|
摘要：
|
|
目的：编制青少年网络游戏认知偏差量表(Online Game Cognitive Distortions Scale,OGCDS),并检验其信效度。方法：在117名青少年中进行初测,确定17个条目的正式版本后以分层整群取样法,随机抽取广东省在校中学生495名,分别施测青少年网络游戏认知偏差量表、网络游戏-认知成瘾量表以及Young的网络成瘾诊断问卷,考察青少年网络游戏认知偏差量表的信度和效度。结果：探索性因素分析结果显示:青少年网络游戏认知偏差量表涵盖4个维度,分别是沉湎、全或无思维、在线安慰和短期思维,可解释总方差72.626%,各条目的因子负荷在0.490～0.886之间。验证性因素分析结果表明:四因素模型的拟合指数分别为:χ2=141.586,NFI=0.909,IFI=0.952,CFI=0.952,RMSEA=0.063。量表的重测信度r=0.753,P<0.01,各维度和总量表的α系数为0.740～0.904。青少年网络游戏认知偏差量表总分、各维度分与网络游戏-认知成瘾量表总分呈正相关(r=0.540～0.728,P<0.01),与Young的网络成瘾诊断问卷也呈正相关(r=0.283～0.413,P<0.01)。结论：青少年网络游戏认知偏差量表有良好的信度和效度。
|
|
Objective:To develop an Online Game Cognitive Distortions Scale(OGCDS)and examine its applicability in Chinese adolescents.Methods:A pretest was given to 117 middle school students to determine a 17-item version of OGCDS.A sample of 495 middle school students were required to complete OGCDS,Internet Game Cognition Addiction Scale and Young's Internet Addiction Disorder scale.Reliability and validity of OGCDS were analyzed.Results:①The retest reliability,split-half and Cronbach's α reliability coefficients of the total scale were 0.753,0.827 and 0.904,respectively.②Scores of the total scale and each subscale were both significantly correlated with scores of IGCAS and IAD scale at 0.01 levels(r=0.540～0.728;r=0.283～0.413).③Four factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis,explaining 72.626% of the total variance;the load of each item varied from 0.490～0.886.④Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed that standard measurement model fit data well:χ2=141.586,NFI=0.909,IFI=0.952,CFI=0.952,RMSEA=0.063.Conclusion:Reliability and validity of OGCDS is corresponded with psychometric standard.
|
|
基金项目：
|
|
国家社会科学基金项目(07CSH030);广东省哲学社科“十五”规划项目(05SXY004)
|
|
作者简介：
|
|
|
|
参考文献：
|
|
[1] Young KS.Internet Addiction:A New Clinical Phenomenon and Its Consequences.American Behavioral Scientist,2004,48(4):402-415
[2] 罗江洪,吴汉荣.中学生网络游戏成瘾影响因素分析.中国社会医学杂志,2007,24(3):171-173
[3] 黄峥,钱铭怡,易春丽,等.电脑游戏成瘾与网络关系成瘾倾向相关因素比较.中国临床心理学杂志,2006,14(3):244-247
[4] Davis RA.A cognitive -behavioral model of pathological internet use.Computers in Human Behavior,2001,17:187-195
[5] Beck(翟书涛).认知疗法:基础与应用.北京:中国轻工业出版社,2001
[6] Davis RA.Validation of a new scale for measuring problematic internet use:Implications for pre-employment screening.Cyberpsychology and Behavior,2002,5(4):331-345
[7] Young KS.Cognitive behavior therapy with internet addicts:Treatment outcomes and I mplications.Cyber Psychology and Behavior,2007,10(5):671-679
[8] Caplan SE.Problematic Internet use and psychosocial wellbeing:Development of a theory-based cognitive-behavioral measurement instrument.Computers in Human Behavior,2002,18:553-575
[9] LaRose R,Mastro D,Eastin MS.Understanding internet usage:A social -cognitive approach to uses and gratific ations.Social Science Computer Review,2001,19:395-413
[10] Young KS.Intervention for pathological and deviant be havior within an online community.American Asychological Association in San Francisco,CA,1997
[11] 李欢欢,王力,王嘉琦.大学生网络游戏认知-成瘾量表的初步编制及信效度检验.中国心理卫生杂志,2008,22(5):319-322
[12] Lisa MN.Cognitive distortions in the dual diagnosis of PTSD and substance use disorder.Cognitive Therapy and Research,2004,28(2):159-172
[13] Sirous M,Alec G,Andrea EK,Martin RY.Relationships between functional and dysfunctional impulsivity,delay discounting and cognitive distortions.Personality and Individual Differences,2007,43(6):1517-1528
|
|
服务与反馈：
|
|
【文章下载】【加入收藏】
|
|
|
|