中国临床心理学杂志

世界卫生组织生存质量老年人量表简化版的研制

作者：林岳卿方积乾

分类号：B841.7

出版年,卷(期):页码：2011,19(1):27-30

摘要：

目的：研制WHOQOL-OLD量表的简化版，并考察该简表的信效度。在WHOQOL-OLD国际合作组提供的5566名老年人样本资料中，随机抽取2/3作为训练样本，1/3为考核样本。用经典测量理论和项目反应理论的方法对训练样本进行条目筛选，并用考核样本评价简表的信度和效度。结果：每个领域保留2个较优的条目，形成了12个条目的简明量表WHOQOL-OLD-12。简表各领域的平均信息量仅减少了22.1%～32.9%；简表的克朗巴赫系数为0.80；各领域与WHOQOL-BREF各领域及总分的相关系数介于0.21～0.76之间，大部分大于0.40。WHOQOL-OLD简明量表具有可接受的信度和效度，是老年人生存质量研究中简单易行的测量工具。

Objective:develop a short form of questionnaire WHOQOL-OLD,and evaluate its reliability and validity.Methods:From a sample of 5566 old adults provided by the research team of WHOQOL-OLD,2/3 of them were randomlyselected and used as a training sample,and the remaining 1/3 as a validation sample.The methods of classical testtheory and item response theory were used to select the better items in the training sample.And the validation sample wasused to evaluate the reliability and validity of the short form scale.Results:2 better items remained within each domain ofthe original WHOQOL-OLD scale,a short form WHOQOL-OLD-12 was formed.The average amount of t of the six domainsof short form scale was reduced from 22.1% to 32.9% only;the Cronbach’α of the short form was 0.8;and the correlationcoefficients between the domains of WHOQOL-OLD-12 and WHOQOL-BREF ranged from 0.21 to 0.76,most ofthem were greater than 0.4,which showed better criterion validity.Conclusion:With acceptable reliability and validity,WHOQOL-OLD-12 is a refined instrument for the quality of life of older adults.

基金项目：

作者简介：

参考文献：

[1] .United Nations.World population prospects:the 200
[2] .revision.New York:United Nations Population Division,2009.http://www.un.org/ esa/ population/ publications/wpp2008/pressrelease.pdf
[3] .Power M,Quinn K,Schmidt S,WHOQOL-OLD Group.Developmentof the WHOQOL-Old module.Quality of LifeResearch,2005,14(10):2197-2214
[4] .侯杰泰,温忠麟,成子娟.结构方程模型及其应用.第[5] .版.北京:教育科学出版社,2004.49
[5] .杨立峰,戴海崎.IRT 理论框架下不同参数模型和评分模型对能力估计的影响.菏泽学院学报,2007,29(2):15-18
[6] .Masters GN.A rasch model for partial credit scoring.Psychometrika,1982,47:149-174
[7] .Prieto L,Alonso J,Lamarca R.Classical test theory versusrasch analysis for quality of life questionnaire reduction.Health and Quality of Life Outcomes,2003,1(27):1-13
[8] .Lai JS,Cella D,Chang CH,et al.Item banking to improve,shorten and computerize self-reported fatigue:an illustrationof steps to create a core item bank from the FACITFatigueScale.Quality of Life Research,2003,12(5):485-501
[9] .Normand ST,Belanger AJ,Eisen SV.Graded response model-based item selection for behavior and symptom identification.Health Service Outcomes Research Methodology,2006,6:1-19
[10] .孔燕,张凡.基于条目反应理论的中国公民科学素质测评方法研究.科技管理研究,2009,4:280-283
[11] .Gomez R.Item response theory analyses of the parent andteacher ratings of the DSM-IV ADHD rating scale.AbnormalChild Psychology,2008,36(6):865-885
[12] .郝元涛,孙希凤,方积乾.量表条目筛选的统计学方法研究.中国卫生统计,2004,21(4):209-211
[13] .Fleck MP,Chachamovich E,Trentini C.Development andvalidation of the Portuguese version of the WHOQOL-OLDmodule.Revista de Saúde Pública,2006,40(5):785-791

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】