中国临床心理学杂志

内隐权力刻板印象: 基于IAT和GNAT的测量

作者：张珊明¹ 钟毅平² 罗伏生¹

单位：1. 中南林业科技大学心理健康教育研究中心长沙410004
2. 湖南师范大学心理系长沙410081

关键词：内隐权力刻板印象 IAT GNAT

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2015,23(1):56-59

摘要：

目的: 探讨权力刻板印象是否在内隐层面存在。方法: 实验1采用IAT对70名成人被试进行测验,实验2采用GNAT对66名成人被试进行测验。结果: ①在IAT中,被试的相容反应时显著短于不相容反应时,D值显著大于0; ②在GNAT中,被试在“高权力概念+高权力属性”和“低权力概念+低权力属性”任务条件下的d'均显著高于被试在“高权力概念+低权力属性”和“低权力概念+高权力属性”任务条件下的d'。结论: 权力刻板印象在内隐层面是存在的,人们更倾向于将高权力者与高能力、低热情联系在一起,而将低权力者与低能力、高热情联系在一起。

Objective: To explore whether the stereotype of power exists at an implicit level. Methods: 70 adult participants were measured by an Implicit Association Test in experiment 1; And 66 adult participants were measured by a Go/Nogo Association Task in experiment 2. Results: In the IAT, the compatible reaction time was significantly shorter than the incompatible reaction time, the D value was significantly greater than 0;In the GNAT, the participants'd'under the task of “high power concept + high power attribute”and“low-power concept + low-power attribute”were significantly higher than the participants'd'under the task of“high-power concept + low-power attribute”and“low-power concept + high-power attribute”. Conclusion: The stereotype of power exists at the implicit level, people would more likely to link the high-power with high competence and low warmth, and link the low-power with low competence and high warmth.

基金项目：

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 Fiske ST, Cuddy JC, Glick PS, et al. A Model of(often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2002, 82(6): 878-902
2 Russell AMT, Fiske ST. It's all relative: Competition and status drive interpersonal perception. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2008, 38: 1193-1201
3 Fragale AR, Rosen B, Xu C, et al. The higher they are, the harder they fall: The effects of wrongdoer status on observer punishment recommendations and intentionality attributions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2009, 108: 53-65
4 管健,程婕婷. 刻板印象内容模型的确认、测量及卷入的影响. 中国临床心理学杂志,2011,19(2): 184-191
5 张珊明,罗伏生,钟毅平,陈芸. 权力刻板印象及自我卷入的影响. 中国临床心理学杂志,2013,21(5): 751-753
6 Cuddy JC, Norton MI, Fiske ST. This old stereotype: the pervasiveness and persistence of the elderly stereotype. Journal of Social Issues, 2005, 61: 267-285
7 Eckes T. Paternalistic and envious gender stereotypes: Testing predictions from the Stereotype Content Model. Sex Roles, 2006, 47: 99-114
8 Yzerbyt VY, Provost V, Corneille O. Not so competent but warm . . . Really? Compensatory stereotypes in the Frenchspeaking world. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 2005, 8: 291-308
9 Kervyn N, Yzerbyt V, Judd C, et al.question of compensation: The social life of the fundamental dimensions of social perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2009, 96: 828-842
10 Bargh JA. The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition. In Wyer RS, Srull TK, et al. Handbook of social cognition:Vol1. Basic processes(2nd ed). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1994. 1-40
11 钟毅平. 社会认知心理学. 北京: 教育科学出版社,2012. 185-188
12 Rohmer O, Louvet E. Implicit measures of the stereotype content associated with disability. British Journal of Social Psychology, 2012, 51(4): 732-740
13 Greenwald AG, Nosek BA, Banaji MR. Understanding and using the implicit association test: An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2003, 85: 197-216
14 Mason MF, Zhang S, Dyer RL. Male susceptibility to attentional capture by power cues. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2010, 46(2): 482-485
15 Nosek BA, Banaji MR. The go/no-go association task. Social Cognition, 2001, 19(6): 625-664
16 王沛. 刻板印象的内隐效应与内-外群体效应的实验研究. 心理科学,2001,24(2): 178-181
17 王沛. 社会信息归类过程中刻板印象的内隐效应. 心理学报,2002,34(3): 301-305

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】