中国临床心理学杂志

认知能力筛查测验C-2.0在成都地区老年人群应用的信度和效度

作者：陆蓉¹ 罗祖明² 刘协和²

单位：1. 南京脑科医院南京 210029
2. 华西医科大学附一院成都 610041

关键词：认知能力筛查测验信度效度

分类号：G449.5

出版年,卷(期):页码：2000,8(2):70-72

摘要：

目的：评价CASIC-20量表的信度和效度.方法：对807名老年人进行认知能力检查.结果：CASIC-20具有良好的信度,在效度方面,其敏感性与MMSE相当;特异性高于MMSE.结论：CASIC-20具有良好的信度和效度,值得推广应用.

Objective:To assess the reliability and validity of Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument C-2.0 (CASI C-2.0). Methods:807 persons aged from 55 to 100 years were evaluated with CASI C-2.0. Results:CASI C-2.0 has excellent reliability. On validity, comparing with MMSE, CASI C-2.0 has a better specificity, and a same sensitivity. Conclusion: CASI C-2.0 has excellent reliability and validity. It is worthy to be applied for both clinical and epidemiological surveys.

基金项目：

作者简介：

参考文献：

1.Teng EL, Hasegaua K et al. The Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument (CASI), A Practicat test for cross-cultural epidemidogical studies of dementia. International Psychogeriatrics, 1994,6:45-46
2.HC Liu et al. Assessing cognitive abilities and dementia in a predomnantly illiterate population of older individuals in Kinmen. Psychological Medicine, 1994,24:763-770
3.李眉.知能筛查测验和三种文版的初测结果.中国临床心理学杂志,1994,2：69-73
4.Folstein MF et al. “Mini-Mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinicians. Journal Psychiatric Research, 1975,12:189-198
5.张明园.精神科评定量表手册.湖南科学技术出版社,1993
6．王家良.临床流行病学.临床科研设计、衡量与评价.上海科技出版社,1989

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】