中国临床心理学杂志

军人忠诚度研究进展

作者：王芙蓉杨芳

关键词：军人忠诚度研究进展

分类号：R395.6

出版年,卷(期):页码：2014,22(1):186-190

摘要：

忠诚是保证军队战斗力和凝聚力的重要基石。本文在国内外相关文献研究的基础上,系统梳理了军人忠诚度的内涵概念、结构维度、测量工具及相关变量等方面的研究成果。本文对军人忠诚度研究现状进行综合整理,对新形势下我军管理实践有一定的启示和参考价值。

Royalty of soldiers is regarded as the headstone of the combat effectiveness and cohesion of an army. On the basis of reviewing the research on the soldiers' royalty at home and abroad, the concept, structural dimensions, measurements, and related variables of soldiers' royalty have been sorted out systematically, revealing the shortness within the current research. The comprehensive review is enlightening and valuable for the military arrangement practice of PLA today.

基金项目：

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 Salo M. Commitment to the military service among finish conscripts. Course Library of the Finnish National Defence University, 2009
2 钱源源. 员工忠诚、角色外行为与团队创新绩效的作用机理研究：一个跨层次的分析. 浙江大学博士学位论文，2010
3 Gordon ME, Beauvais LL, Ladd RT. The job satisfaction and union commitment of unionized engineers. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 1984, 37(3): 359-37
4 Boroff KE, Lewin D. Voice and intent to exit a union firm: A conceptual and empirical analysis. Industrial and Labor Re-lations Review, 1997, 51: 50-62
5 Harvey MG, Novicevic MM. Inpatriate managers: how to in-crease the probability of success. Human Resource Manage-ment Review, 1999, 9: 51-82
6 Gal R. Commitment and obedience in the military: An israe-li case study. Armed Forces and Society, 1985, 11(4): 553-564
7 Henkisen Maanpuolustuksen Komitea. Henkisen maan-puolustuksen perustekijät, sen kokonaistavoitteet ja eri alo-jen tehtävät sekä johto-ja suorituselimet rauhan ja sodan ai-kana. Mietinnön I osa. Mikkeli: Länsi-Savon Kirjapaino, 1964
8 Eränen L, Harinen O, Jokitalo J. Sotilasyhteisön sosiaa-lipsykologiaa. Teoksessa M. Valtanen (toim.), Johtamisen so-siaalipsykologiaa-Käsitteitä ja käytäntöjä sotilasyhteisössä. Maanpuolustuskorkeakoulu. Johtamisen laitos, Julkaisusarja 2(19). Helsinki: Edita Prima Oy, 2008. 20-76
9 Kekäle P. MTS-tutkimukset 1990-1997. Maanpuolustustie-dotuksen suunnittelukunta, Tutkimusja seminaariselosteita n: o 8
10 高福霞，李婷，李志. 我国企业员工忠诚度研究述评. 经济师，2006. 1
11 Meyer JP, Allen NJ, Topolnytsky L. Commitment in a chang-ing world of work. Canadian Psychology, 1998, 39: 83-93
12 Meyer JP, Allen NJ. Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and application. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publi-cations, 1997
13 Tremble TR, Payne SC, Finch JF, Bullis RC. Opening orga-nizational archives to research: Analog measures of organiz-ational commitment. Military Psychology, 2003, 15: 167-190
14 O' Shea PG, Goodwin GF, Driskell JE, Salas E, Ardison S. The many faces of commitment: Facet-level links to perfor-mance in military contexts. Military Psychology, 2009, 21: 5-23
15 赵萌，苗丹民，孙云峰，等. 国外军人组织承诺研究进展. 第四军医大学学报，2007，28(8)：765-767
16 Meyer JP, Allen NJ. A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Manage-ment Review, 1991, 1(1): 61-89
17 Cohen A. Commitment before and after: A reconceptualiz-ation of organizational commitment. Human Resource Man-agement Review, 2007, 17: 336-354
18 Solinger ON, Olffen WV, Roe RA. Beyond the three-compo-nent model of organizational commitment. Journal of Appli-ed Psychology, 2008, 93(1): 70-83
19 Somers MJ. The combined influence of affective, continu-ance and normative commitment on employee withdraws. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2009, 74: 75-81
20 Karrasch AI. Antecedents and con sequences of organizat-ional commitment. Military Psychology, 2003, 15(3): 225-236
21 汤舒俊，汪超群. 现役士兵工作满意度与组织承诺的相关研究. 长江大学学报(社会科学版)，2007，30(6)：114-116
22 夏江沩，兰芬. 基层军官职业承诺现状分析. 军队政工理论研究，2013，13(2)：68-70
23 Powell DM, Meyer JP. Side-bet theory and the three-compo nent model of organizational commitment. Journal of Voca-tional Behavior, 2004, 65: 157-177
24 Gade PA. Organizational commitment in the military: An overview. Military Psychology, 2003, 15(3): 163-166
25 龙立荣，李霞. 中小学教师的职业承诺研究. 教育研究与实验，2002，18(4)：56-61
26 彭嘉熙，孔毅，苗丹民，等. 国防生职业满意度、职业承诺与焦虑的调查. 中国健康心理学杂志，2011，19(11)：1391-1393
27 王芙蓉，陈欢. 初级军官职业承诺问卷的编制. 中国临床心理学杂志，2013，21(1)：5-12
28 Irving PG, Coleman DF, Cooper CL. Further assessments of a three-component model of occupational commitment: Gen-eralizability and differences across occupations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1997, 82(3): 444-452
29 Salo M. Determinants of military adjustment and attrition during Finnish conscript service. Department of Teacher Ed-ucation. Tampere: University of Tampere. http://acta.uta.fi/ pdf/978-951-44-7470-5.pdf. 2008a
