中国临床心理学杂志

惊恐障碍患者防御方式的对照研究

分类号：R395.4

出版年,卷(期):页码：2006,14(2):134-135

摘要：

目的：探讨惊恐障碍患者的防御方式及其与焦虑抑郁、功能状况的关系。方法：采用防御方式问卷对47名伴或不伴广场恐怖的惊恐障碍患者和37名健康对照者评估其防御方式，同时以汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)、汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)评估其焦虑抑郁状态，并以功能大体评定量表评估近一周的社交职业功能水平。结果：①惊恐障碍组不成熟防御方式总分、投射、分裂、退缩和躯体化得分高于对照组(P＜0.05)；中间型防御方式总分、理想化、假性利他、伴无能之全能和交往倾向得分高于对照组(P＜0.05)；惊恐障碍组成熟防御方式总分、幽默得分显著低于对照组(P＜0.001)；②惊恐患者的不成熟防御方式总得分与受教育程度呈负相关(r=-0.357，P＜0.05)，交往倾向得分与功能大体评分呈负相关(r=-0.384，P＜0.01)。结论：惊恐障碍患者使用不成熟和中间防御方式增多，使用成熟防御减少。

Objective: To evaluate the defense mechanisms most frequently used by Chinese patients with panic disorder.Methods: Forty-seven panic patients with or without agoraphobia, and thirty-senven controls participated in the study.The Hamilton Depression Scale(HAMD, Hamilton Anxiety Scale(HAMA) and global assessment function(GAF) were applied to assess the severity of depression and anxiety symptoms and social and occupational function, respectively.Defensive Style Questionnaire(DSQ-88) was used to evaluate defense mechanisms.Results: Compared with controls, panic patients had higher scores in projection, splitting, regression, somatization and total scores of immature defenses and higher scores in idealization, pseudo-altruism, omnipotence-devaluation, attiliation and total scores of neurotic defenses(P＜0.05).Panic patients had lower scores in humor and total scores of mature defenses(P＜0.05).Total scores of immature defenses were negatively correlated to the degree of education, and scores of attiliation were negatively correlated to the higher scores of GAF(P＜0.05).Conclusion: Patients with panic disorder use more immature and neurotic defenses but less mature defenses.

基金项目：

深圳市科技局三项经费资助(项目号:200004035)

作者简介：

参考文献：

[1] Gorman JM.Anxiety disorder:introduction and overview.In Kaplan and sadock's.Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.Comprehensive textbook of psychiatry 7th ed,2000.1441-1444
[2] 宁布,尤红,孟宪璋.精神分裂症和神经症患者心理防御机制的对照研究.中国临床心理学杂志,2005,13(2):340-342
[3] Kipper L,Blaya C,Teruchkin B,et al.Brazilian patients with panic disorder:The use of defense mechanisms and their association with severity.J Nerv Ment Dis,2004,192:58-64
[4] 汪向东,王希林,马弘.心理卫生评定量表手册,增订版,北京:中国心理卫生杂志社,1999.115-120
[5] Albucher RC,Abelson JL,and Nesse RM.Defense Mechanism Changes in Successfully Treated Patients With Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.Am J Psychiatry,1998,155:558-559
[6] Kipper L,Blaya C,Teruchkin B,et al.Evaluation of Defense Mechanisms in Adult Patients With Panic Disorder:Before and After Treatment.J Nerv Ment Dis,2005,193(9):619-624

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】