设为首页 | 加入收藏
网站首页 本刊简介 编委会 投稿指南 过刊浏览 广告合作 网上订购 下载专区 联系我们  
人际反应指数量表的信度和效度研究
作者:戎幸1  孙炳海1 2  黄小忠3  蔡旻颖1  李伟健2 
单位:1. 浙江师范大学心理研究所  浙江 金华 321004 
2.
 北京师范大学发展心理研究所  北京 100875 
3.
 浙江大学心理系 
关键词:人际反应指数 共情 信度 效度 
分类号:R395.1
出版年,卷(期):页码:2010,18(2):158-160
摘要:

目的:翻译并修订人际反应指数量表(IRI),考察其信度和效度。方法:对419名大学生和62名犯人进行调查。结果:验证性因素分析表明,C-IRI四因素结构拟合较好,各分量表的建构信度在0.59~0.75之间,重测信度在0.59~0.78之间。各分量表与效标量表的相关分析结果表明C-IRI具有良好的效标关联效度,犯人被试的C-IRI量表得分显著低于对照组中大学生被试的量表得分(t=-2.59,P<0.05)。结论:C-IRI具有良好的信度和效度,可以用于测量成人的共情水平。

Objective: To revise the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) and to examine its reliability and validity. Methods: Data were collected from a sample of 419 college students and 62 offenders and analyzed by reliability test and validity test. Results: The results of Confirmatory Factor Analysis showed that the revised IRI was four-factor construct and had good construct validities. The construct reliability of the subscales ranged from 0.59 ~0.75, and test -retest reliability of the subscales ranged from 0.59~0.78. Revised IRI also had good criterion-related validity and discrimination validity. The scores of offenders were significantly lower than those of the controlled group (t=-2.59, P<0.05). Conclusion: With acceptable psychometric quality, the Chinese version of Interpersonal Reactivity Index could be used to assess the empathy of Chinese college students.

基金项目:
教育部人文社科研究项目(09YJAXLX024);2009年浙江省教育科学规划课题(SCG2)的部分研究成果;浙江省高校优秀青年教师资助计划资助
作者简介:
参考文献:

[1] Davis. A multidimensional approach to individual differ-ences in empathy. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psy-chology,1980,10:85
[2] Dymond R. A scale for the measurement of empathic ability. Journal of Consulting Psychology,1949,13:127-133
[3] Kerr WA,Speroff BG. Validation and evaluation of the emp-athy test. Journal of General Psychology,1954,50:369-376
[4] 寇彧,徐华女.移情对亲社会行为决策的两种功能.心理学探新,2005,25(3):73-77
[5] Darrick J,David PF. Empathy and offending:A systematic review and meta-analysis. Aggression and Violent Be-havior,2004,9:441-476
[6] Coffman SL. Empathy as a relevant instructor variable in the experiential classroom. Group and Organization Studies,1981,6(1):114-120
[7] Olsen JK. Relationship between nurse-expressed empathy,patient-perceived empathy and patient stress. Image:J N Scholarship,1996,27:317-322
[8] 于鲁文.共情在心理咨询中的作用.健康心理学杂志,2003,11(4):272-278
[9] Hogan R. Development of an empathy scale. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,1969,33:307-316
[10] Mehrabian A,Epstein N. A measure of emotional empathy. Journal of Personality,1972,40:525-543
[11] Davis. Measuring individual differences in empathy:Evid-ence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1983,44(1):113-126
[12] 李同归,加藤和生.成人依恋的测量:亲密关系经历量表(ECR)中文版.心理学报,2006,38(3):399-406
[13] 汪向东,王希林,马弘.心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版).中国心理卫生杂志社,1999.244-246,246-248,318-320
[14] 黄芳铭.结构方程模式:理论与应用.中国税务出版社,2005.268-270
[15] 林嵩.结构方程模型原理及 AMOS 应用.华中师范大学出版社,2008.68
[16] Jerry T,Kok-Mun N,Richard EW. Model of effects of adult attachment on emotional empathy of counseling students. Journal of Counseling & Development Winter,2005,83:66-77
[17] Feshbach ND. Empathy in children:Some theoretical and empirical considerations. Counseling Psychologist,1975,5:25-30
[18] Burke DM. Empathy in sexually offending and nonoffending in adolescent males. Journal of Interpersonal Violence,2001,16:222-233

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【加入收藏
您是第访问者

《中国临床心理学杂志》编辑部
地址:湖南省长沙市中南大学湘雅二医院内, 410011
电 话:0731-85292472    电子邮件:cjcp_china@163.com
本系统由北京博渊星辰网络科技有限公司设计开发 技术支持电话:010-63361626