中国临床心理学杂志

中学生学业能力倾向测验的效度研究

作者：张月娟¹ 龚耀先²

单位：1. 河北师范大学教育科学学院河北石家庄 050091
2. 中南大学湘雅二医院湖南长沙 410011

分类号：G449.5

出版年,卷(期):页码：2004,12(3):221-225

摘要：

目的：对中学生学业能力倾向测验进行效度研究。方法：确定效度检验指标，采集数据，使用SPSS11.0和Amos4.0软件对所得数据进行分析。结果：(1)探索性因素分析表明各分测验对基本能力因子均有中度以上的负荷，抽取的三个因子解释了总方差的65.4%(A式)和66.2 %(B式)。验证性因素分析的拟合指数AGFI、CFI、NNFI均在0.96以上，RMSEA小于0.05,χ2 /df小于3。(2)测验总分与长 -鞍团体智力测验总分的相关为0.73(A式)和0.52(B式)，与教师评定的相关在0.51～0.67。(3)测验分数在不同年级之间、不同类学校之间，文理科班之间、男女生之间存在显著差异(P <0.05)。(4)学习成绩的回归分析可见，语文及数理分量表进入考试总成绩的回归方程，beta为0.27、0.49(A式)，0.39、0.23(B式)，回归方程的决定系数为0.46(A式)和0.2 9(B式)。结论：中学生学业能力倾向测验具有理想的结构效度和较好的效标关联效度，适用于中学生学业能力倾向的评量。

Objective: To test the validity of a new instrument, the Academic Aptitude Test for Middle School Student(AATMS).Methods:Data from 124 middle school students were analysed by SPSS11.0 and Amos4.0 program.Results:(1) Three factors were obtained in exploratory factor analyses, accounting for over 60% of the total variance.In comfirmatory factor analyses, the fit indexs AGFI, CFI, NNFI were over 0.96, RMSEA was below 0.05, and X²/ df was below 3.(2) Correlations between AATMS and CAITG(0.52~0.73),teacher.s rating(0.51~0.67) were substantially positive.(3) Therewere significant differences among schools, grades, classes, and sex.(4) Liner stepwise regression analysis showed that language and math sub-scales were important predictors(betas= 0.27, 0.49 and 0.39, 0.23 for AATMS- A, B respectively) for the total final exam scores, R²= 0.46, 0.29 for AATMS-A, B respectively.Conclusion: The structure of AATME is reasonable, and criterion-related validity were supported in present study.AATMS can be used for middle school students.

基金项目：

作者简介：

参考文献：

[1] 张月娟,龚耀先.中学生学业能力倾向测验的初步编制.中国临床心理学杂志,2002,12(1):1-5
[2] 龚耀先.长-鞍团体智力测验手册.湖南医科大学,1997
[3] 孟庆茂,侯杰泰.协方差结构模型与多层线性模型.北京师范大学心理计量与统计分析教研室,2001
[4] Frank J.Floyd, Keith F.Widaman.Factor analysis in development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments.Pchological Assessment, 1995,7(2): 286-299
[5] Van JW,Prooijen, Van WA,Der Kloot.Confirmatory analysis of exploratory obtained factor structures.Educational and Psychological Measurement.2001,61(5): 777-792
[6] 郑日昌.心理测量.湖南教育出版社,1987
[7] 洪炜,龚耀先.-般行政能力倾向测验的建构及信度、效度研究.中国临床心理学杂志, 2000,8(1):1-6
[8] 林传鼎,张厚粲,周谦,等.少年儿童学习能力测验的编制.北京师范学院教育科研所,1979
[9] 林崇德.学习与发展.北京师范大学出版社,1999
[10] 莫雷.中小学生语文阅读能力结构的发展特点.心理学报,1992,24(4):346-353
[11] Diane F.Halpern.Sex differences in intelligence, implication for education.Amercan Psychologist, 1997,52(10):1091-1102
[12] College Board.College-Bound Seniors: 1989 Profile of SAT and Achievement Test Takers.New York, 1989
[13] Leonard, David K, Jiang.Gender bias and the college predictions of the SATs: A cry of despair.Research in Higher Education, 1999,40(4): 375-407
[14] Beth CM.Mediators of gender differences in Mathematics College Entrance Test Scores: A comparison of spatial skills with internalized beliefs and anxieties.Developmental Pschology, 1997,33(4):669-80
[15] Gallagher AM, De Lisi, Richard, Holst PC,et al.Gender differences in advanced mathematical problem solving .Jorunal of Experimental Child Psychology, 2000, 75(3): 165-190
[16] James V,Mitchell JR.The Ninth Mental Measurements Yearbook.The Buros Institude of Mental Measurements of The University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 1985

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】