中国临床心理学杂志

父亲在位问卷简式版的制定及在大学生中的信效度分析

作者：蒲少华¹ 卢彦杰¹ 吴平² 卢宁¹

单位：1. 深圳大学应用心理学研究与咨询中心广东深圳 518060
2. 安徽省歙县中学安徽歙县 245200

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2012,20(4):438-441

摘要：

目的:在父亲在位问卷中文修订版(Chinese revision of Father Presence Questionnaire,FPQ-R)的基础上建立父亲在位问卷中文简式版(Brief version of FPQ-R,FPQ-R-B)。方法:从FPQ-R抽取部分条目组成父亲在位问卷中文简式版,通过对705名大学生施测,检验其信效度。结果:①父亲在位问卷的中文简式版(FPQ-R-B)共31个条目,包含与父亲的关系、家庭代际关系、有关父亲的信念3个高阶维度,分为8个分量表。②简式版8因子和高阶3因子结构都较清晰,分别可解释总方差变异的70.72%和64.99%。FPQ-R-B各因子与FPQ-R完整版对应因子的相关均在0.81以上。3个高阶维度内各分量表的相关系数为0.32～0.51,3个高阶维度之间各分量表的相关系数为0.11～0.36。除高阶维度二的2个分量表外,其余6个分量表与PBI-F的关爱因子、鼓励自主因子及总量表呈显著正相关,相关系数为0.19～0.49;8个分量表与PBI-F的控制因子之间呈不相关到低负相关。③3个高阶维度和8个分量表的内部一致性Cronbachα系数都超过0.73。重测信度系数为0.59～0.80。结论:FPQ-R-B具有较好的信效度。

Objective: To set up the brief version of Chinese revision of Father Presence Questionnaire (FPQ-R-B) based on Chinese revision of Father Presence Questionnaire (FPQ-R)． Methods: A set of good items were extracted from FPQ-R to form the brief version. 705 Chinese college students were selected by means of convenient sampling and tested by FPQ-R. 414 of 705 students were measured by Parental Bonding Instrument(PBI-F) at the same time. 144 freshmen of 705 students were re-tested by FPQ-R after 4 weeks. Results: ①FPQ-R-B consisted of 31 items, including 3 higher-order domains, i. e. “relationship with the father”, “intergenerational family influences”, and “beliefs about the father”, and dividing into 8 scales. ②FPQ-R-B had clear factor structure. All items loaded above 0.40 on their intended factors. 8 factors explained 70.72% of the total variance, and 3 higher factors explained 64.99% of the total variance. Equivalence coefficients between FPQ-R-B and FPQ-R were above 0.81. The correlation coefficients of scales within their own higher- order domain were 0.32～0.51, and the correlation coefficients of scales across higher-order domain were 0.11～0.36.Except 2 scales in higher-order domain two, 6 scales in FPQ-R-B represented significantly positive correlation with care,encouraging autonomy and the total scores in PBI-F and their correlation coefficients were 0.19～0.49. 8 scales in FPQ-RB had no correlation to lower negative correlation with the control factor in PBI-F. ③All 3 higher-order domains and 8 scales produced Cronbach's α coefficient of 0.73 or higher. The test-retest reliability coefficients were 0.59～0.80. Conclusion:FPQ-R-B showed good reliability and validity and can be used on Chinese college students.

基金项目：

深圳大学科研基金资助面上项目(201124);全国教育科学“十一五”规划重点课题(DCA080145)

作者简介：

参考文献：

[1] 蒲少华,李臣,卢宁. 国外"父亲在位"理论研究新进展及启示[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2011,(02):141-147.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-260X.2011.02.027.
[2] Krampe EM. When is the father really there? A conceptual reformulation of father presence[J].Journal of Family Issues,2009.875-897.
[3] Krampe EM,Newton RR. The Father Presence Questionnaire:A confirmatory factor analysis of a new measure of the subjective experience of being fathered[J].Fathering,2006.159-190.
[4] 蒲少华,卢宁,唐辉. 父亲在位问卷的初步修订[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2012,(02):139-142.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2012.02.018.
[5] 杨红君,楚艳民,刘利. 父母教养方式量表(PBI)在中国大学生中的初步修订[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2009,(04):434-436.
[6] 王孟成,戴晓阳,姚树桥. 中国大五人格问卷的初步编制Ⅲ:简式版的制定及信效度检验[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2011,(04):454-457.
[7] 戴海崎,张锋,陈雪枫. 心理与教育测量[M].广州:暨南大学出版社,2006.92-95.
[8] 戴晓阳,曹亦薇. 心理评定量表的编制和修订中存在的一些问题[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2009,(05):562-565.

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】