中国临床心理学杂志

中文形容词大五人格量表的初步编制Ⅱ:测验效度

作者：罗杰¹ 戴晓阳²

单位：1. 贵州师范大学教育科学学院贵州省普通高校基础心理与认知神经科学特色重点实验室贵阳550001
2. 深圳大学心理系深圳518060

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2015,23(4):571-575

摘要：

目的:考察《中文形容词大五人格量表(BFFP-CAS)》的测验效度。方法:运用自编的《中文形容词大五人格量表》对国内7所高校的1208名在校大学生进行测试。结果:①运用主轴法在特质层面上进行探索性因素分析,同时借助平行分析的技术得到比较满意的因子结构,26个特质的共同度在0.402~0.782之间,经Promax斜交旋转,26个特质不存在跨负荷现象,5个维度的方差解释率为63.179%;②本量表与NEO-PI-R中文修订本和CBF-PI在5个对应维度上的相关分别为0.422(开放性)~0.798(严谨性),0.452(开放性)~0.818(严谨性);与50-BRS和GFFS在对应维度间的相关分别是0.366(神经质)~0.583(宜人性),0.425(利他性)~0.713(社交性),以上效标关联系数均达到统计学显著水平。结论:《中文形容词大五人格量表》涵盖人格维度和侧面特质层面,具有良好的测量效度。

Objective: The current study aimed at testing the validity of the Chinese Adjectives Scale of Big-Five Fac-tor Personality(BFFP-CAS). Methods: A total of 1208 college students from seven universities were administered BFFPCAS. Results: Both principal axis analysis and parallel analysis showed that the BFFP-CAS had a good factor structure. The communities of 26 facets ranged from 0.402 to 0.782. Within the 26 facet scales, quite clear version of the Big-Five fac-tor was found, and nothing else of substance was uncovered when the promax-rotated procedure was used. Five factors ex-plained 63.179% of the total variance; The BFFP-CAS also showed good Criterion-Related Validities, that the factors of BFFP-CAS were correlated strongly with relevant dimensions of NEO-PI-R and CBF-PI, ranged from 0.422(Openness) to 0.623(Conscientiousness) and from 0.452(Openness) to 0.818(Conscientiousness), respectively; and the correlation between dimensions of BFFP-CAS and related dimensions of the 50-BRS and GFFS were also significant, ranged from 0.366(Neu-roticism) to 0.583(Agreeableness) and from 0.425(Altruistic) to 0.713(Sociability), respectively. Conclusion: The BFFPCAS, as a valid assessment of Big-Five personality dimensions and facets, has excellent validity in Chinese population.

基金项目：

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 罗杰,戴晓阳.“大五”人格测验在我国使用情况的元分析. 中国临床心理学杂志,2011,19(6):740-742
2 罗杰,戴晓阳. 人格测验中条目呈现方式与记分方式的效应初探. 中国临床心理学杂志,2015,23(2):236-241
3 罗杰,戴晓阳. 中文形容词大五人格量表的初步编制Ⅰ: 理论框架与测验信度. 中国临床心理学杂志,2015,23(3):381-385
4 戴晓阳,姚树桥,蔡太生,等. NEO个性问卷修订本在中国的应用研究. 中国心理卫生杂志,2004,18(3):170-174
5 戴晓阳,吴依泉. NEO-PI-R在16-20岁人群中的应用研究. 中国临床心理学杂志,2005,13(1):14-18
6 王孟成,戴晓阳,姚树桥. 中国大五人格问卷的初步编制 Ⅰ:理论框架与信度分析. 中国临床心理学杂志,2010,18 (5):545-548
7 王孟成,戴晓阳,姚树桥. 中国大五人格问卷的初步编制 Ⅱ:效度分析. 中国临床心理学志,2010,18(6):687-690
8 Goldberg LR. The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 1992, 4(1): 26-42
9 Howard PJ, Medina PL, Howard JM. The big five locator: A quick assessment tool for consultants and trainer. In JW Pfeiffer( ed.), the 1996 Annual: San Diego, Pfeiffer and Company,1996, 1: 119-122
10 Russell DW. In search of underlying dimensions: The use (and abuse) of factor analysis in personality and social psychology bulletin. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,2002, 28(12): 1629-1646
11 Henson RK, Robert JK. Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research: Common errors and some comment improved practice. Educational and Psychological Measurement,2006, 66(3): 392-416
12 Reise SP, Waller NG, Comrey AL. Factor analysis and scale revision. Psychological Assessment, 2000, 12(3): 287-297
13 Zwick WR, Velicer WF. Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin, 1986, 99 (3): 432-442
14 Streiner DL. Figuring out factors: the use and misuse of factor analysis. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 1994, 39(3):135-175
15 王登峰,崔红. 中国人人格量表的信度与效度. 心理学报,2004,36(3):347-358
16 宋维真,张建新,张建平,等. 编制中国人个性测量表 (CPAI)的意义与程序. 心理学报,1993,25(4):401-407
17 Tsaousis I. The trait personality questionnaire: A Greek measure for the five-factor model. Personality and Individual Differences, 1999, 26(2): 262-274
18 崔红,王登峰. 中国人人格形容词评定量表(QZPAS)的信度、效度与常模. 心理科学,2004,27(1):31-33
19 王登峰,崔红,胡军生,等. 中国青少年人格量表(QZPS-Q) 的编制. 心理发展与教育,2006,22(3):110-115
20 Costa PT, McCrae RR, Dye DA. Facet scales for agreeableness and conscientiousness: a revision of the NEO Personality Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 1991,12(9): 887-898
21 Digman JM, Takemotochock NK. Factors in the naturallanguage of personality reanalysis, comparison, and interpretation of 6 major studies. Multivariate Behavioral Research,1981, 16(2): 149-170
22 Rushton JP, Irwing P. A General Factor of Personality(GFP) from two meta-analyses of the Big Five: Digman(1997) and Mount, Barrick, Scullen, and Rounds(2005). Personality and Individual Differences, 2008, 45(7): 679-683
23 Digman JM. Higher-order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1997, 73(6): 1246-1256
24 Mount MK, Barrick MR, Scullen SM, et al. Higher-order dimensions of the big five personality traits and the big six vocational interest types. Personnel Psychology, 2005, 58(2):447-478
25 Musek J. A general factor of personality: Evidence for the Big One in the five-factor model. Journal of Research in Personality, 2007, 41(6): 1213-1233
26 Ashton MC, Lee K, Goldberg LR, et al. Higher order factors of personality: Do they exist?. Personality and Social Psychological Review, 2009, 13(2): 79-91

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】