中国临床心理学杂志

尴尬易感性量表中文版用于大学生样本的效度和信度

单位：1. 哈尔滨师范大学教育科学学院哈尔滨150025
2. 铁力市职业教育中心学校铁力152500
3. 绍兴文理学院教育学院绍兴312000

关键词：尴尬倾向效度信度

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2015,23(3):401-405

摘要：

目的:在中国大学生群体中引入尴尬易感性量表(susceptibility to embarrassment scale, SES)并检验其信效度。方法:采用中文SES对1240名大学生进行了调查, 共收回有效问卷1136份。另用特质内疚量表、羞耻量表、羞怯量表、社交焦虑量表在90名大学生中检验预测效度和效标关联效度。间隔4周后, 随机抽取60名大学生进行重测。结果:中文SES包括自我形象担忧、过度关注他人评价、低社交效能和负性体验4个分量表, 共23个条目;验证性因素分析显示数据拟合良好(χ2/df =2.93, CFI=0.89, TLI=0.91, RMSEA=0.06, SRMR=0.07);量表总分与特质内疚、羞耻、羞怯、社交焦虑的相关系数在0.28～0.45 之间;4 个分量表的Cronbach's α系数为0.68～0.89, 重测信度为0.67～0.80。结论:中文尴尬易感性量表在大学生中使用的各项信、效度指标均符合心理测量学要求。

Objective: To investigate the psychometric attributes of the Chinese Version of Susceptibility to Embarrassment scale(SES). Methods: 1240 university students were asked to complete the Chinese version of SES, 90 of which were additional asked to complete Trait Guilty Scale, Social Anxiety Inventory, Shame Scale, Shyness Scale and a self-assessment embarrassment item. 60 students were chosen to complete the Chinese version of SES after four weeks. Results: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses yielded four factors: self-image concerns, excessive focus on others evaluation, low social efficiency and negative experience, with Cronbach'a coeffients ranging from 0.68 to 0.89 and the test-retest reliabilities ranging from 0.67 to 0.80. The criterion validity was also acceptable in this sample. Conclusion: The Chinese version of SES can be uesd as an effective instrument to assess the embarrassment proneness in Chinese university students.

基金项目：

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 孙艳华, 马伟娜. 尴尬情绪的研究述评. 健康研究, 2009, 6:484-488 2 Ekman P. An argument for basic emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 1992, 6(3-4): 169-200 3 Keltner D, Buswell B N. Embarrassment: Its distinct form and appeasement functions. Psychological Bulletin, 1997, 122(3): 250-270 4 Jimenez L,Walkerdine V. A psychosocial approach to shame, embarrassment and melancholia amongst unemployed young men and their fathers. Gender and Education, 2011, 23(2): 185-199 5 Coffaro F. The effects of embarrassment on cognition and behavior. San Diego, University of California, 2011 6 Darby RS, Harris CR. Embarrassment's effect on facial processing. Cognition and Emotion, 2010, 24(7): 1250-1258 7 Sabini J, Garvey B, Hall AL. Shame and embarrassment revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2001, 27 (1): 104-117 8 Kelly KM, Jones WH. Assessment of dispositional embarrassability. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 1997, 10(4): 307-333 9 Modigliani A. Embarrassment and embarrassability. Sociometry, 1968. 313-326 10 Alansari BM. Situational Embarrassment Scale manual. Kuwait: Univer-sity Book Home, 1996 11 Mitchell KA, Rawl SM, Champion VL, et al. Development and psychometric testing of the colonoscopy embarrassment scale. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 2012, 34(4): 548-564 12 Howard HA. Condom embarrassment scale. Handbook of Sexuality-related Measures, 1998, 29: 137 13 Mosher DL, White BB. On differentiating shame and shyness. Motivation and Emotion, 1981, 5(1): 61-74 14 韩玺英. 中学生自我意识情绪理解能力及相关因素研究. 北京:首都师范大学硕士论文, 2010 15 范文翼. 婴儿尴尬情绪的发生研究. 大连:辽宁师范大学硕士论文, 2012 16 Cho EJ, Chung BY, Lee K, et al. Psychometric evaluation of uterine cervical cancer screening embarrassment questionnaire among Korean women: Complementary use of rasch model. Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing, 2011, 17 (5): 463-473 17 Maltby J, Day L. The reliability and validity of a susceptibility to embarrassment scale among adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 2000, 29(4): 749-756 18 石瑜婷. 大学生归因方式、人格特征与内疚关系研究. 福州:福建师范大学硕士论文, 2010 19 钱铭怡. 大学生羞耻量表的修订. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2000, 14(4):217-221 20 汪向东, 王希林, 马弘. 心理卫生评定量表手册. 增订版. 北京:中国心理卫生杂志社, 1999. 246-247 21 马弘. 社交焦虑量表. 增刊. 中国心理卫生杂志, 1999.244-245 22 刘勇, 陈健芷, 姜梦, 等. 多维状态无聊量表中文版在中国大学生中的应用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2013, 21(4):558-561 23 Kelly KM, Jones WH, Adams JM. Using the imaginary audience scale as a measure of social anxiety in young adults. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2002, 62(5):896-914

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】