设为首页 | 加入收藏
网站首页 本刊简介 编委会 投稿指南 过刊浏览 广告合作 网上订购 下载专区 联系我们  
持续联结量表中文版的修订与初步应用
作者:李梅  李洁  时勘 
单位:中国人民大学心理学系  北京100872 
关键词:丧亲 哀伤 持续联结 信效度 
分类号:R395.1
出版年,卷(期):页码:2015,23(2):251-255
摘要:

目的:对引进的持续联结量表(Continuing Bonds Scale,CBS)进行修订和中文版的信效度检验。方法:采用持续联结量表中文版进行调查,获得了1288份有效数据。通过探索性因素分析,验证性因素分析,偏相关分析及内部一致性检验等方法评估该量表的信效度,并初步探索中国丧亲群体持续联结的特点。结果:持续联结量表中文版包括内化联结与外化联结两个维度。外化联结与复杂哀伤症状显著正相关,内化联结与个人成长显著正相关。结论:持续联结量表中文版具有良好的信度和结构效度,具有跨文化的适应性,可用于哀伤领域的研究和实践。

Objective:To validate the Chinese version of Continuing Bonds Scale(CBS-C).Methods:Data was collected from 1288 bereaved Chinese adults through a questionnaire survey. The construct validity of the measure was assessed through both exploratory and confirmatory analysis. The criterion-related validity and reliability of the scale was also examined. Background variables associating with continuing bonds were explored too.Results:The CBS-C contained internalized and externalized dimensions, and its psychometric properties were proved to be good. Internalized and externalized continuing bonds were found to be associated with a group of background variables.Conclusion:CBS-C is a valid tool to be applied in Chinese context.

基金项目:
中国人民大学科学研究基金项目(14XNLF10);2013年度国家社科基金重大项目(第二批)(13&ZD155)
作者简介:
参考文献:

1 Stroebe MS, Schut H, Stroebe W. Health outcomes of bereavement. The Lancet, 2007, 370:1960-1973
2 Baltes MM. Altern und Tod in der psychologischen Forschung[ Aging and death in psychological research]. In Tod und Sterben(R.Winau, (Eds.) HPR eds.). Berlin, Germany:de Gruyter, 1984
3 刘建鸿,李晓文. 哀伤研究:新的视角与理论整合. 心理科学进展,2007,15(3):470-475
4 徐洁,陈顺森,张日昇,等. 丧亲青少年哀伤过程的定性研究. 中国心理卫生杂志,2011,25(9):650-654
5唐信峰,贾晓明. 农村丧亲个体哀伤反应的质性研究. 中国临床心理学杂志,2013,21(4):690-695
6 Freud S. Mourning and melancholia. In A general selection from the works of Sigmund Freud(JR ed). New York, NY:Liveright Publishing, 1957. 124-140
7 Bowlby J. Loss, sadness and depression. New York:Basic Books, 1980
8 Shuchter SR, Zisook S. The course of normal grief. In Handbook of bereavement:Theory, research and intervention. Edited by Stroebe MS, Stroebe W, Hansson RO. New York:Cambridge University Press, 1993. 23-43
9 Stroebe MS, Schut H. To continue or relinquish bonds:A review of consquences for the bereaved. Death Studies, 2005,29 (6):477-494
10 Klass D, Silverman P, Nickman S. Continuing bonds:New understandings of grief. Washington, DC:American Psychological Association Press, 1996
11 Suhail K, Jamil N, Oyebode J, et al. Continuing bonds in bereaved Pakistani Muslims:Effects of culture and religion. Death Studies, 2011, 35 (1):22-41
12 Chan CLW, Chow AYM, Ho SMY,et al. The experience of Chinese bereaved persons:A preliminary study of meaning making and continuing bonds. Death Studies, 2005, 29(10):923-947
13 Field NP, Gal-Oz E, Bonanno GA. Continuing bonds and adjustment at 5 years after the death of a spouse. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2003, 71 (1):110-117
14 Boelen PA, Stroebe MS, Schut HAW,et al. Continuing bonds and grief:A prospective analysis. Death Studies, 2006, 30 (8):767-776
15 Field NP, Nichols C, Holen A, et al. The relation of continuing attachment to adjustment in conjugal bereavement. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1999, 67(2):212-218
16 Boerner K, Heckhausen J. To have and have not:Adaptive bereavement by transforming mental ties to the deceased. Death Studies, 2003, 27(3):199
17 Field NP, Gao B, Paderna L. Continuing bonds in bereavement:An attachment theory based perspective. Death Studies,2005, 29(4):277-299
18 Field NP, Filanosky C. Continuing bonds, risk factors for complicated grief, and adjustment to bereavement. Death Studies, 2010, 34(1):1-29
19 Stroebe MS, Schut H, Boerner K. Continuing bonds in adaptation to bereavement:Toward theoretical integration. Clinical Psychology Review, 2010, 30(2):259-268
20 Gassin EA, Lengel GJ. Let me hear of your mercy in the mourning:Forgiveness, grief, and continuing bonds. Death Studies,2014, 38(7):465-475
21 Johnson DR, Creech JC. Ordinal measures in multiple indicator models:A simulation study of categorization error. American Sociological Review, 1983, 48(3):398-407
22 Prigerson HG, Maciejewski PK, Reynolds CF, et al. Inventory of complicated grief:A scale to measure maladaptive symptoms of loss. Psychiatry Research, 1995, 59(1-2):65-79
23 Hogan NS, Greenfield DA, Schmidt LA. Development and validation of the Hogan Grief Reaction Checklist. Death Studies, 2001, 25:1-32
24 侯杰泰,温忠麟,成子娟. 结构方程模型及其应用. 北京:教育科学出版社,2004
25 Ho SMY, Chan ISF, Ma EPW, et al. Continuing bonds, attachment style, and adjustment in the conjugal bereavement among Hong Kong Chinese. Death Studies, 2013, 37(3):248-268
26 Neimeyer R, Baldwin SA, Gillies J. Continuing bonds and reconstructing meaning:Mitigating complications in bereavement. Death Studies, 2006, 30(8):715-738
27 Newson RS, Boelen PA, Hek K,et al. The prevalence and characteristics of complicated grief in older adults. Journal of Affective Disorders, 2011, 132(1-2):231-238
28 Fujisawa D, Miyashita M, Nakajima S, et al. Prevalence and determinants of complicated grief in general population. Journal of Affective Disorders, 2010, 127(1-3):352-358
29 He L, Tang S, Yu W, et al. The prevalence, comorbidity and risks of prolonged grief disorder among bereaved Chinese adults. Psychiatry Research, 2014, 219:347-352
30 Wortmann JH, Park CL. Religion and spirituality in adjustment following bereavement:An integrative review. Death Studies, 2008, 32:703-736

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【加入收藏
您是第访问者

《中国临床心理学杂志》编辑部
地址:湖南省长沙市中南大学湘雅二医院内, 410011
电 话:0731-85292472    电子邮件:cjcp_china@163.com
本系统由北京博渊星辰网络科技有限公司设计开发 技术支持电话:010-63361626