中国临床心理学杂志

精神分裂症患者防御方式及家庭背景因素研究

作者：曾昭祥姜文莲房茂盛李志成高新学

单位：山东省济宁市精神病防治院精神科山东济宁272051

分类号：R749.3

出版年,卷(期):页码：2004,12(1):76-78

摘要：

目的：探讨精神分裂症患者的防御方式、父母教养方式及亲密度和适应性的特点。方法：采用防御方式问卷(DSQ)、父母教养方式评价量表(EMBU)及家庭亲密度和适应性量表(中文版)(FACESII-CV)对80例精神分裂症患者(研究组)进行了问卷调查，并与80例正常受试者(对照组)加以比较。结果：①研究组中间型和不成熟防御方式因子分均明显高于对照组(P＜0.01)，而成熟防御方式因子分则明显低于对照组(P＜0.05)；②研究组父母的情感温暖因子分明显低于对照组(P＜0.01)，而惩罚及拒绝因子分则明显高于对照组(P＜0.01)，另外患者父亲的过分干涉及母亲的偏爱被试因子分亦均明显高于对照组(前者P＜0.01，后者P＜0.05)。③研究组家庭的实际亲密度、实际适应性、理想亲密度和理想适应性评分均明显低于对照组(P＜0.01)。结论：精神分裂症患者的防御方式、父母教养方式及亲密度和适应性与正常人有着明显的不同。

Objective:To investigate the defense style,parental rearing pattern and family adaptability and cohesion of patients with schizophrenia.Methods:Eighty patients with schizophrenia(the study group) and 80 normal controls(the control group) were assessed with the Defense Style Questionnaire(DSQ),Egna Minnenav Barndoms Uppfostran(EMBU)and Family Adaptability and Cohesion Scale(FACESII-CV).Results:①The scores of DSQ neurotic defense factor and immature mechanism factor were higher in the study group than in the control group (P＜0.01).The scores of mature mechanism factor in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P＜0.05).②Compared with normal controls,the scores of factors of being punished and refused of the study group were higher,at the same time,their scores of the over intervention of father and over partialness of mother were higher.However,the scores of factors of being cared was lower.③The fact and ideal scores of the family adaptability and cohesion in study group were lower than those of the control group (P＜0.01).Conclusion:There was significant difference between the schizophrenia and the normal group in the defense style,parental rearing pattern and family adaptability and cohesion.

基金项目：

作者简介：

参考文献：

[1] Smith C,Thienemann M,Steiner H.Defense style and adaptation in adolescents with depressions and eating diaorders.Acta Paedopsychiatr,1992,55:185-186.
[2] 辛雅丽.大学生的防御方式与心理健康.中国心理卫生杂志,1997,11(2):138-139.
[3] 梁军林,李乐石,刘珍妮,等.高中生的防御方式和应付方式与心理健康的相关性研究.中国心理卫生杂志,1999,13(3):146-147.
[4] 舒幼娥,孟宪璋.高中生心理防御机制研究.中国临床心理学杂志,2003,11(2):138-139.
[5] Pollock C,Andrews G.Defense styles associated with specific anxiety disorders.Am J Psychiatry,1989,146:1500-1502.
[6] Arrindell WA,Kwee MG,Methorst GJ,et al.Perceived parental rearing styles of agoraphobic and socially phobic in-patients.Br J Psychiatry,1989,155:526-535.
[7] 林雄标,胡赤怡,胡纪泽.强迫症与社交恐怖症的防御机制及其相关因素的比较研究.中华精神科杂志,2002,35(3):157-161.
[8] 董帝英,肖泽萍,陈珏,等.焦虑症的社会支持和防御方式的对照研究.上海精神医学,2001,13(2):89-92.
[9] 肖泽萍,张明岛,王振,等.有无遗传史的强迫症患者心理及生物指标比较研究.中国临床心理学杂志,2003,11(2):89-91.
[10] 中华医学会精神科分会编.中国精神障碍分类与诊断标准(第三版)(CCMD-3)(M).第1版.济南:山东科学技术出版社,2001.75-78.
[11] 路敦跃.防御方式问卷(DSQ).见汪向东主编.心理卫生评定量表手册.北京:中国心理卫生杂志,1999,7(增):46-53,122-129,101-109.
[12] Spinhoven P,Kooiman CG.Defense style in depressed and anxious psychiatric outpatients:an explorative study.J Nerv Ment Dis,1997,185(1):87-94.
[13] Robert GK,Linda DO.Rapid improvement in the defense style of depressed women and men.J Nerv Ment Dis,1996,184(4):358-361.
[14] 杨晓东,王松波,王庚鑫,等.精神分裂症患者的攻击行为与心理防御方式关系的研究.中国心理卫生杂志,1998,12(5):291.
[15] 陈仲庚主编.变态心理学.第一版.北京:人民卫生出版社,1985.25.
[16] 侯淑军,傅茂笋,李军.医学生学习成绩相关因素分析.中国心理卫生杂志,1999,13(3):155.
[17] 岳冬梅,李鸣杲,金魁和,等.父母教养方式:EMBU的初步修订及其在神经症患者的应用.中国心理卫生杂志,1993,7(2):97-101.
[18] Vaillant GE.Theoretical hierarchy of adaptive ego mechanisms:a 30-year follow-up of 30 men selected for psychological health.Arch Gen Psychiatry,1971,24(2):107-118.
[19] 费立鹏,沈其杰,郑延平.家庭亲密度和适应性量表和家庭环境量表的初步评价.中国心理卫生杂志,1991,5(5):198-202.

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】