设为首页 | 加入收藏
网站首页 本刊简介 编委会 投稿指南 过刊浏览 广告合作 网上订购 下载专区 联系我们  
道德厌恶启动后身体清洁词加工的时间特征:来自ERPs的证据
作者:燕良轼1  颜志雄1  丁道群1  邹霞2  范伟1 
单位:1. 湖南师范大学教育科学学院心理系  长沙 410081 
2.
 广西幼儿师范高等专科学校  南宁 530000 
关键词:身体清洁 道德纯洁 ERPs N400 LPC 
分类号:R395.1
出版年,卷(期):页码:2014,22(1):32-37
摘要:

目的:采用事件相关电位技术(ERPs)和语义启动范式,探讨语义启动道德厌恶后对身体清洁词加工的时间特征及其神经机制。方法:采用双字词启动范式,先呈现启动词(道德厌恶词VS非道德厌恶词),然后再呈现目标词(清洁词VS非清洁词),被试对目标词的字形结构作判断。通过启动词与目标词在脑电指标上有无差异来探讨其加工特征。结果:四类刺激在N1、N400成分上没有出现加工差异;在LPC成分上,启动词与目标词交互作用显著,当目标词为清洁词时,道德厌恶词启动条件下比非道德厌恶启动词条件下在左脑前、前中、中脑前部诱发了更大的LPC。结论:道德厌恶启动后个体表现出更强烈的身体清洁倾向,以缓解和释放厌恶感,保持良好的自我道德意象。

Objective: To investigate the complex relationship between physical cleaning and moral purity and the psychological meaning of physical cleaning after moral disgust priming. Methods: Event-related brain potentials were recorded when participants performed character pattern judgment task(up-down/right-left). stimuli words were consisted of four types, 2 types of priming words(the moral-disgust adjective VS non moral-disgust adjective) and 2 types of target words(physical cleaning verbs VS neutral verbs) The ERPs were compared among physical-moral disgust, physical-non-moral disgust, non-physical-moral disgust and non-physical-non-moral disgust words conditions recorded from target stimuli. Results: ERP waveforms showed that N400 amplitude and latency was not significant, but LPC amplitude at 800-1000ms showed significant two-way interactions of priming words × target words. Post hoc analyses confirmed that the LPC amplitude was enlarged to physical cleaning words compared to neutral words in moral disgust. Conclusion: The processing of physical cleaning words and moral disgust words are closely associated at implicit level, suggesting that the moral disgust would induce individual to do physical cleansing for alleviating disgust and maintaining a good moral self image.

基金项目:
国家社会科学基金(11BSH046);教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目(13YJA190017);湖南师范大学青年优秀人才培养计划项目(2012YX04);湖南省研究生创新基金项目(CX2012B193)
作者简介:
参考文献:

