中国临床心理学杂志

艾森克个性问卷(成人版)计算机自适应测验的信效度研究

作者：雷辉¹ 2 戴晓阳² 朱熊兆¹

单位：1. 中南大学湘雅二医院医学心理研究所湖南长沙 410011
2. 深圳大学师范学院心理学系广东深圳 518060

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2012,20(3):325-327

摘要：

目的: 检验艾森克个性问卷(成人版)计算机自适应测验(EPQ-A-CAT)在实际应用中的测量精准度、效度和测试效率。方法: 选取204名大学生被试完成了EPQ-A-CAT的测试,其中120名被试接受了CAT和纸笔两种版式的施测,并对31名被试进行了CAT版式的重测。结果: CAT版式的估计标准误均值在四个分量表中都小于终止规则预设的最小误差值;CAT重测的相关系数分别为0.79(E)、0.85(N)、0.67(P)、0.71(L);CAT版式总体能够节省一半以上的项目,各分量表节省了70%-30%的项目;两个版本测试结果的积差相关系数在E、N、P、L四个分量表中分别为0.85、0.81、0.75和0.74。结论: 研究结果证明了EPQ-A-CAT版式是高效、可靠和有效的测量工具。

Objective: A Computerized Adaptive Test of Eysenck Personality Questionnaire(Adult) （EPQ-A-CAT） was administrated under real testing condition to evaluate and validate measurement accuracy, validity, and efficiency. Methods:The EPQ-A-CAT was administered in a sample of 204 college students, of which 120 subjects received the two versions CAT and paper-and-pencil test and 30 subjects received the CAT test-retest. Results: The mean of estimated standard error of CAT under four subscales were all less than the prespecified minimum error values; and the correlations of test-retest were 0.79 (E), 0.85 (N), 0.67 (P), 0.71 (L) respectively; item savings were above a half of the total scale, and ranged from 70% to 30% for the four subscales; the Pearson correlation coefficients of the two versions scores were 0.85,0.81, 0.75, and 0.74 for the E, N, P, and L subscales. Conclusion: The EPQ-A-CAT proved to be an efficient, reliable and valid measurement tool.

基金项目：

作者简介：

参考文献：

[1] Weiss DJ. Adaptive testing by computer[J].Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,1985.774-789.
[2] Waller NG,Reise SP. Computerized adaptive personality assessment:An illustration with the absorption scale[J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1989.1071-1058.
[3] Roper BL,Ben-Porath YS,Butcher JN. Comparability and validity of CAT with the MMPI-2[J].Journal of Personality Assessment,1995,(02):358-371.
[4] Forbey JD,Handel RW,Ben-Porath YS. A real data simulation of computerized adaptive administration of the MMPI-A[J].Computers in Human Behavior,2000.83-96.
[5] Reise SP,Henson JM. Computerization and adaptive administration of the NEO PI-R[J].Assessment,2000,(04):347-364.
[6] Fliege H,Becker J. Development of a computer-adaptive test for depression(D-CAT)[J].Quality of Life Research,2005.2277-2291.
[7] Fliege H,Becker J. Evaluation of a computer-adaptive test for the assessment of depression[J].INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF METHODS IN PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH,2009,(01):23-36.
[8] Becker J,Fliege H. Functioning and validity of a computerized adaptive test to measure anxiety(A-CAT)[J].DePression and Anxiety,2008.E182-E194.
[9] 龚耀先. 艾森克个性问卷在我国的修订[J].心理科学,1984.11-18.
[10] 陈仲庚. 艾森克人格问卷的项目分析[J].心理学报,1983.211-217.
[11] 朱昌明,刘协和. 艾森克个性问卷(成人)成都地区试用报告[J].四川医学院学报,1983,(02):155-159.
[12] 钱铭怡,武国城. 艾森克人格问卷简式量表中国版(EPQ-RSC)的修订[J].心理学报,2000,(03):317-323.
[13] 雷辉,戴晓阳. 计算机自适应测验方式在艾森克人格问卷中的应用[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2011,(03):306-308.
[14] 戴晓阳,曹亦薇. 心理评定量表的编制和修订中存在的一些问题[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2009,(05):562-565.
[15] Ferrando PJ. The accuracy of the E,N and P trait estimates:an empirical study using the EPQ-R[J].Personality and Individual Differences,2003.665-679.

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】