中国临床心理学杂志

夫妻观察研究中话题选择对问题解决行为的影响

作者：刘宣文¹ 琚晓燕² 华盛³

单位：1. 杭州师范大学教育学院杭州311121
2. 中国青年政治学院社会工作学院北京100089
3. 浙江衢州职业技术学院衢州324000

分类号：R395.6

出版年,卷(期):页码：2015,23(1):115-119

摘要：

目的: 探索夫妻观察研究法中所选话题的难度及话题类型对夫妻互动行为的影响,以检视观察研究的效度。方法: 以41对新婚夫妻为研究对象,采用问题解决的观察研究范式对夫妻的沟通进行录像,并采用爱荷华家庭互动编码体系(IFIRS)对其行为进行编码。结果: 夫妻所选话题的主观难度对夫妻在问题解决任务中的沟通行为没有影响。当妻子选择讨论关于丈夫“吸烟酗酒”问题时,丈夫的积极行为减少,消极行为增加。讨论其他话题没有引起夫妻互动行为的变异。结论: 以夫妻问题解决范式为基础的观察研究在中国夫妻中具有一定的效度。

Objective: To address the validity of observed couple problem-solving behavior, this study investigated the extent to which communication behavior is influenced by the topics couple selected in observational procedure. Methods: Newlywed couples(n=41) were engaged in two videotaped problem-solving conversations, and the topics discussed in each conversation were rated for perceived difficulty and coded for specific themes category. Results: The perceived difficulty of topic had no influences on couples'problem-solving behavior, however, husbands showed more negativity and less positivity in the conversation with specific themes(smoking and alcohols problem of husband) that were selected by wives. No theme effects were found in other topics. Conclusion: As a whole, the problem-solving paradigm show good validity in Chinese couples.

基金项目：

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 Patterson GR, Reid JB. Intervention for families of aggres-sive boys: A Replication Study. Behavioral Research and Therapy, 1973, 11: 383-394
2 Gottman JM, Notarius CI. Decade review: Observing marital interaction. Journal of Marriage and Family, 2000, 62(4): 927-947
3 Heyman RE. Observation of couple conflicts: Clinical assessment applications, stubborn truths, and shaky foundations. Psychological Assessment, 2001, 13(1): 5-35
4 Weiss RL, Heyman RE. A clinical research overview of couples interactions. In Halford WK, Markman HJ, et al. Clinical handbook of marriage and couples interventions. New York: Wiley, 1997. 13-41
5 Lindahl K, Clements M, Markman H. The development of marriage: A 9-year perspective. In Bradbury TN, et al. The developmental course of marital dysfunction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1998. 205-236
6 Williams-Baucom KJ, Atkins DC, Sevier M, et al.“You” and“I”need to talk about“us”: Linguistic patterns in marital interactions. Personal Relationships, 2010, 17: 41-56
7 Cornelius TL, Alessi G. Behavioral and physiological components of communication training: Does the topic affect outcome? Journal of Marriage and Family, 2007, 69: 608-620
8 Lowe AG. Let's give them something to talk about: How different topics affect conflict communication behavior. Dissertation, University of Marland, 2011
9 Sanford K. Problem-solving conversations in marriage: Does it matter what topics couples discuss? Personal Relationships, 2003, 10: 97-112
10 Gottman JM. Marital interaction: Experimental investigations (Vol. 5): Academic Press New York, 1979
11 Geiss SK, O'Leary KD. Therapist ratings of frequency and severity of marital problems: Implications for research. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 1981, 7(4): 515-520
12 Melby J, Conger R, Book R, et al. The Iowa Family Interac tion Rating Scales(5^th ed). Unpublished document, Iowa State University, Institute for Social and Behavioral Research, 1998
13 Williamson HC, Bradbury TN, Trail TE, et al. Factor analysis of the Iowa Family Interaction Rating Scales. Journal of Family Psychology, 2011, 25(6): 993-999
14 McGraw KO, Wong SP. Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods, 1996, 1(1): 30-46
15 Norton R. Measuring marital quality: A critical look at the dependent variable. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1983, 45 (1): 141-151
16 徐安琪,叶文振. 家庭生命周期和夫妻冲突的经验研究. 中国人口科学,2002,3: 41-49
17 王金玲. 家庭权力的性别格局: 不平等还是多维度网状分布? 华中科技大学学报: 社会科学版,2009,23: 62-68
18 亢林贵. 从父权到平权——中国家庭中权力变迁问题探讨. 山西青年管理干部学院学报,2011,24: 91-94
19 Gottman JM, Krokoff LJ. Marital interaction and satisfaction: A longitudinal view. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1989, 57(1): 47-52

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】