中国临床心理学杂志

解释偏向矫正对大学生演讲焦虑的影响

作者：李丹枫余真真段添翼陈昕昱杨智辉

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2014,22(1):43-47

摘要：

目的:探讨解释偏向矫正对演讲焦虑个体的干预效果。方法:以77名演讲焦虑的大学生为被试,实验组和安慰剂组的被试接受四次、为期两周的解释偏向矫正干预。结果:两周干预后实验组演讲焦虑症状的改善程度显著高于安慰组和控制组,实验组在演讲者信心自评量表的生理行为、情绪情感和语言思维三个维度上均有显著改善,安慰剂组仅在演讲者信心自评量表的生理行为和情绪情感两个维度上出现显著差异,控制组没有显著变化;在生理指标上,实验组的脉搏变化在干预前后存在显著差异,安慰剂组不存在显著差异;实验组和安慰剂组的血压变化在干预前后均不显著。结论:解释偏向矫正的方法对缓解演讲焦虑有一定的效果。

Objective: To reveal the intervention effects of interpretation bias modification(IBM) on public speaking anxiety. Methods: 77 students with high public speech anxiety were enrolled and assigned into the experimental group and the placebo group both received four times of IBM therapy in two weeks. Results: Experimental group's Speech anxiety symptoms improved better than the placebo group and control group after intervention. The experimental group showed significant improvements on physiological behavior, emotions and feelings, and Language of thinking, but the placebo group only showed significant improvements on physiological behavior as well as emotions and feelings. The control group had no change. On physiological indicators, experimental group, but not the placebo group had significant differences on pulse variation after intervention. The experimental group and the placebo group showed no significant differences on blood pressure's changes after intervention. Conclusion: IBM intervention can release the public speaking anxiety.

基金项目：

中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(RW2013-25)

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 Brydon SR，Scott MD. Between one and many：The art and science of public speaking. Mountain View, CA：Mayfield Publishing Co, 2006
2 杨丽. 认知行为团体疗法对大学生公众演讲焦虑的干预研究. 华中师范大学，2008
3 王井云. 自尊，惧怕否定评价对公众演讲焦虑的影响. 中国健康心理学杂志，2011，19(9)：1115-1117
4 黄光扬. 大学生演讲焦虑及影响因素的研究. 中国心理卫生杂志，1996，10(2)：68
5 金双军. 大学生英语演讲焦虑及原因探析. 医学教育探索，2009，8(11)：1432-1435
6 Mathews A, MacLeod C. Induced processing biases have causal effects on anxiety. Cognition and Emotion, 2002, 16 (3): 331-354
7 Grey S, Mathews A. Effects of training on interpretation of emotional ambiguity. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 2000, 53(4): 1143-1162
8 Holmes EA, Mathews A, Dalgleish T, et al. Positive interpre-tation training: Effects of mental imagery versus verbal train-ing on positive mood. Behavior Therapy, 2006, 37(3): 237-247
9 Mathews A, Mackintosh B. Induced emotional interpretation bias and anxiety. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 2000, 109 (4): 602
10 纳塔利· H· 罗杰斯. 会演讲的人成功机会多两倍. 海口：南海出版公司，2007
11 Beard C, Amir N. Negative interpretation bias mediates the effect of social anxiety on state anxiety. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 2010, 34(3): 292-296
12 Beard C, Weisberg RB, Amir N. Combined cognitive bias modification treatment for social anxiety disorder: A pilot tri-al. Depression and Anxiety, 2011, 28(11): 981-988
13 Salemink E, van den Hout M, Kindt M. Generalisation of modified interpretive bias across tasks and domains. Cogni-tion and Emotion, 2010, 24(3): 453-464
14 汪向东. 心理卫生评定量表手册（复印版）. 北京：中国心理卫生杂志社，1999
15 Constans JI, Penn DL, Ihen GH, et al. Interpretive biases for ambiguous stimuli in social anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1999, 37(7): 643-651
16 Wilson JK, Rapee RM. The interpretation of negative social events in social phobia: Changes during treatment and rela-tionship to outcome. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 2005, 43(3): 373-389
17 许书萍. 高社交焦虑大学生的解释偏向. 上海：华东师范大学，2010
18 高隽，杨鹏，钱铭怡，等. 大学生演讲比赛选手的演讲状态焦虑研究. 中国临床心理学杂志，2009，17(1)：42-45

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】