中国临床心理学杂志

中文形容词大五人格量表的初步编制Ⅰ:理论框架与测验信度

作者：罗杰¹ 戴晓阳²

单位：1. 贵州师范大学教育科学学院贵州省普通高校基础心理与认知神经科学特色重点实验室贵阳550001
2. 深圳大学心理系深圳518060

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2015,23(3):381-385

摘要：

目的:以特质理论中的"大五"人格结构模型为理论框架, 编制中国大五人格形容词量表。方法:运用人格研究的心理语言学方法编制涵盖人格维度和特质层面的《中文形容词大五人格量表》, 1208名在校大学生参与了本次测试。结果:①以双极词为条目, 6点记分为记分方式, 所编制的《中文大五人格形容词量表》条目数适中, 测量了5个大维度和26个侧面特质, 共104个条目。②测量信度方面, 5个大维度的内部一致性系数(α系数)在0.902(宜人性)至0.917(开放性)之间, 平均为0.910;26个侧面特质的α系数在0.628(责任心)至0.870(抑郁)之间, 平均为0.741;间隔2周的重测信度在维度层面上均达到0.85以上, 在0.868(宜人性)至0.935(外倾性)之间;26个侧面特质的重测信度均大于0.70, 达到了同类人格测验应有的水平。结论:本研究所研制的《中文形容词大五人格量表》涵盖了人格维度和特质层面, 条目数适中, 具有良好的测量信度。

Objective: Based on the widly accepted Big-Five structure model, the current study aimed at developing a new instrument to assess Big-Five personality in Chinese population. Methods: A total of 1208 students from seven universities were administered the Chinese Adjectives Scale of Big-Five Factor Personality(BFFP-CAS), which is a 6-point scale using bipolar variables as items. Results: BFFP-CAS consisted of 104 items totally, covering 26 facet factors and 5 broad dimensions. Reliabilities of the BFFP-CAS were generally fairly good. At the dimension level, all of the coefficient α of BFFP-CAS were above 0.90, ranged from 0.902(Agreeableness) to 0.917(Openness). The test-retest reliability coefficients were above 0.85, ranged from 0.868(Agreeableness) to 0.935(Extraversion). At the facet level, the internal consistency reliabilities ranged from 0.628(Dutifulness) to 0.870(Depression). The test-retest reliability coefficients of all of facet scales were above 0.70. Conclusion: The BFFP-CAS is a reliable assessment for personality measurement in chinese population.

基金项目：

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 John OP, Naumann LR, Soto CJ. Paradigm Shift to the integrative big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In John OP, Robins RW, Pervin LA, Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research(3th). New York: The Guilford Press, 2008. 114-158
2 罗杰, 戴晓阳."大五"人格测验在我国使用情况的元分析. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2011, 19(6):740-742
3 Costa PT, McCrae RR. NEO-PI-R. Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. Inc, 1992
4 Costa PT, McCrae RR. Domains and facets: Hierarchical personality assessment using the revised NEO personality inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1995, 64(1):21-50
5 John OP, Donahue EM, Kentle RL. The big five inventory —versions 4a and 54. Berkeley: University of California at Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research, 1991
6 Goldberg LR. The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 1992, 4(1): 26-42
7 周晖, 钮丽丽, 邹泓. 中学生人格五因素问卷的编制. 心理发展与教育, 2000, 16(1):48-54
8 王孟成, 戴晓阳, 姚树桥. 中国大五人格问卷的初步编制 Ⅰ:理论框架与信度分析. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2010, 18 (5):545-548
9 王孟成, 戴晓阳, 姚树桥. 中国大五人格问卷的初步编制 Ⅱ:效度分析.中国临床心理学杂志, 2010, 18(6):687-690
10 戴晓阳, 姚树桥, 蔡太生, 等. NEO个性问卷修订本在中国的应用研究. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2004, 18(3):170-174
11 戴晓阳, 吴依泉. NEO-PI-R在16-20岁人群中的应用研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2005, 13(1):14-18
12 Comrey AL. Factor-analytic methods of scale development in personality and clinical psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1988, 56(5): 754-761
13 Kishton JM, Widaman KF. Unidimensional versus domain representative parceling of questionnaire items: An empirical example. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1994, 54(3): 757-765
14 McCrae RR, Herbst JH, Costa PT. Effects of acquiescence on personality factor structures. In Riemann R, Ostendorf F, Spinath F. Personality and temperament: Genetics, evolution, and structure. Berlin: Pabst Science Publishers, 2001
15 戴晓阳, 曹亦薇. 心理评定量表的编制和修订中存在的一些问题. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2009, 17(5):562-565
16 Wu K, Lindsted KD, Tsai SY, Lee JW. Chinese NEO-PI-R in Taiwanese adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 2008, 44(3): 654-665
17 Savla J, Davey A, Costa PT, et al. Replicating the NEO-PIR factor structure in African-American older adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 2007, 43(5): 1279-1288
18 黄希庭, 谭小宏. 中学生责任心的理论构建研究. 心理科学, 2008, 31(1):11-15
19 王孟成, 楚艳民, 戴晓阳. 严谨性的结构及其应用研究述评. 心理科学进展, 2011, 19(3):440-448
20 Tsaousis I. The trait personality questionnaire: A Greek measure for the five-factor model. Personality and Individual Differences, 1999, 26(2): 262-274

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】