中国临床心理学杂志

手机与纸笔测验的心理测量学等值性：以儿童版事件冲击量表为例

单位：1. 中国科学院心理研究所北京 100101
2. 北京邮电大学北京 100876
3. 诺基亚研究中心

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2010,18(1):31-33

摘要：

目的：以儿童版事件冲击量表为例考察手机测验和纸笔测验的心理测量学等值性。方法：在四川绵竹市某中学对334名初中学生施测手机版本和纸笔版本的儿童事件冲击量表(CRIES-13)，并考虑平衡顺序。应用经典测验理论和验证性因素分析取向对跨测验模式的等值性进行检验。结果：两种框架下的分析均得出量表具有较好的信度和结构效度，除个别条目外，在条目水平和量表水平上均存在很高的跨测验模式的等值性。结论：结果初步支持手机平台用于心理测验的测量学的可靠性以及与纸笔测验的等值性。

Objective:Mobile phone can be designed as a platform to administer test, Mobile -Phone Based Test (MPBT). To examine the reliability and validity of MPBT and equivalence with paper-and-pencil test (PPT) were the purposes of this study. Methods:Children’ s Revised Impact of Event Scale (CRIES) was edited into two forms:PPT and MPBT. 334 students of 8 eight classes in grade 7 and 8 in Mianzhu city Sichuan province participated this study. Both Classics Test Theory (CTT) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) were applied to examine the reliability, construct validity and equivalence between the two forms. Results:In CTT, item means, standard deviations, the Cronbach’ s α and inter-correlations among sub-scales according to the original three sub-scale construct were compared, and no significant difference was found. And both forms had acceptable internal consistency coefficients. In CFA, model comparison revealed strict measurement and structure equivalence between the two forms. Conclusion:Both CTT and CFA analysis supported the reliability and validity of MPBT and equivalence between PPT and MPBT in the case of CRIES.

基金项目：

中国科学院抗震救灾应急研究项目(O8CX112011);国家高技术研究发展计划重点项目(2008AA021204);国家自然科学基金(30840001)

作者简介：

参考文献：

[1] Song ZL,Foo M,Uy MA. Mood spillover and crossover among dual-earner couples:A cell phone event sampling study. Journal of Applied Psychology,2008,93:443-452
[2] Collins RL,Kashdan TB,Gollnisch G. The feasibility of using cellular phones to collect ecological momentary assessment data:Application to alcohol consumption. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology,2003,11:73-78
[3] Wajcman J. Life in the fast lane? Towards a sociology of technology and time. The British Journal of Sociology,2008,59:59-77
[4] Boschen MJ,Casey LM. The use of mobile telephones as adjuncts to cognitive behavioral psychotherapy. Professional Psychology:Research and Practice,2008,39:546-552
[5] Grassi A,Preziosa A,Villani D,et al. A relaxing journey:The use of mobile phones for well -being improvement. Annual Review of CyberTherapy and Telemedicine,2007,5:123-131
[6] Naglieri JA,Drasgow F,Schmit M,et al. Psychological test on the internet:New problem,old issues. American Psy chologist,2004,59:150-162
[7] 李育辉.不同类型量表的线上调查和传统纸笔测验的比较研究.博士学位论文.中国科学院心理研究所，2007
[8] 蔡华俭,林永佳,伍秋萍,等.网络测验和纸笔测验的测量不变性研究：以生活满意度为例.心理学报，2008，40：228-239
[9] Alsawalmeh YM,Feldt LS. A modification of Feldt’ s test of the equity of two dependent alpha coefficients. Psychometrika,1994,59:49-57
[10] Steiger JH. Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin,1980,87:245-251
[11] Vandenberg RJ,Lance CE. A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature:suggestions,practices,and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods,2000,3:4-70
[12] Ferrando PJ,Lorenzo-Seva U. IRT-related factor analytic procedures for testing the equivalence of paper-and-pencil and internet -administered questionnaires. Psychological Methods,2005,10:193-205

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】