中国临床心理学杂志

不同人格类型对情绪信息注意偏向的影响

作者：杜巍¹ 2 高红丽¹ 闫春平¹ 杨世昌¹

单位：1. 新乡医学院心理学系河南新乡 453003
2. 大庆师范学院教育科学学院教育心理教学部黑龙江大庆 163712

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2012,20(3):309-311

摘要：

目的: 探析不同人格类型群体在情绪信息加工过程中的特点。方法: 采用线索-靶子范式,分析注意偏向机制中的干扰抑制、返回抑制两个方面;采用艾森克人格量表(EPQ-A),从某全日制大学本科二年级学生758人中,按EPQ中神经质和内外向两个维度的标准分高、低各12.5%选出四种典型人格类型各15名为研究对象,探析四组被试的注意偏向特征。结果: 当靶子和线索出现的时间差为1000ms时,四组被试对三类情绪图片均存在返回抑制效应;图片性质主效应显著(F=1.30,P<0.05)、四组人格类型之间差异不显著(F=0.65,P>0.05)。负性图片与正性图片的返回抑制效应差异显著(F=1.71,P<0.05),反应时方差分析结果显示组别与图片性质交互作用显著(F=1.62,P<0.05)。外倾人格特质组对正性图片产生了注意警觉,四组被试对正性、负性刺激都存在注意解除困难。结论: 正常人群对情绪性刺激具有选择性加工趋势,外倾个体更偏好加工正性刺激,内向不稳定组对负性刺激更为敏感。

Objective: To study the features of typical personality traits in cognitive processing. Methods: According to the interference surpression, inhibition of return and the consciousness from the mechanism of attentional bias, using Clues-Target Model to expore the characteristics of attention bias about typical personality traits in normal population. 758 undergrateduate sophomores were estimated by Eysenck Personality Questionaire of Adults (EPQ-A). Depending on neuroticism and extra-introversion of EPQ, divided the subjects into four groups, incluing outward stability(n=15), outward instability(n=15), inward stablility(n=15) and inward instablility(n=15). Results: In the Clues-Target Task, when time difference is 1000ms, for three types of emotional pictures, all subjects have the effects of inhibition of return; there were significant difference in the main effects of image properties(F=1.30, P<0.05); no significant difference in different personality traits (F=0.65, P>0.05). Statistically remarkable was found between negative pictures and positive pictures of inhibition effects(F=1.71, P<0.05). The group which have extraversion personality trait produced attention alert on positive pictures.For positive and negative stimulus, all subjects were present the difficulty about the relieve of attention.

基金项目：

河南省教育厅资助项目(2010-QN-119);新乡医学院重点学科开放课题资助项目(ZD200972)

作者简介：

参考文献：

[1] 杨小冬,罗跃嘉. 注意受情绪信息的实验范式[J].心理科学进展,2004.833-841.
[2] 龚耀先. 修订艾森克个性问卷手册[M].湖南:地图出版社,1992.11-12.
[3] 白露,马慧,黄宇霞. 中国情绪图片系统的编制[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2005,(11):719-722.doi:10.3321/j.issn:1000-6729.2005.11.001.
[4] 黄宇霞,罗跃嘉. 负性情绪刺激是否总是优先得到加工:ERP研究[J].心理学报,2009,(09):822-831.doi:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2009.00822.
[5] Joormann J,Gotlib IH. Selective attention to emotional faces following recovery from depression[J].Abnorm Psychology,2007,(01):80-85.
[6] 高红丽,杨世昌,闫春平. 儿童期受虐对成人情绪面孔注意偏向的影响[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2011,(02):154-156.
[7] Gouzoulis-Mayfrank E,Arnold S,Heekeren K. Deficient inhibition of return in schizophrenia-further evidence from an independent sample[J].Progress in Neuro-Psychopharma-cologicum and Biological Psychiatry,2006.42-49.
[8] 乐洪波,马树华,程晓玲. 重度抑郁症对负性情绪面孔的注意偏向[J].中国心理卫生生杂志,2009,(11):795-799.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2009.11.009.
[9] Mogg K,Bradley BP,Miles. Time course ofattentional bias for threat scenes:Testing the vigilance-avoidance hypothesis[J].Cognition and Emotion,2004.689-700.
[10] 刘兴华,钱铭怡,周晓林. 高焦虑个体对威胁性词语的注意偏向及习惯化[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2007.769-772.
[11] Amin Z,Constable RT,Canli TH. Attentional bias for valenced stimuli as a function of personality in the dot-probe task[J].Journal of Research in Personality,2004,(01):15-23.
[12] 王国锋,彭小虎. 内外向人格特质的关联性负变电位研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2011,(06):753-755.

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】