中国临床心理学杂志

无聊倾向量表(BPS):中文版的结构、信度及效度

单位：1. 哈尔滨师范大学教育科学学院心理学系哈尔滨师范大学学校心理教育研究基地哈尔滨 150025
2. 呼伦贝尔学院教育科学学院呼伦贝尔 021008

关键词：无聊倾向效度信度

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2014,22(1):74-77

摘要：

目的:在大学生群体中引入无聊倾向量表(Boredom Proneness Scale,BPS),探讨该量表在中国文化背景下的因素结构,并检验其信效度。方法:采用BPS中文版调查了1230名大学生,收回有效问卷1129份。另用特质孤独量表、特质焦虑量表、自评抑郁量表和自评无聊倾向条目在90名大学生中检验效标关联效度。3周后随机抽取64名大学生进行重测。结果:BPS中文版包括内部刺激和外部刺激2个维度,低卷入、高卷入、高刺激需求、低刺激需求和缺乏耐性5个分量表,共20个条目;验证性因素分析显示数据拟合良好(χ²/df=1.60,CFI=0.91,TLI=0.89,RMSEA=0.04,SRMR=0.06);5个分量表的内部一致性信度在0.57~0.81之间,重测信度在0.69~0.83之间;BPS中文版具有较好的效标关联效度。结论:BPS中文版具有良好的信度和效度,可以用于大学生的无聊倾向测量。

Objective: To introduce and investigate the psychometric attributes of the Chinese version of Boredom Proneness Scale(BPS). Methods: 1230 university students were asked to complete the Chinese version of BPS, in which 90 students were further asked to complete Trait Loneliness Scale, Trait Anxiety Inventory, Self-Rating Depression Scale, and a self-assessment boredom item. 64 students were followed to complete the Chinese version of BPS three weeks after the first investigation. Results: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses yielded two reliable dimensions in the questionnaire: external stimulation and internal stimulation, which contained five factors: low engagement, high engagement, high stimulating requirements, low stimulating requirements and lack of patience, with Cronbach'a of these subscales ranged 0.57 from 0.81; the test-retest reliabilities ranged 0.69 from 0.83. The BPS was of good criterion validity as well. Conclusion: The Chinese version of BPS can be used as an effective instrument to assess the boredom status in Chinese university students.

基金项目：

2012年黑龙江省研究生创新科研项目(YJSCX2012-163HLJ)

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 Van Tilburg WAP, Igou ER. On boredom: Lack of challenge and meaning as distinct boredom experiences. Motivation and Emotion, 2012, 36(2): 181-194
2 Sommers J, Vodanovich SJ. Boredom proneness: Its relation-ship to psychological-and physical-health symptoms. Jour-nal of Clinical Psychology, 2000, 56(1): 149-155
3 Jarvis S, Seifert T. Work avoidance as a manifestation of hos-tility, helplessness, and boredom. Alberta Journal of Educa-tional Research, 2002, 48(2): 174-187
4 Farmer R, Sundberg ND. Boredom proneness: The develop-ment and correlates of a new scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1986, 50(1): 4-17
5 刘勇，陈健芷，姜梦，等. 多维状态无聊量表中文版在中国大学生中的应用. 中国临床心理学杂志，2013，21(4)：558-561
6 黄时华，李冬玲，张卫，等. 大学生无聊倾向问卷的初步编制. 心理发展与教育，2010，26(3)：308-314
7 Ahmed SMS. Psychometric properties of the boredom prone-ness scale. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1990, 71(3): 963-966
8 Vodanovich SJ, Kass SJ. A factor analytic study of the bore-dom proneness scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1990, 55(1-2): 115-123
9 Gana K, Akremi M. French adaptation and validation of the boredom proneness scale(BP). Anne Psychologique, 1998, 98: 429-450
10 Gordon A, Wilkinson R, McGown A, Jovanoska S. The psy-chometric properties of the boredom proneness scale: An ex-amination of its validity. Psychological Studies, 1997, 42: 85-97
11 Vodanovich SJ, Wallace JC, Kass SJ. A confirmatory appr-oach to the factor structure of the boredom proneness scale: Evidence for a two-factor short form. Journal of Personality Assessment, 2005, 85(3): 295-303
12 刘平. 状态与特质性孤独量表. 增刊. 中国心理卫生杂志，1999. 289
13 李文利，钱铭怡. 状态特质焦虑量表中国大学生常模修订. 北京大学学报：自然科学版，1995，31(1)：108-114
14 刘贤臣，戴郑生，唐茂芹，等. 抑郁自评量表 (SDS) 医学生测查结果的因子分析. 中国临床心理学杂志，1994，2(3)：151-154
15 韦嘉，张进辅，王亚琨. 中学生迷信信念的维度探索及量表编制. 中国临床心理学杂志，2012，20(1)：11-14

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】