中国临床心理学杂志

伪装与非伪装脑外伤患者瑞文标准推理测验结果分析

作者：丁树明高北陵刘仁刚李映萍盛璐

分类号：G449.4

出版年,卷(期):页码：2002,10(2):97-99

摘要：

目的:探讨瑞文标准推理测验对受试者成绩真实性的评估价值。方法:比较分析伪装与非伪装两组脑外伤患者瑞文测验的五个分测验分、总分及测验斜率的复相关系数的差异及其特征。结果:①两组患者A、B、C、D四个分测验及总分的均数差异均有显著性;分测验E差异无显著性。②以P＜0.05为水准,伪装组中测验斜率值(R₂)＜0.648者显著多于非伪装者;而非伪装组中测验斜率值≥0.648者显著多于伪装者。结论:瑞文标准推理测验各分测验成绩的梯度变化及斜率值的显著水准对受试成绩真实性评估有一定的参考价值。

Objective:To evaluate Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices (RSPM) for assessing validity of test performance.Methods:To compare the results of RSPM between head injured patients with and without malingering.Results:①There were significant differences in the performance between the two groups of patients in subtests A,B,C and D of RSPM.There was no significant difference on subtest E.②Based on P＜0.05,the number of malingering patients with an obliquity (R₂)0.648 were significantly more than that of the non-malingerers.By contrast,the number of non-malingerers patients with an obliquity ≥0.648 were significantly more than that of the malingerers.Conclusion:The progressive decrease on the 5 subtests and obliquity rate of RSPM may aid in assessing validity of test performance.

基金项目：

作者简介：

参考文献：

[1] 高北陵,唐卓如,陆亚文,等.颅脑外伤后智力损伤鉴定中伪装坏的临床资料分析.临床精神医学杂志,2001,11(3):148-151
[2] Iverson GL.Qualitative aspects of malingered memory deficits.Brain Inj,1995,9(1):35-40
[3] Hiscock M,Hiscock CK.Refining the forced-choice method for the detecti on of malingering.Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology,1989,11(6):967-974
[4] 刘仁刚、高北陵、李映平,等.Hiscock 二氏必选数字记忆测验的前期试用.中国临床心理学杂志,2001,3:173-175
[5] 高北陵、刘仁刚、李映萍,等.必选数字记忆测验对伪装记忆损伤的鉴别作用.中国临床心理学杂志,2001,4:245-248
[6] Mittenberg W,Azrin R,Millsaps C,et al.Identification of malingered head injury on the Wechsler Memory Scal-Revised.Psychol Assess,1993,5:34-40
[7] Iverson GL,Franzen MD.The recognition memory test,Digit span,and Knox Cube Test as markers of malingered memory impairment.Assessment,1994,1:323-334
[8] 北京师范大学心理系.瑞文标准推理测验手册.北京:北京师范大学出版,1988
[9] 裘法祖,孟承伟.高等医药院校教材:外科学,第3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,1991.253-263.

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】