1 Brewer EC, Evans IH. Brewer' s dictionary of phrase and fa-ble: Cassell, 1981
2 王伟勒依. 洗礼――面向基督的皈依. 世界宗教文化, 2002. 51-52
3 思高圣经学会. 新约全书:思高圣经学会出版社, 1969
4 陈茜, 王懿之, 杨世光. 泼水节的起源, 传播及其意义. 贝叶文化论, 1990
5 阎书昌. 身体洁净与道德. 心理科学进展, 2011, 19:1242-1248
6 Zhong CB, Liljenquist K. Washing away your sins: Threat-ened morality and physical cleansing. Science, 2006, 313: 1451-1452
7 Zhong CB, Strejcek B, Sivanathan N. A clean self can render harsh moral judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psy-chology, 2010, 46: 859-862
8 Liljenquist K, Zhong CB, Galinsky AD. The smell of virtue: Clean scents promote reciprocity and charity. Psychol Sci, 2010, 21: 381-383
9 Holland RW, Hendriks M, Aarts H. Smells like clean spirit: Nonconscious effects of scent on cognition and behavior. Psychological Science, 2005, 16: 689-693
10 Williams LE, Huang JY, Bargh JA. The scaffolded mind: Higher mental processes are grounded in early experience of the physical world. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2009, 39:1257-1267
11 Yan Z. To wash your body, or purify your soul: Physical cle-ansing would strengthen the sense of high moral character. Psychology, 2011, 2: 992-997
12 Yang Q, Wu X, Zhou X, et al. Diverging effects of clean ver-sus dirty money on attitudes, values, and interpersonal be-havior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2013, 104: 473-489
13 Zhong CB, Leonardelli GJ. Cold and lonely: does social ex-clusion literally feel cold? Psychol Sci, 2008, 19: 838-842
14 冉俐雯, 刘翔平, 周雅, 等. 咀嚼口香糖对考试焦虑的缓解作用(英文). 中国临床心理学杂志, 2010, 18(6):731-734
15 Schnall S, Benton J, Harvey S. With a clean conscience cleanliness reduces the severity of moral judgments. Psy-chological Science, 2008, 19: 1219-1222
16 Lee SWS, Schwarz N. Dirty hands and dirty mouths: Embod-iment of the moral-purity metaphor is specific to the motor modality involved in moral transgression. Psychological Sci-ence, 2010, 21: 1423-1425
17 Sherman GD, Clore GL. The color of sin white and black are perceptual symbols of moral purity and pollution. Psycholog-ical Science, 2009, 20: 1019-1025
18 Moll J, Zahn R, de Oliveira-Souza R, et al. The neural basis of human moral cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2005, 6: 799-809
19 Wheatley T, Haidt J. Hypnotic disgust makes moral judg-ments more severe. Psychological science: A journal of the American Psychological Society/APS, 2005, 16: 780-784
20 Schnall S, Haidt J, Clore GL, et al. Disgust as embodied mo-ral judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2008, 34: 1096-1109.
21 Chapman HA, Anderson AK. Things rank and gross in na-ture: A review and synthesis of moral disgust. Psychological Bulletin, 2013, 139: 300-327
22 郑信军, 何佳娉. 诱发道德情绪对大学生人际信任的影响. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2011, 19(4):508-511
23 王还, 刘杰, 常宝儒. 现代汉语频率词典. 北京:北京语言学院出版社, 1986
24 Haidt J. The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 2007, 316: 998-1001
25 Noguera C, Ortells JJ, Abad MJF, et al. Semantic priming ef-fects from single words in a lexical decision task. Acta Psy-chologica, 2007, 125: 175-202
26 Huber DE. Immediate priming and cognitive aftereffects. Journal of experimental psychology. General, 2008, 137: 324-347
27 Kutas M, Hillyard SA. Brain Potentials During Reading Re-flect Word Expectancy and Semantic Association, 1984
28 Juottonen K, Revonsuo A, Lang H. Dissimilar age influences on two ERP waveforms(LPC and N400) reflecting semantic context effect. Cognitive Brain Research, 1996, 4: 99-107
29 Ojima Y, Kanayama N, Ohira H. The cognitive process in moral judgment: An ERP study. Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society, 2011,18: 314-319
30 高培霞, 刘惠军, 丁妮, 等. 青少年对情绪性图片加工的脑电反应特征. 心理学报, 2010, 42:342-351
31 Ito TA, Larsen JT, Smith NK, et al.Negative information we-ighs more heavily on the brain: The negativity bias in eval-uative categorizations. Journal of Personality and Social Psy-chology, 1998, 75: 887-900
32 袁加锦, 李红. 人类对情绪事件效价强度的易感性及神经机制. 心理科学进展, 2012, 20:10-18
33 Herbert C, Junghofer M, Kissler J. Event related potentials to emotional adjectives during reading. Psychophysiology, 2007. 45
34 Baetens K, Cruyssen LVd, Achtziger A, et al. N400 and LPP in spontaneous trait inferences. Brain Research, 2011, 1418: 83-92
35 姚树桥, 朱雪玲, 王孟成. 临床心理学领域积极功能评估研究进展. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2011, 19(1):52-54

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【加入收藏
您是第访问者

《中国临床心理学杂志》编辑部
地址:湖南省长沙市中南大学湘雅二医院内, 410011
电 话:0731-85292472    电子邮件:cjcp_china@163.com
本系统由北京博渊星辰网络科技有限公司设计开发 技术支持电话:010-63361626