设为首页 | 加入收藏
网站首页 本刊简介 编委会 投稿指南 过刊浏览 广告合作 网上订购 下载专区 联系我们  
中文MMPI与MMPI-2临床量表一致性研究
作者:史占彪  张建新  郭念锋 
单位:中国科学院心理研究所心理健康重点实验室  北京 100101 
关键词:MMPI MMPI-2 编码类型符合率 临床量表 
分类号:B841
出版年,卷(期):页码:2003,11(4):241-244
摘要:

目的:考察MMPI与MMPI-2临床量表的一致性程度。方法:采用MMPI与MMPI-2复合问卷,对236名被试进行测试,其中含186名精神科住院患者(精神分裂症、心境障碍、神经症)和50名正常被试。结果:相关分析提示两问卷间各对应量表具有高相关性;对于236名被试,编码总符合率达到90.3%,其中单点编码符合率81.6%,两点编码符合率65.8%,三点编码符合率49.2%,高分编码符合率为64%;那些两点编码不符合的问卷中,96.4%具有同一个编码量表。给以限制性定义以后,两点编码符合率达到82.8%。新常模的使用及T分形式的改变,对于两问卷编码类型符合率没有显著影响。结论:可以推论,中文MMPI与MMPI-2临床量表具有较高程度的延续性,中文MMPI与MMPI-2在临床使用上具有一定的可比性。

Objective:To examine the degree of consistency between the Chinese MMPI and MMPI-2 in clinical scales.Methods:236 subjects (including 186 schizophrenia, affective disorder,and neuroses patients and 50 normal people) completed MMPI/MMPI-2 Complex Inventory.Results:The concordance rate for total code types was 90.3%;and the concordance rate for 1-point, 2-point, 3-point and elevated code types were 81.6%, 65.8%, 49.2%, 64% respectively.96.4% of subjects with incongruent 2-point code types had one scale in common in their MMPI and MMPI-2 code types. For well-defined 2-point code types,the concordances was 82.8%. The difference in code types congruence caused by the use of uniform T-scores and new norms in MMPI-2 were not very great.Conclusion: All these results showed the good consistency between the Chinese MMPI and MMPI-2 in clinical scales.

基金项目:
中国科学院知识创新工程重点资助(KSCX2-2-03)
作者简介:
参考文献:

[1] Butcher JN,Rouse SV.Personality: individual differences and clinical assessment.Annual Review Of Psychology,1996,47,87-111
[2] King TZ,Fennell EB,Bauer R,et al.MMPI-2 profiles of patients with intractable epilepsy.Archives Of Clinical Neuropsychology,2002,17:583-593
[3] Sharpe JP,Desai S.The Revised Neo Personality Inventory and the MMPI-2 Psychopathology Five in the prediction of aggression.Personality and Individual Differences,2001,31:505-518
[4] Alexander AV.The MMPI and chronic pain : a conceptual analysis of a long-standing but complicated relationship.Clinical Psychology Review,2000,20(5):533-599
[5] 全国协作组.明尼苏达多项人格调查表在我国修订经过及使用评价.心理学报,1982,4:449-457
[6] Butch JN,Dahlsrorm WG,Graham JR,et al.MMPI-2: Manual for administration and scoring.Minnesota Press,1989
[7] 张建新,宋维真,张妙清.简介新版明尼苏达多项个性调查表(MMPI-2)及其在中国大陆和香港地区的标准化过程.中国心理卫生杂志,1999,1(13):20-23
[8] 张建新,宋维真.新版明尼苏达多项个性调查表(MMPI-2)中国大陆简体字版用户使用指导手册.中国科学院心理研究所,1999
[9] Edwards DW,Morrison TL,Weissman HN.The MMPI and MMPI-2 in an outpatient sample: Comparisons of code types,validity scales and clinical scales.Journal of Personality Assessment,1993,61:1-18
[10] Dahlstrom WG.Comparability of two-point high code patterns from original MMPI norms to MMPI-2 norms for the restandardization sample.Journal of Personality Assessment,1992,59:153-164
[11] Edwards DW,Morrison TL,Weissman HN.Uniform versus linear T scores on the MMPI-2/MMPI in an outpatient psychiatric sample: Differential contributions.Psychological Assessment,1993,5:499-500
[12] Graham JR,Timbrook RE,Ben-porath YS,et al.Code type congruence between MMPI and MMPI-2: Separating fact from artifact.Journal of Personality Assessment,1991,57:205-215

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【加入收藏
您是第访问者

《中国临床心理学杂志》编辑部
地址:湖南省长沙市中南大学湘雅二医院内, 410011
电 话:0731-85292472    电子邮件:cjcp_china@163.com
本系统由北京博渊星辰网络科技有限公司设计开发 技术支持电话:010-63361626