中国临床心理学杂志

时间压力和语音复杂性对口吃者语音编码的影响

作者：肖二平¹ 张积家² 陈穗清²

单位：1. 杭州师范大学心理学系浙江杭州 310036
2. 华南师范大学心理应用研究中心广东广州 510631

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2012,20(6):777-780

摘要：

目的:考察时间压力和语音复杂性对口吃者语音编码的影响。方法:采用外显发声任务,对口吃组与对照组在有、无时间压力条件下对不同语音复杂性材料的朗读速度和口吃频率进行了考察。结果:①口吃组和对照组在有时间压力条件下朗读速度显著快于无时间压力条件,朗读绕口令句子的速度显著慢于非绕口令句子,朗读声母绕口令显著慢于韵母绕口令;②在时间压力条件下口吃频率显著高于无时间压力条件,朗读绕口令句子的口吃频率显著高于非绕口令句子,朗读声母绕口令的口吃频率显著高于韵母绕口令;③朗读声母绕口令时在句首发生口吃的比率显著高于韵母绕口令。结论:时间压力和语音复杂性对口吃组和对照组的语言编码和言语流畅性有重要影响。

Objective: The present study intended to explore whether time pressure and phonological complexity would influence the phonological encoding of stutterers.Methods: Both persons who stutter(PWS) and persons who do not stutter(PNS) were investigated in overt speech task.Results: ①Both PWS and PNS read faster with time pressure than without time pressure,read twisters slower than non-twisters,and read Shengmu twisters slower than Yunmu twisters.②The stuttering frequency with time pressure was higher than that without time pressure,the stuttering frequency of reading twisters was higher than that of reading non-twisters,and the stuttering frequency of reading Shengmu twisters was higher than that of reading Yunmu twisters.③The ratio of stuttering at the beginning of sentence of reading Shengmu twisters was higher than that of reading Yunmu twisters.Conclusion: Time pressure and phonological complexity influenced both PWS and PNS in the language production system.

基金项目：

教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地项目(08JJOXLX269);全国教育科学“十一五”规划重点课题(DBA080164)

作者简介：

参考文献：

1.Starkweather CW. Fluency and stuttering[M].Engle-wood Cliffs,NJ:Prentice-Hall,1987.13.
2.Yaruss J,Scott. The role of performance in the demands and capacities model[J].Journal of Fluency Disorders,2000,(04):347-358.
3.Smith A,Kelly E. Stuttering:A dynamic,multi-factorial model[J].Nature and Treatment of Stuttering:New directions,1997,(04):204-217.
4.Levelt WJM,Roelofs A,Meyer AS. A theory of lexical access in speech production[J].Behavioral and Brain Sciences,1999.1-75.
5.Wheeldon L,Lahiri A. Prosodic units in speech production[J].Journal of Memory and Language,1997.356-381.
6.Wheeldon L. Generating prosodic structure[A].Hove:Psychology Press,2000.249-274.
7.Markus FD,Nicolas D. Time pressure and phonological advance planning in spoken production[J].Journal of Memory and Language,2007.195-209.
8.Alario FX,Costa A,Caramazza A. Frequency effects in noun phrase production:Implications for models of lexical access[J].Language and Cognitive Processes,2002.299-319.
9.Alario FX,Costa A,Caramazza A. Hedging one's bets too much? A reply to Levelt[J].Language and Cognitive Processes,2002.673-682.
10.Jordan MI. Motor learning and the degrees of freedom problem[A].Hillsdale,New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,1990.796-836.
11.Dell GS,Juliano C,Govindjee A. Structure and content in language production:A theory of frame constraints in phonological speech errors[J].Cognitive Science,1993.149-195.
12.Schnur TT,Costa A,Caramazza A. Planning at the phonological level during sentence production[J].Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,2006.189-213.
13.Ferreira F. Effects of length and syntactic complexity on initiation times for prepared utterances[J].Journal of Memory and Language,1991.210-233.
14.Ferreira F. Creation of prosody during sentence production[J].Psychological Review,1993.233-253.
15.Bosshardt HG. Subvocalization and reading rate differences between stuttering and non-stuttering children and adults[J].Journal of Speech and Hearing Research,1990.776-785.
16.Gainers ND,Runyan CM,Meyers SC. A comparison of young stutterers' fluent versus stuttered utterances on measures of length and complexity[J].Journal of Speech and Hearing Research,1991.37-42.
17.Ryan B. Articulation,language,rate and fluency characteristics of stuttering and non-stuttering preschool children[J].Journal of Speech and Heating Research,1992.333-342.
18.Logan K J,Conture EG. Length,grammatical complexity and rate differences in stuttered and fluent conversational utterances produced by children who stutter[J].Journal of Fluency Disorders,1995.35-62.
19.Logan KJ,Conture EG. Selected temporal,grammatical and phonological characteristics of conversational utterances produced by children who stutter[J].Journal of Speech and Hearing Research,1997.107-120.
20.宁宁,卢春明,彭聃龄,马振玲丁国盛. 口吃者的言语计划缺陷:来自词长效应的证据[J].心理学报,2007.215-224.
21.张积家,肖二平. 汉语口吃者在不出声言语中的语音编码[J].心理学报,2008.263-273.
22.Yaruss JS,Quesal RW. Overall assessment of the speaker's experience of stuttering(OASES):Documenting multiple outcomes in stuttering treatment[J].Journal of Fluency Disorders,2006.90-115.
23.吴超. 中国绕口令[M].上海:上海文艺出版社,2001.
24.张蕾. 口吃发生位置预测研究中的语言因素[J].中国特殊教育,2006.54-59.
25.Melnick KS,Conture EG,Ohde RN. Phonological priming in picture naming of young children who stutter[J].Journal of Speech Language Hear Research,2003,(02):1428-1448.
26.Chang SE,Ohde RN,Conture EG. Coarticulation and formant transition rate in young children who stutter[J].Journal of Speech Language Hear Research,2002,(04):676-688.
27.刘盈,石文惠,丁宝坤. 口吃患者MMPI与SAS、SDS的相关分析[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2001,(02):133-134.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-3611.2001.02.023.
28.刘盈,王玉,丁宝坤. 不同年龄口吃患者临床症状、人格特质及疗效研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2003,(02):144-145.

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】