30 Bartone PT, Johnsen BH, Eid J, Brun W, Laberg JC. Factors influencing small-unit cohesion in Norwegian Navy officer cadets. Military Psychology, 2002, 14(1): 1-22
31 Van de Ven C, Van Gelooven R. Early attrition in the Neth-erlands'Armed Forces, a new monitor. http://www.interna-tionalmta.org/Documents/2006/2006036P.pdf. 2006
32 Heffner TS, Rentsch JR. Organizational commitment and so-cial interaction: A multiple constituencies approach. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2001, 59: 471-490
33 Tucker JS, Sinclair RR, Thomas JL. The multilevel effects of occupational stressors on soldiers' well-being, organization-al attachment, and readiness. Journal of Occupational Heal-th Psychology, 2005, 10(3): 276-299
34 Mathieu JE. A cross-level nonrecursive model of the ante-cedents of organizational commitment and satisfaction. Jour-nal of Applied Psychology, 1991, 76(5): 607-618
35 Fisher CD, Shaw JB, Woodman RW, Mobley WH. Final re-port on transition socialization effectiveness, years one and two. TR-ONR-11. College Station, TX: Texas A&M Univer-sity, 1983
36 Wesbrook SD. The potential for military disintegration. In Sarkesian SC. Combat effectiveness: Cohesion, stress, and the volunteer military. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publica-tions, 1980
37 Britt TW. Human dimensions baseline assessment of the 75th Ranger Regiment. Department of Operational Stress Research. Washington, DC: Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, 1999
38 Sinkko R. Katsaus suomalaisten maanpuolustustahtoon ja-sen tilaan 2000-luvun ensimmäisellä vuosikymmenellä-empiirisiä tutkimustuloksia. Johtamisen ja sotilaspedago-giikan laitos, Julkaisusarja 3(2). Helsinki: Edita Prima Oy, 2009
39 Ingraham LH, Manning FJ. Cohesion: Who needs it, what is itb? Military Review, 1981, 61(6): 2-12
40 Payne SC, Huffman AH. A longitudinal examination of the influence of mentoring on organizational commitment and turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 2005, 48(1):158-168
41 Vandenberghe C, Bentein K, Stinglhamber F. Affective com-mitment to the organization, supervisor, and work group: An-tecedents and outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2004, 64: 47-71
42 Nissinen V. A critical constructivist approach to conceptual-izing, modeling and measuring military leadership in the finnish defence forces. Dissertation. Publication Series 1 (20). Helsinki: Oy Edita Ab
43 Nissinen V. Development of leadership behavior in the finn-ish defence forces. National Defence College. Publication Series 1(18). Helsinki: Oy Edita Ab
44 Gade PA, Tiggle RB, Schumm WR. The measurement and consequences of military organizational commitment in sol-diers and spouses. Military Psychology, 2003, 15(3): 191-207
45 Sinkko R, Harinen O, Leimu H. Suomalaisten varusmiesten maanpuolustustahto ja siihen yhteydessä olevat tekijät vuon-na 2005 tehdyn kyselyn ja varusmieshaastattelujen valossa. Maanpuolustuskorkeakoulu. Käyttäytymistieteiden laitos, Julkaisusarja 1(2). Helsinki: Edita Prima Oy. 2008
46 Lähdesmäki M. Varusmiehen läheiset ihmissuhteet ja niiden merkityksellisyys ja sopeutuminen armeijaelämään. Puolus-tusvoimien Koulutuksen Kehittämiskeskus, Tutkimusselost-eita C-S1-1/1993. Helsinki, 1993
47 Sinclair RR, Tucker JS, Cullen JC, Wright C. Performance differences among four organizational commitment profiles. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2005, 90(6):1280-1287
48 王芙蓉. 初级军官职业承诺特点及影响因素. 中国临床心理学杂志，2013，21(4)：144-147
49 Henderson WD. Cohesion: The human element in combat. Leadership and societal influence in the armies of Soviet Union, the United States, North Vietnam, and Israel. Wash-ington, DC: National Defense University Press, 1985
50 Zaccaro SJ. The effects of cohesion source on process loss in group performance. The University of Connecticut. Ann Ar-bor, MI: ProQuest Company, 1981
51 Mullen B, Copper C. The relation between group cohesive-ness and performance: Integration. Psychological Bulletin, 1994, 115(2): 210-227
52 Riketta M. The causal relation between job attitudes and performance: A meta-analysis of panel studies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2008, 93(2): 472-481
53 Harris RN, White MA, Eshwar NC, Mottern JA. Stress and attrition from military training: First-term sailors in the U.S. Navy. Navy Personnel Research, Studies, and Technology, 2005
54 Mathieu JE, Zajac DM. A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 1990, 108(2): 171-194

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】