中国临床心理学杂志

应用项目反应理论对CCMD-3人格障碍筛查问卷A类分量表的项目功能分析

单位：1. 深圳大学应用心理学研究与咨询中心广东深圳518060
2. 四川大学华西医院心理卫生中心四川成都610041
3. 江苏警官学院

分类号：B841.7;R749.91

出版年,卷(期):页码：2011,19(3):312-315

摘要：

目的：对CCMD-3人格障碍筛查问卷(Personality Disorder Screening Questionnaire of CCMD-3，PDQC-3)A类人格障碍分量表分型评估和维度评估进行项目功能分析。方法：采用Samejima等级反应模型(GRM)分析3128例被试(大学生，劳教戒毒人员，监狱服刑人员，神经症缓解期患者，抑郁症缓解期患者，精神分裂症康复期患者)的PDQC-3作答数据，根据项目的区分度参数、难度参数、项目特征曲线(ICC)和项目信息曲线(IIC)对项目进行功能分析。结果: ①A类人格障碍分型评估的项目功能分析结果: 偏执型12个项目中11个项目评估效力较佳，1个中等，分裂样型16个项目评估效力均较佳；②A类人格障碍维度评估的项目功能分析结果: 除情感淡漠维度(维度2)有2个项目、孤独/退缩维度(维度3)有1个项目评估效力中等外，此二维度其它各项目以及敏感多疑维度(维度1)、以我为尊维度(维度4)所有项目评估效力均较佳。结论：PDQC-3的A类人格障碍分量表可对中高特质水平的被试进行较好的评估，符合筛查问卷的要求；维度评估较分型评估的精准程度更高。

Objective:study the assessment power of the items in the Cluster A Personality Disorder ScreeningQuestionnaire based on CCMD-3 personality disorder diagnostic criteria(PDQC-3).Methods:The questionaire was administered to undergraduate students(n=1255),neurosis patients(anxiety disorder,n=192;Obsessive-compulsive disorder,n=224;phobia,n=279),depression disorder(n=164),schizophrenics(n=416).The data was analyzed by 2PL Logistic Modeland GRM based on IRT to conduct item function analysis.Results:In PPD(paranoid personality disorder),11 of 12 itemshad good assessment power,the other one was medium.All the items in SZPD(schoizoid personality disorder) had goodassessment power.Two items in indifferent dimension,one in loneliness/withdrawal dimension had medium assessmentpower.Others were good.Conclusion:Cluster A Personality Disorder Screening Questionnaire of PDQC-3 can provideaccurate assessment to the subjects with medium to high level of the traits,and dimensional assessment can provide moreinformation for the screening of personality disorder.

基金项目：

深圳市科技计划项目(200627)；深圳大学校级科研项目(4LN)

作者简介：

参考文献：

[1] Hambleton RK,Oakland T.Advances,issues,and researchin testing practices around the world.Applied Psychology:An International Review,2004,53(2):155-156;
[2] Knotts LS.Item response theory and person-fit analyses ofthe Revised NEO Personality Inventory conscientiousnessdomain.The Sciences and Engineering,1998,59(6):30-63;
[3] Thomas RC.Peer assessment of pathological personality:Anitem response theory analysis of rater and target characteristics.Dissertation Abstracts International:Section B:TheSciences and Engineering,2002,62(7):3416;
[4] Pere JF,Urbano L,Gabriel M.An item response theoryanalysis of response stability in personality measurement.Applied Psychological Measurement,2001,25(1):3-17;
[5] Pere JF.The measurement of neuroticism using MMQ,MPI,EPI and EPQ items:A psychome-tric analysis based onitem response theory.Personality and Individual Differ-ences,2001,30:641-656;
[6] Kate EW,Brent WR,Robert FK,Daniel MB,et al.Capturingabnormal personality with normal personality inventories:An item response theory approach.Journal of Personality,2008,76(6):1623-1650;
[7] Pere JF.The impact of social desirability bias on the EPQRitem scores:An item response theory analysis.Personalityand Individual Differences,2008,44:1784-1794;
[8] Douglas B,Simms LJ,Clark LA,Livesley WJ,et al.An itemresponse theory integration of normal and abnormal personalityscales.Personality Disorders:Theory,Research,andTreatment,2010,1(1):5-21;
[9] 曹亦薇.项目功能差异在跨文化人格问卷分析中的应用.心理学报,2003,35(1):120－126
[10] CCMD-3.中国精神障碍分类与诊断标准.第3 版,2001
[11] 卢宁,刘协和,李智明,张波,谢聪.CCMD-2-R 诊断标准的人格障碍检测工具的编制及其信度效度检验.中国心理卫生杂志,2001,15(2):133-136
[12] 王志英,卢宁,张海斌,周朝英.CCMD-3 人格障碍筛查问卷信、效度检验.中国临床心理学杂志,2010,18(6):711-713
[13] 王晶,卢宁.项目反应理论（IRT）在人格障碍测评工具C类分量表上的应用.中国临床心理学杂志,2010,18(5):575-578

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】