中国临床心理学杂志

精神分裂症患者应对方式问卷的信度与效度

作者：童永胜¹ 王登峰² 安静¹

单位：1. 北京回龙观医院北京心理危机研究与干预中心北京 100096
2. 北京大学心理系北京 100871

分类号：G449.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2008,16(2):135-137

摘要：

目的:对适合精神分裂症患者使用的应对方式问卷进行信度效度检验和项目分析。方法:219名精神分裂症患者完成应对方式问卷,其中44名患者5周后再次完成问卷。结果:各项目在所属分量表上的完全标准化因子负载系数为0.31～0.77,两个二阶因子为"问题指向的应对"和"情绪指向的应对"。四个分量表的α系数为0.74～0.92,间隔5周的重测相关系数为0.45～0.70。有53个项目的鉴别指数在0.30～0.56之间。结论:该应对方式问卷在精神分裂症患者中施测的信效度良好,符合心理测量学的基本要求。

Objective: To assess the reliability and validity of the Ways of Coping Questionnaire for schizophrenic patients.Methods: The self-completion Ways of Coping Questionnaire for schizophrenic patients was completed by 219 inpatients with schizophrenia whose symptoms were relatively stable,and 44 randomly selected patients completed the questionnaire a second time five weeks after they first completed the questionnaire.Results: The completely standardized solutions were 0.31～0.77.The two second-order factors were "problem-focused coping" and "emotion-focused coping".Cronbach α coefficients of the four coping categories assessed by the questionnaire ('problem solving','avoidance','cognitive adjustment',and 'emotional adjustment') were 0.92,0.84,0.83 and 0.74,respectively.The test-retest reliabilities (using Pearson correlation coefficient) of the four categories were 0.70,0.45,0.46 and 0.62,respectively.The discriminant power of items were 0.30～0.56,except for one item.Conclusion: The reliability and validity of the Ways of Coping Questionnaire for patients with schizophrenia are satisfactory,which meets the needs of psychometrics.

基金项目：

国家自然科学基金(30270469)

作者简介：

参考文献：

[1] Folkman S,Lazarus RS,Gruen RJ,et al.Appraisal,coping,health status.and psychological symptoms.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1986,50(3):571-579
[2] Horan WP,Blanchoard JJ.Emotional responses to psychosocial stress in schizophrenia:the role of individual differences in affective traits and coping.Schizophrenia Research,2003,60(2-3):271-283
[3] Carver CS,Scheier MF,Weintraub JK.Assessing coping strategies:A theoretically based approach.Joumal of Personality and Social Psychology,1989,56(2):267-283
[4] 肖计划.应付方式问卷.见:汪向东主编.心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版).北京:中国心理卫生杂志社,1999.109-115
[5] 侯玉波,张棼.青少年应对方式量表的修订.中国临床心理学杂志,2006,14(6):566-567
[6] 王娜,李占江,杨清燕,等.精神分裂症患者非理性信念、应付方式及其关系研究.中国临床心理学杂志,2007,15(2):1810-182
[7] 童永胜,王登峰,曹英.精神分裂症患者应对方式的结构(英文).中国神经精神疾病杂志,2006,32(5):385-391
[8] Amirkhan JH.A factor analytically derived measure of coping:The Coping Strategy Indictor.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1990,59(5):1066-1074
[9] 陈树林,李凌江,骆宏.成年人应对方式量表的初步编制.中国临床心理学杂志,2004,12(2):123-125
[10] McCrae RR,Costa PT.Personality,coping,and coping effectiveness in and adult sample.Journal of personality,1986,54(2):385-405
[11] 韦有华,汤盛钦.COPE量表的初步修订.心理学报,1996,28(4):380-387
[12] Loranger AW,Lenzenweger MF,Gartner AF,et al.Traitstate artifacts and the diagnosis of personality disorders.Archives of General Psychiatry,1991,48(8):720-728

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】