|
摘要：
|
|
目的:在大学生群体中对思维压抑量表(White Bear Suppression Inventory,WBSI)进行修订并考察其信效度。方法:采用方便取样方法,对样本一的125名大学生施测WBSI及贝克抑郁问卷,以检验该量表的效度,并随机选取其中33名学生,在初测4周后进行了重测;对样本二的383名大学生施测WBSI、宾州忧虑问卷、事件影响量表-修订版及想法行为混淆量表。对样本三的334名大学生施测WBSI、帕多瓦量表、特质焦虑问卷及多元个人传统性量表-宿命迷信分量表。结果:对样本一的探索性因素分析获得WBSI的3个因素(闯入性思维、思维压抑和转移注意),3个因素可解释总变异的52.4%;对样本二和样本三的验证性因素分析显示,三因素模型拟合最好(χ2/df=3.45,CFI=0.91,TLI=0.89,RMSEA=0.07,SRMR=0.06)。WBSI总分的内部一致性系数为0.87,重测信度为0.59;3个因素的内部一致性系数分别为0.83、0.66和0.70。女性WBSI得分均显著高于男性。效标效度分析表明WBSI与抑郁(r=0.29)、特质焦虑(r=0.42)、创伤后应激障碍症状(r=0.42)、强迫症状(r=0.30)及广泛性焦虑症状(r=0.44)呈显著正相关。本研究还探索了迷信在OCD症状的发展维持中的作用,结果支持迷信导致了思维压抑从而导致了OCD症状(χ2/df=5.04,CFI=0.88,TLI=0.82,RMSEA=0.11,SRMR=0.08)。结论:思维压抑量表的中文修订版具有良好的信效度。
|
|
Objective: To test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of White Bear Suppression Inventory(WBSI) among a Chinese student sample. Methods: A convenience sample of 125 college students completed the WBSIand Beck Depression Inventory; a randomly selected subsample of 33 students participated in the retest in 4 weeks. A second sample of 383 college students completed the WBSI, Penn State Worry Questionnaire, Impact of Event Scale-Revised,and Thought-Action Fusion Scale. A third sample of 334 college students completed the WBSI, State-Trait Anxiety In-ventory, Padua Inventory, and a measure of Chinese superstition. Results: EFA results revealed 3 factors (intrusivethoughts, thought suppression and self-distraction), which accounted for 52.4% of the total variance. CFA results providedsupport for a 3-factor model ( χ2/df=3.45, CFI=0.91, TLI=0.89, RMSEA=0.07, SRMR=0.06). Internal consistency and test-retest coefficients for the WBSI-total were 0.87 and 0.59 respectively. WBSI-total scores were significantly higher for fe-male participants. Criterion-related validity results revealed positive significant correlations between WBSI and depression(r=0.29), trait-anxiety (r=0.42), PTSD symptomology (r=0.42), OCD (0.30), and GAD (r=0.44). SEM results also providedsupport for a model wherein thought suppression mediates the relationship between superstition and obsessive-compulsivesymptoms. Conclusion: The Chinese version of the WBSI is found to have good reliability and validity.
|
|
基金项目：
|
|
|
|
作者简介：
|
|
|
|
参考文献：
|
|
1 Wegner DM,Zanakos S. Chronic thought suppression[J].Journal of Personality,1994.615-640.
2 Muris P,Merckelbach H,Horselenberg R. Individual differences in thought suppression[J].Behaviour Research and Therapy,1996.501-513.
3 Altin M,Gencoz T. Psychopathological correlates and psychometric properties of the white bear suppression inventory in a turkish sample[J].European Journal of Psychological Assessment,2009,(01):23-29.
4 Smari J,Rafnsson FD. Chronic thought suppression and obsessionality:The relationships between the white bear suppression inventory and two inventories of obsessive-compulsive symptoms[J].Personality and Individual Differences,2001.159-165.
5 Rodriguez MG,Delgado PA,Rovella AT. Structural validity and reliability of the Spanish version of the white bear suppression inventory (WBSI) in a sample of the general Spanish population[J].The Spanish Journal of Psychology,2008.650-659.
6 Lucuano JV,Belloch A,Algarabel S. Confirmatory factor analysis of the white bear suppression inventory and the thought control questionnaire[J].European Journal of Psychological Assessment,2006,(04):250-258.
7 Rassin E. The white bear suppression inventory (WBSI) focuses on failing suppression attempts[J].European Journal of Personality,2003.285-298.
8 Blumberg SJ. The white bear suppression inventory:Reviaiting its factor structure[J].Personality and Individual Differences,2000.943-950.
9 Rodriguez MA,钱铭怡,高隽. 想法行为混淆量表在中国大学生中的修订[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2010,(1):859-863.doi:10.1016/j.pain.2009.11.013.
10 郑晓华,舒良,张艾琳. 状态-特质焦虑问卷在长春的测试报告[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1993,(02):60-62.
11 刘平. Beck抑郁问卷(BDI)[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1999,(增刊):194-196.
12 钟杰,秦漠,蔡文菁. Padua量表在中国大学生人群中的修订[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2006,(01):1-4.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-3611.2006.01.001.
13 Zhong J,Wang C,Li J. Penn state worry questionnaire:Structure and psychometric properties of the Chinese version[J].Journal of Zhejiang University-Science B,2009,(03):1673-1581.
14 Behar E,Alcaine O,Zuellig AR. Screening for generalized anxiety disorder using the Penn state worry questionnaire:A receiver operating characteristic analysis[J].Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry,2003,(01):25-43.
15 郭素然,辛自强,耿柳娜. 事件影响量表修订版的信度和效度分析[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2007,(01):12-18.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-3611.2007.01.006.
16 杨国枢,余安邦,叶明华. 中国人的个人传统性与现代性:概念与测量[A].台北:桂冠图书股份有限公司,1993.241-306.
17 Pettit JW,Temple SR,Norton PJ. Thought suppression and suicidal ideation:Preliminary evidence in support of a robust association[J].DePression and Anxiety,2009.758-763.
18 Wegner DM. Ironic processes of mental control[J].Psychological Review,1994.34-52.
19 Shipherd JC,Beck JG. The role of thought suppression in posttraumatic stress disorder[J].Behavior Therapy,2005.277-287.
20 Einstein DA,Menzies RG. The role of magical thinking in obsessive compulsive symptoms in an undergraduate sample[J].DePression and Anxiety,2004.174-179.
|
|
服务与反馈：
|
|
【文章下载】【加入收藏】
|
|
|
|