中国临床心理学杂志

以一般性人际关系维度构建家庭关系功能量表

作者：刘曦¹ 2 张建新² 叶界佑²

单位：1. 中国劳动关系学院北京100048
2. 中国科学院心理研究所北京100101

关键词：家庭功能独生子女信度效度

分类号：B841.7

出版年,卷(期):页码：2011,19(5):612-614

摘要：

目的：改编适合中国文化背景的家庭关系功能量表。方法：以Shek等人编制的家庭功能量表为基础，结合访谈结果确定量表项目。采用探索性因素分析构建量表的一般性人际关系三因子维度，用验证性因素分析检验量表的效度并进行信度分析。结果：最终形成30个项目的家庭关系功能量表；EFA结果得到3个因子：情感性、控制性和行动力；CFA表明三因子模型在不同评价者和不同家庭关系上拟合良好；同质信度为0.81-0.93，分半信度为0.80-0.94。结论：改编的家庭关系功能量表具有良好的信效度符合心理测量学基本要求。

Objective:develop a family relationship functioning scale in Chinese culture.Methods:Based on generalinterpersonal dimension and combined with the interviews,a pro-questionnaire was developed;EFA and CFA wereused to test the validity of the scale.Results:30-item questionnaire was formed;EFA indicated that there were three factors,namely:affect,control and activity,which explained 53.52% of total variance with loading between 0.40-0.81;CFAshowed the 3-factor model in different evaluators and in different relationships were well fitted;Cronbach’s α was 0.81-0.93,and split-half coefficient was 0.80-0.94.Conclusion:The structure,reliability and validity of family relationshipfunction scale meets the need of psychometrics.

基金项目：

“中华全国总工会委托课题”部分研究成果(09QW013)

作者简介：

参考文献：

[1] Schwab JJ,Gray-Ice HM.Family functioning-the generalliving systems research model.New York 23;[3] Spring Street:Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers,2000.19-20;
[2] Beavers WR,Hampson R.The beavers systems model offamily functioning.Journal of Family Therapy,2000,22(2):128-143;
[3] Olson DH,Portner J,Lavee Y.FACES III.St.Paul,MN:Family Social Science,University of Minnesota,1985;
[4] Shek.Family functioning and psychological well being,school adjustment,and problem behavior in Chinese adolescentswith and without economic disadvantage.GeneticPsychol,2002,163(4):497-500;
[5] Miller IW,Ryan CE.The McMaster App roach to Families:theory,assessment,treatment and research.J Fam Ther,2000,22:16;[8] -189;
[6] Skinner H,Steinhauer P.Family assessment measure andprocess model of family functioning.Journal of FamilyTherapy,2000,22(2):190-210;
[7] Walsh F.Normal family processes.New York:Guilford,2003.514-547;
[8] Ohannessian CM,Lerner JV,et al.Adolescent-parent discrepanciesin perceptions of family functioning and earlyadolescent self-competence.International Journal of Be-havioral Development,2000,24(3):362-372;
[9] Cole DA,McPherson AE.Relation of family subsystems toadolescent depression:Implementing a new family assessmentstrategy.Journal of Family Psychology,1993,7:119-133;
[10] Gondoli D,Jacob T.Factor structure within and across threefamily assessment procedures.Journal of Family Psychology,1993,6:278-289;
[11] Michael J.Family assessment:Instrument dimensionalityand correspondence across family reporters.Journal ofFamily Psychology,1999,13(3):339-354;
[12] William L.Cook,the SRM approach to family assessment.European Journal of Psychological Assessment,2005,21(4):216-225;
[13] Benjamin LS.Introduction to the special section on structuralanalysis of social behavior.Journal of Consulting andClinical Psychology,1996,64:1203-1212;
[14] Hayden LC,Schiller M,Dickstein S,Seifer R,et al.Levelsof family assessment:I.Family,marital,and parent-childinteraction.Journal of Family Psychology,1998,12:7-22

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】