设为首页 | 加入收藏
网站首页 本刊简介 编委会 投稿指南 过刊浏览 广告合作 网上订购 下载专区 联系我们  
罗夏测验自主同一性量表的信度、效度研究
作者:彭红军1  孟宪璋2  龙英3  杨婵娟1 
单位:1. 广州市脑科医院 广东 广州 510370 
2.
 暨南大学附属第一医院心理精神科 广东 广州 510630 
3.
 广州市民政局精神病医院 
关键词:罗夏测验自主同一性量表 信度 效度 
分类号:G0449.1
出版年,卷(期):页码:2008,16(2):141-143
摘要:

目的:探讨罗夏测验自主同一性量表Mutuality of Autonomy Scale(MOA)在中国人群中的信度、效度。方法:符合CCMD-3的分裂症(偏执型)病人32例,躁狂症病人31例,抑郁症(单相)病人30例,及正常对照组32例,各组分别进行MOA评分,对照组一月后再次MOA评分,两不同记分者对同一记录分别MOA记分。结果:正常组MOA七等级及总相关系数为0.78-0.98(P<0.01),两记分者评分一致率在0.75-0.95,总一致率为0.91;MOA七变量可提取三个因素(DA、SI、SA;MC、OE;RA、DI),各因子负荷量均在0.50以上。七变量按三分法及七分法均能有效的区分被试是否有精神病。结论:罗夏测验自主同一性量表在中国人群中有较好的信度、效度。

Objective: Exploring the reliability and validity of object relations MOA scale.Methods: 32 schizophrenia patients,30 depression people,31mania patients were taken into groups,and 32 people in control group were taken,Patients taken must meet the CCMD-3 diagnosis criterion,Patients in different groups were evaluated by MOA,the control group were evaluated again after a month;two different surveyors evaluated the reactions of the same control group respectively.Results: There was a significant correlation between the two evaluations,the correlation coefficient are between 0.78 and 0.98(P<0.01);Two different surveyors evaluated the same control group and the coherence frequency is between 0.75and 0.95,the total coherence frequency is 0.91.The seven variables of MOA can reduce to three factors(DA、SI、SA;MC、OE;RA、DI);the three variables reduced by the seven variables of MOA and the seven ones can distinguish the people with mental disorders from the normal ones.Conclusion: Mutuality of Autonomy Scale(MOA) in Rorschach Test has good reliability and validity in Chinese people.

基金项目:
广州市医药卫生科技项目(2006-YB-112)
作者简介:
参考文献:

[1] Michaelst Clair 著.贾晓明,苏晓波译.第一版.现代精神分析的圣经-客体关系与自体心理学,2002
[2] Miltoln J,等著.施琪嘉,等译.第一版.精神分析导论.中国轻工业出版社,2005
[3] 盂宪璋.躯体化障碍与童年期创伤.中国临床心理学杂志,2002,10(3):183-188
[4] 王恒,田凌飞.边缘型人格障碍治疗中病人与治疗师之间关系的研究.中国临床心理学杂志,2006,14(4):419-420,423
[5] Blais MA,Hilsenroth MJ,Fowler JC,Conboy CA.A Rorsc bach exploration of the DSM-IV berderline personality dis order.Journal of Clinical Psychology,1999,55:563-572
[6] Richard MR,Rachel RA.A Rorsehach Assessment of Children's Mutulity of autonomy.Joumal of Personality Assessment,1985,49:1
[7] 唐洁.罗夏墨迹测验自主同一性量表(MOA)的研究.暨南大学硕士学位论文,2004
[8] Bueky R,Evolution.Abrief intellectual history of americal psychoanalysis during the past two decade.Am-J-Psychother,2003,57:(1):1-17
[9] Piper.Quality of object relations as a moderator of relationship between pattern of alliance and outcome in short-term individul psychotherapy J-Pets-Assess,2004,83(3):346-56
[10] Tramantuno.Discriminating among subgroups of borderline personality disorder.an assessment of object representations AM-J-Psychoanal,2003,63(2):149-75

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【加入收藏
您是第访问者

《中国临床心理学杂志》编辑部
地址:湖南省长沙市中南大学湘雅二医院内, 410011
电 话:0731-85292472    电子邮件:cjcp_china@163.com
本系统由北京博渊星辰网络科技有限公司设计开发 技术支持电话:010-63361626