中国临床心理学杂志

简易精神症状自陈量表的信度和效度

作者：黄志彪高北陵吴冬凌盛璐李映萍李学武

关键词：伪装精神症状评定量表信度效度

分类号：G449.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2007,15(3):227-229

摘要：

目的：检验简易精神症状自陈量表的信度和效度。方法：在精神医学鉴定对象、普通精神科患者及正常人三组人群中用该量表进行测试，部分测试对象同时实施MMPI，并间隔5-15日后予以重测。结果：①全量表的Cron-bach’sα系数为0.91；量表的分半信度为0.90；重测信度为0.73～0.98。②各因子与全量表总分相关在0.79～0.87之间；各因子之间相关在0.50～0.65之间。全量表总分与MMPI的Fake分量表相关系数为0.76；以专家评定为校标，量表判定伪装的总准确率为86.6%。结论：简易精神症状评定量表具有良好的信度和效度。

Objective: To examine the reliability and validity of self-report scale of brief psychopathological symptoms(SBPS). Methods: The reliability and validity of the scale were tested based on three groups of subjects, including the cases involved forensic problems, the patients with mental disorders and normal persons. Some of them were retested 5-15 days after first examination. Other subjects of them finished MMPI at the same time. Results: ①The Cronbach's α coefficients of SBPS was 0.91. The split-half reliability was 0.90. The test-retest reliability ranged from 0.73～0.98. ②The correlations between factors scores and the total scores ranged from 0.79 to 0.87. The correlations among the four factors scores, ranged from 0.50 to 0.65. Significant correlation was found between the total scores of SBPS and the fake scores of MMPI (r =0.76). Based on the experts diagnosis, the accuracy rate of SBPS for evaluating malingering was 86.6%. Conclusion: The SBPS has acceptable psychometrics properties on reliability and validity.

基金项目：

教育部留学回国人员科研启动基金(教外司留2001345)

作者简介：

参考文献：

[1] Miller HA.Examining the use of the M-FAST with criminal defendants incompetent to stand trial.Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol,2004,48(3):265-267
[2] Smith GP,Burger GK.Detection of malingering:validation of the Structured inventory of Malingered Symp tomatology(SIMS).J AM Acad Psychiatry Law,1997,25(2):183-189
[3] 高北陵,刘仁刚,李映萍,等.迫选数字记忆测验对伪装记忆损伤的鉴别作用.中国临床心理学杂志,2001,9(4):245-248
[4] 高北陵,杨蔚,丁树明,等.老年认知功能缺损者二项必选数字记忆测验结果分析.中国临床心理学杂志,2003,11(2):99-101
[5] 高北陵,唐卓如,陆亚文,等.颅脑外伤后智力评估中的伪装坏的临床资料分析.临床精神医学杂志,2001,9(3):148-151
[6] Rogers R,Sewell KW,Martin MA,et al.Detection of feigned mental disorder:.a meta-analysis of the MMPI-2 and malingering.Assessment,2003,10(2):166-177
[7] 金瑜主编.心理测量.上海:华东师范大学出版社,2001.106 139
[8] Jackson R1,Rogers R,Sewell KW.Forensic applications ofthe Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test:Screening for feigned disorders in competency to stand trial evaluations.Law Ham Behav,2005,29(2):199-210
[9] Loring DW,Lee GP,Meador KJ.Victoria symptom validity test performance in non-litigating epilepsy sugery candidates.J Clin Exp Neurepsychol,2005,27(5):610-617
[10] Veazey CH,Wagner AL,Hays JR,et al.Validity of the Miller forensic assesesement of symptoms test in psy-chiatric inpatients.Sychol Rep,2005,97(3):875-876

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】