中国临床心理学杂志

伯克利情绪表达量表中文版在中国大学生中的信、效度分析

作者：赵鑫张冰人周玮丁小斌

关键词：情绪表达信度效度大学生

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2015,23(3):406-409

摘要：

目的:本研究旨在探讨伯克利情绪表达量表在中国文化背景下的信、效度。方法:采用伯克利情绪表达量表测量1037名18-24岁的中国大学生, 另采用中文版情绪调节量表、正负性情绪量表及自评抑郁量表检验效标关联效度。一个月后抽取105名大学生进行重测。结果:修订的伯克利情绪表达量表包括正性情绪表达、负性情绪表达、负性情绪抑制、正性情绪表达强度和负性情绪表达强度五个维度, 共16个题项。探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析结果支持了中文版情绪表达量表的五因素模型。问卷总体的内部一致性系数为0.77, 五个分量表的内部一致性信度在0.58-0.72之间, 重测信度在0.53-0.63之间。伯克利情绪表达量表中文版具有较好的效标关联效度。结论:伯克利情绪表达量表中文版具有良好的信度和效度, 可以用于中国大学生情绪表达的测量。

Objective: The goal of this research was to assess the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Berkley Expressivity Questionnaire. Methods: A sample of 1037 Chinese college students between the age of 18-24 were asked to complete the Chinese version of Berkley Expressivity Questionnaire, along with Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, Positive And Negative Affect Scale and Self-Rating Depression Scale, which are chozen as criterion. 105 of the students were randomly selected to be retested(1 month interval). Results: Chinese version of Berkley Expressivity Questionnaire contained 16 items, and five dimentionalities including positive expressivity, negative expressivity, negative inhibition, positive impulse strength and negative impulse strength. The results of confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the five factor correlated model fit the data well. Cronbach's α reliability coefficients were 0.68 for Berkley Expressivity Questionnaire, and 0.58-0.72 for the five subscales; the test-retest reliabilities of the five subscales ranged from 0.54-0.63. The Chinese version of Berkley Expressivity Questionnaire had good criterion validity as well. Conclusion: The Chinese version of Berkley Expressivity Questionnaire, with satisfactory validity and reliablity, is an effective measure of emotion expressivity in college students.

基金项目：

甘肃省教育科学"十二五"规划课题重点项目(GS[2013]GHBZ086);西北师范大学青年教师科研能力提升计划(SKQ?NYB12009);西北师范大学本科生"学术能力提升计划"项目:伯克利情绪表达性问卷中文版修订及大学生情绪表达对抑郁情绪的预测作用研究资助

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 Gross JJ, John OP. Facets of emotional expressivity: Three self-report factors and their correlates. Personality and Individual Differences, 1995, 19(4): 555-568
2 Gross JJ. Emotion regulation: affective, cognitive, and social consequences. Psychophysiology, 2002, 39: 281-291
3 Gray SM. Heatherington L. The importance of social context in the facilitation of emotional expression in man. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 2003, 22(3): 294-314
4 邓丽芳, 郑日昌. 大学生的情绪向性-表达性与心理健康关系的研究. 心理发展与教育, 2003, 2:69-73
5 李响. 情绪表达性对人际关系的影响概述. 社会心理科学, 2011, 26(9):1036-1039
6 王明忠, 周宗奎, 陈武. 父母情感温暖与青少年人际能力: 情绪表达能力和社交性的间接效应. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2013, 21(2):288-291
7 戎幸. 情绪表达性和人际关系对共情准确性的影响. 浙江:浙江师范大学心理系, 2010
8 何庆欢, 豆春霞, 彭子文, 等. 抑郁青少年快感缺失与情绪表达的相关研究. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2011, 10(19): 1242-124
9 Kring AM, Smith DA, Neale JM. Individual differences in dispositional expressiveness: development and validation of the emotional expressivity scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1994, 66(5): 934-949
10 周婷, 王登峰. 情绪表达抑制与心理健康的关系. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2012, 20(1):65-68
11 Friedman HS, Prince LM, Riggio RE, DiMatteo MR. Understanding and assessing nonverbal expressiveness: The affective communication Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980, 39(2): 333-351
12 Kring LA, Emmons RA. Conflict over emotional expression: Psychological and physical correlates. Joumal of Personality and Social Psyhcology, 1990, 58: 867-877
13 Halberstadt AG, Cassidy J, Stifter CA, et al. Self-expressiveness within the family context: Psychometric support for a new measure. Psychological Assessment, 1995, 7: 93-103
14 Diener E, Smith H, Fujita F. The personality structure of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1995, 69 (1): 130-141
15 Gross JJ, Carstensen LL, Tsai J. Emotion and aging: Experience, expression, and control. Psychology and Aging, 1997, 72: 435-448
16 Gross JJ, John OP. Revealing feelings: Facets of emotional expressivity in self-reports, peer ratings, and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1997, 72: 435-448
17 http://spl.stanford.edu/director.html
18 Ahmet Ak?n. The validity and reliability of the turkish version of the berkeley expressivity scale. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2011, 30: 27-33
19 Jennifer L, Dobbs DM, Sloan AK. A psychometric investigation of two self-report measures of emotional expressivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 2007, 43: 697-702
20 Gross JJ, John OP. Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2003, 85: 348-362
21 王力, 柳恒超, 李中权. 情绪调节问卷中文版的信、效度研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2007, 15(6):503-505
22 Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998, 54: 1063-1070
23 黄丽, 杨廷忠, 季忠民. 正性负性情绪量表的中国人群适用性研究. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2003, 17(1):54-56
24 Zung WW. A self-rating depression scale. Archives of General Psychiatry, 1965, 12: 63-70
25 刘贤臣, 戴郑生, 唐茂芹, 等. 自评抑郁量表(SDS)医学生测查结果的因子分析. 中国健康心理学杂志, 1994, 2(3):151-154
26 Gross JJ, John OP. Wise emotion regulation. In Feldman Barrett L, Salovey P. The wisdom of feelings: Psychological Process in Emotional intelligenee. New York: Guilford, 1998
27 Emily AB, Tiane LL, Gross JJ. Emotion regulation and culture: Are the social consequences of emotion suppression culture-specific? Emotion, 2007, 7(1): 30-48
28 赵鑫, 金戈, 周仁来. 什么样人更善于情绪调节?—情绪调节的个体差异研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2013, 21(3):518-521
29 赵鑫, 史娜, 付丽, 等. 情绪识别与认知重评对社会适应不良的预测研究(英). 中国临床心理学杂志, 2013, 21(6):1029-1032

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】