. Journal of School Psychology, 2011, 49(1):157-174. doi:10. 1016/j. jsp.2011.01.001
10 Delaware Positive Behavior Support Project(DE-PBS). Delaware School Climate Surveys Technical Manual, 2011. 12
11 Delaware Positive Behavior Support Project(DE-PBS). Delaware School Climate Surveys Technical Manual, 2013. 12
12 汪向东,王希林,马弘. 心理卫生评定量表手册. 中国心理卫生杂志社,1999. 200-201
13 Sandal O, Wold B, Bronis M. Relationship between Students'Perceptions of School Environment, Their Satisfaction with School and Perceived Academic Achievement: An International Study, School Effectiveness and School Improvement,1999, 10(3): 296-320
14 张文新,武建芬. Olweus儿童欺负问卷中文版的修订. 心理发展与教育,1999,2:7-11
15 张文新. 学校中的欺负问题. 山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2001,3:3-8
16 张文新. 中小学生欺负/受欺负的普遍性与基本特点. 心理学报,2002,34(4):387-394
17 张文新,王益文,等. 儿童欺负行为的类型及其相关因素. 心理发展与教育,2001,17(1):12-17
18 Marsh HW, Nagengast B, Morin AJS, et al. Construct validity of the multidimensional structure of bullying and victimization: An application of exploratory structural equation modeling. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2011, 103:701-732

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】