中国临床心理学杂志

Marks恐怖强迫量表在中国应用的信度效度研究

作者：尹平¹ 赵耕源² 周迁漳²

单位：1. 广州市第一人民医院广东广州 510180
2. 中山医科大学附三医院

关键词：Obsessive-compulsive Disorder(OCD) Phobia Rating Scale Reliability Validity

分类号：G449.7

出版年,卷(期):页码：2003,11(2):113-115

摘要：

Objective:To evaluate the reliability and validity of the MSCPOR used in China.Methods :45 subjects with OCD, 35 subjects with phobias and 35 subjects with anxiety were selected as patient group, and 44 healthy persons were selected as control group.All subjects were rated according to the Chinese version of the MSCPOR, the Yale -Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS)and the Hamilton Anxiety Scale(HAMA).Two or three weeks after the first rating,16 health persons were re =rated by MSCPOR;12 patients were re -rated withMSCPOR, Y-BOCS and HAMA.15 subjects were rated with MSCPOR and scored by two independent raters at the same time.Results:Test -retest reliability was0.72～0.99 ;the homogeneity reliability(Chronbach' s α)in the OCD group were0.82 ～0.88 and in phobias group0.78～0.82 ;Spearman correlation coefficients were0.35 ～0.94 in OCD group and0.30～0.84 in phobias group ;the inter -rater reliability(kappa index)were0.53 ～ 1.For validity,correlation coefficients(γ)among different dimension of MSCPOR in OCD group was0.36～0.92 and0.10～0.80 in phobias group.Spearman correlation coefficients between MSCPOR vs Y-BOCS scores andMSCPOR vs HAMA were0.62 and0.41～0.44.The results of discriminate analysis showed that diagnosis error for MSCPOR was 40.1%.Conclusion:The reliability and validity of MSCPOR used in China were satisfactory ;MSCPOR isn' t a suitable instrument for diagnosis but good for symptom assessment.

Objective:To evaluate the reliability and validity of the MSCPOR used in China.Methods :45 subjects with OCD, 35 subjects with phobias and 35 subjects with anxiety were selected as patient group, and 44 healthy persons were selected as control group.All subjects were rated according to the Chinese version of the MSCPOR, the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS)and the Hamilton Anxiety Scale(HAMA).Two or three weeks after the first rating,16 health persons were re =rated by MSCPOR;12 patients were re-rated withMSCPOR, Y-BOCS and HAMA.15 subjects were rated with MSCPOR and scored by two independent raters at the same time.Results:Test-retest reliability was0.72～0.99 ;the homogeneity reliability(Chronbach' s α)in the OCD grouPwere0.82 ～0.88 and in phobias group0.78～0.82 ;Spearman correlation coefficients were0.35 ～0.94 in OCD grouPand0.30～0.84 in phobias grouP;the inter-rater reliability(kappa index)were0.53 ～ 1.For validity,correlation coefficients(γ)among different dimension of MSCPOR in OCD grouPwas0.36～0.92 and0.10～0.80 in phobias group.Spearman correlation coefficients between MSCPOR vs Y-BOCS scores andMSCPOR vs HAMA were0.62 and0.41～0.44.The results of discriminate analysis showed that diagnosis error for MSCPOR was 40.1%.Conclusion:The reliability and validity of MSCPOR used in China were satisfactory ;MSCPOR isn' t a suitable instrument for diagnosis but good for symptom assessment.

基金项目：

作者简介：

参考文献：

[1] 12地区精神疾病流行学调查组.12 地区神经症流行学调查.中华神经精神科杂志,1986,19:87-90
[2] Sasson Y,Zohar J,Chopra,et al.Epidemiology of obsessive-compulsive disorder:a world view.J Clin Psychiatry,1997,58(suppl:7-10)
[3] Stein MB,Forde DR,Anderson G,et al.Obsessive-compulsive disorder in the communtity:an epidemiologic survey with clinical reappraisal.Am J Psychiatry,1997,154:1120-1126
[4] Dick CL,Sowa B,Bland RC,et al.Phobia disorder.Acta Psychiatr Scand 1994,376(suppl):30-44
[5] Teresa A.Pigott.Epidemiology of Anxiety disorder.J Clin Psychiatry,1999,60(suppl):4-15
[6] 张明圆主编.精神科评定量表手册.长沙:湖南科技出版社,1993
[7] Pato MT,Pigott TL,Hill JL,et al.Controled comparison of buspirone and clomipramine in obsessive-compulsive disorder.Am J Psychiatry,1991,148:127-129
[8] Versiani M.Pharmacotherapy of social phoia.Br J Psychiatry,1992,161:353-356
[9] 费立鹏.西方量表译本的评价和修订.国外医学.精神病学分册,1987,3:135-144

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】