设为首页 | 加入收藏
网站首页 本刊简介 编委会 投稿指南 过刊浏览 广告合作 网上订购 下载专区 联系我们  
必选数字记忆测验对伪装记忆损伤的鉴别作用
作者:高北陵  刘仁刚  李映平  盛璐 
单位:深圳市康宁医院医学鉴定科 广东深圳 518003 
关键词:脑外伤 数字记忆测验 伪装 记忆 
分类号:G449.5
出版年,卷(期):页码:2001,9(4):244-247
摘要:

目的:探讨Hiscock必选数字记忆测验对伪装记忆缺损的作用,并确定该测验判定伪装记忆缺损的划界分。方法:以66名不同损伤程度的非赔偿性脑外伤患者及24名赔偿性脑外伤伴有伪装智力低下者为研究对象,并与58名正常人作对照,对各组的必选数字记忆测验结果进行方差分析、计算累计百分率,并对伪装划界分作判定分析。结果:伪装组回答正确数与对照组及3个非伪装组之间差异均有非常显著性;容易条目的回答正确数小于等于11,或者困难条目的回答正确数小于等于7,可判定为伪装。判定的总正确率为98.6%,假阳性率为1.4%。结论:必选数字记忆测验是鉴别伪装记忆缺损的有效的评定工具。

Objective:To explore the validity of Hiscock and Hiscock's Forced-Choice Digit Memory Test (HDMT) in detecting dissimulation of memory deficit.Methods:Group comparisons were conducted.The performance of 24 subjects with compensation were compared to that of 66 subjects without compensation and 58 normal controls.Results:There were a significant differences between dissimulating group and other groups.The accuracy of distinction was 98.6% when the cut off scores of HDMT was 11 for easy items and 7 for difficult items.Conclusion:HDMT was useful for detecting true memory deficit as well as dissimulation.

基金项目:
作者简介:
参考文献:

[1] 高北陵.颅脑创伤后智力损伤鉴定中伪装的评估.中国临床心理学杂志,2001,3:233-236
[2] Hiscock M,Hiscock CK.Refining the forced-choice method for the detection of malingering.Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology,1989,11(6):967-974
[3] Slick D,Hopp G,Strauss E,et al.Detecting dissimulation:profiles of simul ated malingerers,traumatic brain-injury patients,and normal controls on a revi sed version of Hiscock and Hiscock's forced-choice memory test.Journal of Clini cal and Experimental Neuropsychology,1994,16(3):472-481
[4] 刘仁刚,高北陵,李映平,等.Hiscock 二氏必选数字记忆测验的前期试用.中国临床心理学杂志,2001,3:173-175
[5] 裘法祖,孟承伟.外科学.第二版.北京人民卫生出版社,1983
[6] 高北陵,唐卓如,陆亚文,等.颅脑外伤后智力损伤鉴定中伪装坏的临床资料分析.临床精神医学杂志,2001,11(3):148-151
[7] Iverson GL.Qualitative aspects of malingered memory deficits.Brain Inj,19 95,9(1):35-40

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【加入收藏
您是第访问者

《中国临床心理学杂志》编辑部
地址:湖南省长沙市中南大学湘雅二医院内, 410011
电 话:0731-85292472    电子邮件:cjcp_china@163.com
本系统由北京博渊星辰网络科技有限公司设计开发 技术支持电话:010-63361626