设为首页 | 加入收藏
网站首页 本刊简介 编委会 投稿指南 过刊浏览 广告合作 网上订购 下载专区 联系我们  
自我价值感及其领域权变性与主观幸福感的关系
作者:胡军生1 2  杨烨3  王登峰2 
单位:1. 井冈山大学教育学院  江西 吉安 343009 
2.
 北京大学心理学系  北京 100871 
3.
 常熟理工学院教育系 
关键词:自我价值感 自我价值感领域权变性 主观幸福感 调节作用 
分类号:R395.6
出版年,卷(期):页码:2009,17(2):200-203
摘要:

目的:考察大学生的自我价值感、自我价值感领域权变性水平及其与主观幸福感的关系。方法:采用自我价值感量表、自我价值感领域权变性量表和主观幸福感量表对320名大学生进行了调查。结果:自我价值感和自我价值感领域权变性各个因子都与主观幸福感相关显著,自我价值感与主观幸福感的相关高于自我价值感领域权变性与主观幸福感的相关,自我价值感对主观幸福感的方差解释量高于自我价值感领域权变性对主观幸福感的方差解释量(19.2%vs.12.4%),自我价值感领域权变性对自我价值感影响主观幸福感的调节作用不显著。结论:自我价值感比自我价值感领域权变性更能有效预测个体的主观幸福感。

Objective: To investigate self-worth, contingencies of self-worth and their relationship with subject well-be-ing(SWB). Methods: 320 Chinese university students were asked to complete the Contingencies of Self-worth Scale, the Self-worth Questionnaire and SWB Faces Scale. Results: There were significantly positive correlations between all the factors of self-worth and the contingencies of self-worth and SWB, but the correlations between the factors of self-worth and SWB were higher than those between the corresponding contingencies of self-worth and SWB. The total variance of SWB accounted for by self-worth was higher than that by the contingencies of self-worth (19.2% vs. 12.4%), and contin-gency of self-worth didn't have significant moderating effect of self-worth on SWB. Conclusion: SWB predicted by self-worth is more effective than by the contingencies of self-worth.

基金项目:
作者简介:
参考文献:

[1] Bro wn JD, Dutto n KA, Co o k KE. Fro m the to p do wn: S e lf e ste e m and se lf -e valuation. Cognition and Emotion,2001,15(5):615-631
[2] Rosenberg M. Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press,1965
[3] Hattie J. Models of Self-Concept that are Neither Top-Down or Bottom-Up: The Rope Model of Self-Concept. Proceedings of the 3rd International Biennial Self Research Conference. Berlin,2004
[4] Coopersmith S. The antecedents of self-esteem. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman,1967
[5] Shavelson RJ, Hubner JJ, Stanton GC. Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research,1976,46:407-441
[6] Harter S. Processes underlying the construction, mainte nance, and enhancement of the self-concept in children. In Suls J and Greenwald AW. Psychological perspectives on the self . Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum,1986,3:136-182
[7] Watkins D, Dong Q. Assessing the self-esteem of Chinese School Children . Educational Psychology,1994,14(1):129-137
[8] Mboya MM. Perceived teachers ’ behaviors and dimensions of adolescent self-concepts . Educational Psychology,1995,15(4):491-499
[9] 黄希庭,杨雄.青少年学生自我价值感量表的编制.心理科学,1998,21(4):289-292
[10] James W. The principles of psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press,1890
[11] Crocker J, Wolfe CT. Contingencies of self-worth. Psychological Review,2001,108:593-623
[12] Rosenberg M, Schooler C, Schoenbach C, et al. Global selfesteem and specific self- esteem: Different concepts, different outcomes. American Sociological Review,1995,60(1):141-156
[13] Harter S. Causes and consequences of low self-esteem in children and adolescents. In Baumeister RG. Self-esteem: The puzzle of low self-regard. New York: Plenum,1993.87-116
[14] HU JS, YANG Y, WANG DF, et al. Contingency as a moderator of the effect of domain self-esteem on global selfesteem. Social Behavior and Personality,2008,36(6):851-864
[15] Lemay Jr. EP, Ashmore RD. The relationship of social approval contingency to trait self-esteem: Cause, consequence, or moderator? Journal of Research in Personality,2006,40:121-139
[16] 杨烨.自我价值感二维模型的理论架构与实证研究.北京大学心理学系博士论文,2008
[17] 后华杰译. Andrews FM, Robinson JP.主观幸福感的测量.见:Robinson JP, Shaver PR,Wrightsman LS.性格与社会心理测量总揽(上册).台北:远流出版社,1997.90-156
[18] Aiken LS, West SG. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage,1991
[19] 黄希庭,凤四海,王卫红.青少年学生自我价值感全国常模的制定.心理科学,2003,26(2):194-198

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【加入收藏
您是第访问者

《中国临床心理学杂志》编辑部
地址:湖南省长沙市中南大学湘雅二医院内, 410011
电 话:0731-85292472    电子邮件:cjcp_china@163.com
本系统由北京博渊星辰网络科技有限公司设计开发 技术支持电话:010-63361626