设为首页 | 加入收藏
网站首页 本刊简介 编委会 投稿指南 过刊浏览 广告合作 网上订购 下载专区 联系我们  
简易心理状况评定量表Kessler10中文版的信度和效度评价
作者:周成超1  楚洁2  王婷3  彭倩倩4  何江江1  郑文贵1  刘冬梅1  王兴洲1  马宏峰1  徐凌忠1 
单位:1. 山东大学社会医学研究所 山东济南250012 
2.
 山东省疾病预防控制中心 山东济南250014 
3.
 北京大学公共卫生学院 
4.
 山东大学流行病与卫生统计研究所 
关键词:心理卫生 信度 效度 Kessler10 
分类号:B841
出版年,卷(期):页码:2008,16(6):627-629
摘要:

目的:评价Kessler10心理量表中文版的信度和效度。方法:以某综合性大学整群随机抽取的大学生为研究对象。使用Kessler10量表对其心理健康状况进行评定。结果:复测结果Kappa指数为0.703(P<0.001)。K10量表中文版的折半信度为0.7076(P<0.001),克朗巴赫α系数为0.8011(P<0.001)。经模型拟合,二阶双因子模型很好,模型拟合可接受。结论:Kessler10量表中文版具有较好的信度和效度,可以在中国人群中推广使用。

Objective:To test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of 10-item Kessler Scale(K10).Methods:871 undergraduates of a university were selected by random clustering sampling.The subjects were interviewed with?the K10.Results:The Kappa value of the test-retest output was 0.703(P<0.001);the split-half reliability coefficient was?0.7076(P<0.001) and the Cronbach’α coefficient was 0.8011(P<0.001).The two-class double factor model fits well.Conclusion:K10 has good reliability and validity,which is available for the evaluation of mental health status in Chinese?population.

基金项目:
山东省医药卫生科技发展计划项目(2007HW068)
作者简介:
参考文献:

[1] 徐凌忠,周成超,王建新,等.威海市居民心理健康状况及其影响因素.中国心理卫生杂志,2006,20(6):394-397
[2] Kessler R, Mroczek D. Final versions of our non-specific psychological distress scale. Ann Arbor (MI), Survey Re-search Center of the Institute for Social Research. University of Michigan,1994
[3] 徐凌忠,王建新,孙辉,等. Kessler 10在我国的首次应用研究及其重要意义.卫生软科学,2005,19(6):410-412
[4] Andrews G, Slade T. Interpreting scores on the Kessler population. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry Psychological Distress Scale (K10). Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health,2001,25:494-497
[5] 周世杰,龚耀先.龚氏记忆成套测验(儿童本)结构效度的验证性因素分析.中国临床心理学杂志,2006,14(3):241-243
[6] Australian bureau of statistics. Information Paper—Use of the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale in ABS Health Surveys,2003
[7] 2001 National Health Survey: Summary of results, Australia (cat. no.4364.0)
[8] Centre for population studies in epidemiology, department of human services South Australia. South Australian Health and Wellbeing Survey December,2000
[9] The Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10). Brief Re-ports, Center for Population studies in Epidemiology. Department of Human Services,2002.14
[10] Kessler RC, Andrews G, Colpe LJ, Hiripi E. Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in nonspecific psychological distress. Psychological Medicine,2002,32:959-976
[11] Victorian government department of human services. Victorian population health survey 2002. Selected findings. Printed by Prim Bound pty Ltd,2003
[12] 邢禾.大众结核病防治知识调查问卷的信度?效度评价.中国健康教育,2006,22(8):573-576
[13] 方积乾,陆盈.现代医学统计学.北京:人民卫生出版社,2002
[14] Robert TB, John B, Zachary S. Factor structure and interpretation of the K10. Psychological Assessment,2006,18(1):62-70
[15] 钟杰,秦漠,蔡文菁,等. Padua 量表在中国大学生人群中的修订.中国临床心理学杂志,2006,14(1):1-4

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【加入收藏
您是第访问者

《中国临床心理学杂志》编辑部
地址:湖南省长沙市中南大学湘雅二医院内, 410011
电 话:0731-85292472    电子邮件:cjcp_china@163.com
本系统由北京博渊星辰网络科技有限公司设计开发 技术支持电话:010-63361626