中国临床心理学杂志

幼儿信念推理、抑制控制与意图理解能力的关系

作者：陈巍¹ 丁峻¹ 2

单位：1. 杭州师范大学心理学系浙江杭州 310018
2. 英国诺丁汉大学心理学院英国诺丁汉

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2009,17(2):178-181

摘要：

目的：考察3、4岁幼儿信念推理、抑制控制与意图理解能力发展的关系。方法：通过经典错误信念任务、抑制控制与膝跳反射任务对44名儿童进行施测。结果：①3、4岁在完成三类任务时均存在显著的年龄差异。②除了手游戏与意外内容任务之外，其余各类任务上的表现均呈现显著相关，且三类任务总分在排除年龄影响后仍保持显著相关。③日/夜Stroop任务与信念推理总分、膝跳反射任务在排除年龄影响后仍保持显著相关。④日/夜Stroop任务与膝跳反射任务分别可以显著预测信念推理、抑制控制能力。结论：幼儿抑制控制能力影响信念推理，意图理解能力影响抑制控制。

Objective: The present study examined 3 and 4-year-old children's relationship between the capabilities of belief reasoning, inhibitory control and understanding of intention. Methods: 44 chlidren accepted three kinds of tests in-cluding classic false-belief, inhibitory control and knee-jerk reflex. Results: ①In competing these three kinds of tasks, there's a significant difference between age of 3 and 4-year-old children. ②Except hand game and unexpected content task, the performance of other tasks showed significant correlations, and the total score of those three tasks, with the exclusion of age, remained significant. ③ With the exclusion of age, the relationships between the tasks of day/night Stroop, false-belief and knee-jerk reflex were still significant. ④Day/night Stroop task and knee-jerk reflex task could be used to predict the children's belief reasoning and inhibitory control respectively. Conclution: Children's inhibitory control impacts their belief reasoning, and intention understanding impacts their inhibitory control.

基金项目：

教育部科研规划项目(FBB011469);浙江省哲学社会科学基金项目(N05ZX07)

作者简介：

参考文献：

[1] Hughes C, Russell J. Autistic children ’ s difficulty with mental disengagement from an object: Its implication for theoriesof autism. Developmental Psychology,1993,29:498-510
[2] Mildner V. The cognitive neuroscience of human communication. New York London: Taylor andFrancis Croup,2008
[3] Hughes JR. A review of recent reports on autism:1000 studies published in 2007. Epilepsy and behavior,2008,8:425-437
[4] Baron-Cohen S, Tager-Flusberg H, Cohen DJ. Understand- ing others minds: Perspectives from develoPmental cognitive neuroscience. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press,2000
[5] Engel A, Burke M, Fiehler K, et al. What activates the hu- man mirror neuron system during observation of artificial movements: Bottom-up visual features or top-down inten- tions? Neuropsychologia,2008,46:2033-2042
[6] Lang B, Perner J. Understanding of intention and false belief andthe development of self control. British Journal of De- velopmental Psychology,2002,20:67-76
[7] Wimmer H, Perner J. Belief about beliefs: Representation and the constraining function ofwrong beliefs in young chil- dren ’ s understanding of deception. Cognition,1983,13:103-128
[8] Gopnik A, Astington JW. Children's understanding of repre- sentational change to the understanding of false belief and the appearance -reality distinction. and its relation. Child DeveloPment,1988,59:26-37
[9] Gerstadt CL, Hong YJ, Diamond A. The relationship be - tween cognition and action: Performance of children 3.5-7 years old on a Stroop-like day-night test. Cognition,1994,53:129-153
[10] Hughes C. Finding your marbles: Dose preschoolers’ strate- gic behavior predict later understanding? DeveloPmental Psychology,1998,34:1326-1339
[11] Lang B, Perner J. Understanding of intention and false be- lief and the development of self control. British Journal of Developmental Psychology,2002,201:67-76
[12] 廖渝，吴睿明，Zelazo PD，等.意外地点任务中不同测试问题及意图理解与执行功能的关系.心理学报，2006，38：207-215
[13] Meltzoff AN, Prinz W. The imitative mind: Development, evolution, and brain bases. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press,2002
[14] Wei Chen, Ti-Fei Yuan. Mirror neuron system as the joint from action to language. Neuroscience Bulletin,2008,24:259-264

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】