|
目的：比较不同剂量吗啡皮下注射及给药方式(每日三次给药与每日一次给药)对Sprague-Dawley大鼠运动敏感化的影响。方法：实验大鼠共分为五组,即生理盐水组、吗啡每日一次皮下注射组(1mg/kg组、3mg/kg组及10mg/kg组)以及吗啡每日三次皮下注射组(10mg/kg/次),每组8只大鼠。连续用药7天,隔日检测大鼠自发活动,然后停止药物处理,停药7天后每组大鼠予以吗啡3mg/kg皮下注射并检测大鼠自发活动。结果：吗啡每日一次皮下注射组中,各剂量组大鼠的运动敏感化均能顺利表达。吗啡每日三次皮下注射组大鼠的运动敏感化表达受到了抑制。结论：低剂量吗啡同样诱发运动敏感化,提示低剂量吗啡也会出现觅药动机敏感化,因此不要冒险尝试毒品即便是低剂量毒品;当每日一次间断用药时,运动敏感化更容易表达,提示负性强化可能是运动敏感化的调节机制之一。
|
|
Objective:To study the effects of different doses and patterns of morphine injection(s.c.once per day or s.c.thrice per day)on locomotor sensitization to morphine in Sprague-Dawley rat.Methods:40 male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned to five groups(n=8 per group):Saline group(saline,1 ml/kg,s.c.once per day),Morphine groups(morphine,s.c.once per day,Mor-1:1mg/kg;Mor-2:3mg/kg;Mor-3:10mg/kg.)and Mor-4 group(morphine,10mg/kg,s.c.thrice per day).Each rat was treated with saline or morphine for 7 days and locomortor activity was measured every two days.7 days after saline or morphine treatment,all groups received a challenge injection of morphine(3mg/kg,s.c.)and locomortor activities were tested immediately after injection.Results:Locomotor sensitization to morphine developed and expressed successfully in morphine groups(morphine,s.c.once per day)and expression of locomotor sensitization in Mor4 group was suppressed.Conclusion:Low dose of morphine enables to induce sensitization of incentive salience attribution to the compulsive drug-seeking.Thus drug taking,even of low dose,is not encouraged to try.Intermittent morphine treatment once per day facilitates the expression of locomotor sensitization compared with morphine treatment thrice per day,which implicates that negative reinforcement may be a candidate mechanism underlying locomotor sensitization.
|
|
[1] Robinson TE,Berridge KC.The neural basis of drug craving:An incentive -sensitization theory of addiction.Brain Res Brain Res Rev,1993,18(3):247-291
[2] Robinson TE,Berridge KC.Addiction.Annu Rev Psychol,2003,54:25-53
[3] Paulson PE,Camp DM,Robinson TE.Time course of transient behavioral depression and persistent behavioral sensitization in relation to regional brain monoamine concentr ations during amphetamine withdrawal in rats.Psychopharmacology(Berl),1991,103(4):480-492
[4] Vezina P.Sensitization of midbrain dopamine neuron reactivity and the self-administration of psychomotor stimulant drugs.Neurosci Biobehav Rev,2004,27(8):827-839
[5] Adler J.Chemotaxis in bacteria.Science,1966,153(737):708-716
[6] Qi YL,Adler J.Salt taxis in Escherichia coli bacteria and its lack in mutants.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA,1989,86(21):8358-8362
[7] Kelley AE.Memory and addiction:shared neural circuitry and molecular mechanisms.Neuron,2004,44(1):161-179
[8] Samaha AN,Li Y,Robinson TE.The rate of intravenous cocaine administration determines susceptibility to sensitization.J Neurosci,2002,22:3244-3250
[9] Montague PR,Hyman SE,Cohen JD.Computational roles for dopamine in behavioural control.Nature,2004,431(7010):760-767
[10] Brebner K,Wong TP,Liu L,Liu Y,et al.Nucleus accumbens long-term depression and the expression of behavioral sensitization.Science,2005,310(5752):1340-1343
[11] Dong Y,Saal D,Thomas M,Faust R,et al.Cocaine induced potentiation of synaptic strength in dopamine neurons:Behavioral correlates in GluRA(-/-)mice.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA,2004,101(39):14282-14287
[12] Kauer JA,Malenka RC.Synaptic plasticity and addiction.Nat Rev Neurosci,2007,8(11):844-858
[13] Wolf ME.The role of excitatory amino acids in behavioral sensitization to psychomotor stimulants.Prog Neurobiol,1998,54(6):679-720
[14] Koob GF,Le Moal M.Addiction and the brain antireward system.Annu Rev Psychol,2008,59:29-53
[15] Schulteis G,Ahmed SH,Morse AC,Koob GF,et al.Conditioning and opiate withdrawal.Nature,2000,405(6790):1013-1014
|