设为首页 | 加入收藏
网站首页 本刊简介 编委会 投稿指南 过刊浏览 广告合作 网上订购 下载专区 联系我们  
思维压抑和接受对焦虑内疚情绪及个人责任归因的效果比较
作者:Marcus A.Rodriguez1 2  高隽1 2  钱铭怡1  肖征3 
单位:1. 北京大学心理学系  北京 100871 
2.
 复旦大学  上海 200433 
3.
 北京金日恒达国际石油技术发展有限公司  北京 100029 
关键词:思维压抑 想法行为混淆 强迫思维 责任 焦虑 
分类号:R395.2
出版年,卷(期):页码:2012,20(3):356-359
摘要:

目的: 考察想法行为混淆(Thought Action Fusion,TAF)和思维压抑在强迫观念形成中的交互作用。方法: 采用方便取样在115名大学生中考察实验诱发的TAF闯入是否会导致压抑后的负性情绪和个人责任信念的增高,以及思维压抑的作用是否会随靶想法对个人重要意义的变化而有所改变。结果: ①句子填空范式引发了显著高于基线水平的焦虑和内疚情绪;但和预期的结果不同的是,在完成5分钟的思维压抑任务后,被试的负性情绪有所下降。②思维压抑被发现是一种无法达到预期目标的应对认知策略,会增加对个人有重要意义的闯入性想法的负性责任信念。结论: 本研究支持了强迫观念的认知模型在中国大学生人群中的跨文化的有效性。

Objective: To examine the interactive effect of thought action fusion and thought suppression in the formation of obsessions. Methods: To investigate, among a convenience sample of 115 college students, whether experimentally induced TAF intrusions would lead to an escalation of negative affect and beliefs of personal responsibility, and to examine whether the effects of thought suppression would vary as a function of the personal significance of the target thought. Results:The sentence paradigm(Rachman et al., 1996) elicited a significant increase in anxiety and guilt relative to baseline levels; however, contrary to expectations, participants' negative affect decreased following a 5 minute suppression task.Results revealed that suppression of personally significant target thoughts led to an increase in attributions of responsibility,thus revealing a paradoxical effect of thought suppression. Conclusion: The present research provides support for the cross-cultural validity of the cognitive model of obsessions among a Chinese college student sample.

基金项目:
作者简介:
参考文献:

[1] Julien D,O'Connor KP,Aardema F. Intrusive thoughts,obsessions,and appraisals in obsessive-compulsive disorder:A critical review[J].Clinical Psychology Review,2007.366-383.
[2] Rachman S,Shafran R,Mitchell D. How to remain neutral:An experimental analysis of neutralization[J].Behaviour Research and Therapy,1996.889-898.
[3] Wegner DM. Ironic processes of mental control[J].Psychological Review,1994.34-52.
[4] Salkovskis PM,Richards HC,Forrester E. The relationship between obsessional problems and intrusive thoughts[J].Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy,1995,(03):281-299.
[5] Rachman S. A cognitive theory of obsessions:Elaborations[J].Behaviour Research and Therapy,1998.385-401.
[6] Salkovskis PM. Obsessional compulsive problems:A cognitive-behavioural analysis[J].Behaviour Research and Therapy,1985.571-583.
[7] Rassin E. The contribution of thought-action fusion and thought suppression in the development of obsession-like intrusions in normal participants[J].Behaviour Research and Therapy,2001.1023-1032.
[8] van den Hout M,Kindt M,Weiland T. Instructed neutralization,spontaneous neutralization and prevented neutralization after an obsession-like thought[J].Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry,2002.177-189.
[9] Zucker BG,Craske MG,Barrios V. Thought action fusion:Can it be corrected[J].Behaviour Research and Therapy,2002.653-664.
[10] Abramowitz JS,Tolin DF,Street GP. Paradoxical effects of thought suppression:A meta-analysis of controlled studies[J].Clinical Psychology Review,2001.683-703.
[11] Purdon C,Clark DA. Suppression of obsession-like thoughts in nonclinical individuals:Impact on thought frequency,appraisal and mood state[J].Behaviour Research and Therapy,2001.1163-1181.
[12] Corcoran KM,Woody SR. Effects of suppression and appraisals on thought frequency and distress[J].Behaviour Research and Therapy,2009.1024-1031.
[13] Rodriguez MA,钱铭怡,高隽. 想法行为混淆量表在中国大学生中的修订[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2010,(1):859-863.doi:10.1016/j.pain.2009.11.013.
[14] 钟杰,秦漠,蔡文菁. Padua 量表在中国大学生人群中的修订[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2006,(01):1-4.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-3611.2006.01.001.
[15] Rodriguez MA,贾珂,钱铭怡. 思维压抑量表:中文版的结构、信度及效度[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2011,(02).doi:10.1093/her/cyp023.

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【加入收藏
您是第访问者

《中国临床心理学杂志》编辑部
地址:湖南省长沙市中南大学湘雅二医院内, 410011
电 话:0731-85292472    电子邮件:cjcp_china@163.com
本系统由北京博渊星辰网络科技有限公司设计开发 技术支持电话:010-63361626