设为首页 | 加入收藏
网站首页 本刊简介 编委会 投稿指南 过刊浏览 广告合作 网上订购 下载专区 联系我们  
人格自评—他评一致性及关系质量的调节作用
作者:张登浩1  王登峰2 
单位:1. 中国人民大学心理学系  北京 100872 
2.
 北京大学心理学系  北京 100871 
关键词:人格 熟悉性 关系质量 中国人人格量表(QZPS) 
分类号:B841
出版年,卷(期):页码:2010,18(3):349-352
摘要:

目的:考查熟悉性和关系质量对中国人人格评价一致性的影响。方法:采用中国人人格量表对114名大学新生室友人格特质的自评—他评的一致性进行追踪研究。结果:尽管在QZPS的许多维度上第15周时的自评—他评一致性水平要高于第2周,但是这些变化在统计上却大都不显著:在第2周时,关系质量的主效应和调节效应在所有的人格维度上都不显著:在第15周时,在善良、人际关系维度上,关系质量的主效应显著,而且关系质量对于外向性和处世态度维度的自评—他评具有显著的调节作用。结论:许多西方文献所证实的熟悉性效应在中国文化下并没有出现,但关系质量的具有一定的调节作用。

Objective:To explore self-other agreement on personality and moderation effects of relationship quality.Methods:114 pairs of previously unacquainted freshmen roommates accomplished the Chinese Personality Scale(QZPS) at the second week and the 15th week subsequent to the initial introduction.Results:Although all self-other agreement coefficients were different for all personality trait scores in QZPS between the 2nd week and the 15th week,some coefficients increased from the 2nd week to the 15th week,others didn’t increased but decreased from the 2nd week to the 15th week,and all the increase was not statistically significant.At the second week,main effects and moderator effects of relationship quality was not significant for all personality traits.At the fifteenth week,main effects of relationship quality were significant for kindness and human relations,and moderator effects of relationship quality were significant for extraversion and ways of life.Conclusion:There is no acquaintanceship effect demonstrated by many western literatures in Chinese culture,but moderator effects of relationship quality are significant in some traits.

基金项目:
中国人民大学科学研究项目(08XNF009)资助
作者简介:
参考文献:

[1] Kurtz JE,Sherker JL.Relationship quality,trait similarity,and self-other agreement on personality ratings in college roommates.Journal of Personality,2003,71:21-48
[2] Funder DC.On seeing ourselves as others see us:Self-other agreement and discrepancy in personality ratings.Journal of Personality,1980,48:473-493
[3] Funder DC,West SG.Consensus,self-other agreement,and accuracy in personality judgment:An introduction.Journal of Personality,1993,61:457-496
[4] Letzring TD,Wells SM,Funder DC.Information quantity and quality affect the realistic accuracy of personality judg-ment.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2006,91(1):111-123
[5] Funder DC,Colvin CR.Friends and strangers:Acquaintan-ceship,agreement,and the accuracy of personality judg-ment.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1988,55:149-158
[6] Funder DC,Dobroth KM.Differences between traits; Prop-erties associated with interjudge agreement.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1987,52:409-418
[7] Watson D,Hubbard B,Wiese D.Self-other agreement in personality and affectivity:The role of acquaintanceship,trait visibility,and assumed similarity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2000,78:546-558
[8] Kammann R,Smith R,Martin C,McQueen M.Low accuracy in judgments of other' s psychological well-being as seen from a phenomenological perspective.Journal of Personality,1984,52:107-123
[9] Funder DC,Kolar DC,Blackman MC.Agreement among judges of personality:Interpersonal relations,similarity,and acquaintanceship.Journal of Personality and Social Psy-chology,1995,69:656-672
[10] Biesanz JC,West SG,Millevoi A.What do you learn about someone over time? The relationship between length of acq-uaintance and consensus and self-other agreement in judg-ments of personality.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2007,92:119-135
[11] Paulhus DL,Bruce MN.The effect of acquaintanceship on the validity of personality impressions:A longitudinal study.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1992,63:816-824
[12] Paulhus DL,Reynolds S.Enhancing target variance in personality impressions:Highlighting the person in person perception.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1995,69:1233-1242
[13] Watson D,Humrichouse J.Personality development in em-erging adulthood:Integrating evidence from self-ratings and spouse ratings.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2006,91:959-974
[14] McCrae RR,Stone SV,Fagan PJ,Costa PT.Identifying causes of disagreement between self-report and spouse ratings of personality.Journal of Personality,1998,66:285-313
[15] Wang DF,Cui H,Zhou F.Measuring the personality of Chinese:NEO PI-R versus QZPS.Asian Journal of Social Psychology,2005,8:97-122
[16] Steiger JH.Tests for comparing elements of a correlation Matrix.Psychological Bulletin,1980,87:245-251
[17] Nisbett RE.Perception and cognition:West-east differ ences.In:Jing QC,Rosenzweig MR,d' Ydewalle G,Zhang HC,et al.Proceedings of ICP 2004.London:Psychology Press,2006
[18] Ji L,Su Y,Nisbett RE.Culture,prediction,and change.Psychological Science,2000,12:450-456
[19] 王登峰,崔红.行为的跨情境一致性及人格与行为的关系:对人格内涵及其中西方差异的理论与实证分析.心理学报,2006,38(4):543-552

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【加入收藏
您是第访问者

《中国临床心理学杂志》编辑部
地址:湖南省长沙市中南大学湘雅二医院内, 410011
电 话:0731-85292472    电子邮件:cjcp_china@163.com
本系统由北京博渊星辰网络科技有限公司设计开发 技术支持电话:010-63361626