中国临床心理学杂志

述情障碍者情绪启动效应的ERPs特征

单位：1. 中南大学湘雅二医院医学心理研究所湖南长沙410011
2. 华南师范大学心理应用研究中心广东广州510631
3. 湖南农业大学科学技术师范学院湖南长沙410128

分类号：R749.9

出版年,卷(期):页码：2012,20(1):25-28

摘要：

目的:分析述情障碍者情绪启动中的ERPs特征,探讨述情障碍者情绪自动加工缺陷的神经机制。方法:采用TAS-20中文版筛选出述情障碍者与非述情障碍者进入情绪启动实验。以阈下或阈上方式呈现启动图片,要求受试对目标图片做出正负性的判断,记录受试ERPs数据。结果:在阈上启动任务中,述情障碍组的P2波幅和"启动-非启动"差异波N600波幅均显著小于非述情障碍组的波幅,而阈下启动任务中的P2、P3潜伏期与波幅及N600波幅则均不存在显著组间差异。结论:本研究进一步支持述情障碍者对无意识感知的情绪刺激的自动加工是完整的,而对意识到的情绪刺激的自动加工存在明显的缺陷。

Objective: To compare the differences of event-related potentials (ERPs) elicited by the target pictures during subliminal or supraliminal affective priming task between alexithymic and nonalexithymic, and explore neurophysiological mechanism of the deficit of automatic emotion processing in alexithymia. Methods: The Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) was applied twice with a three months interval, alexithymic and nonalexithymic were selected to finish affective priming tasks. Prime pictures were presented subliminally or supraliminally, and subjects were required to judge whether the target picture was positive or negative, while the ERPs were recorded. Results: In supraliminal priming tasks, the alexithymic was characterized by the decreased P2 peak amplitude and N600 (difference wave, primed minus unprimed) peak amplitude, while in subliminal affective priming tasks, there were no significant differences of peak latencies and amplitudes between alexithymic and nonalexithymic. Conclusion: This study provides further ERPs evidences to support that alexthymic has deficit in automatic processing for emotional information that is aware of, while has no deficit in automatic processing for emotional information that is not aware of.

基金项目：

高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金新教师基金(200805331003);国家自然科学基金(81000590)

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 Sifneos PE. The prevalence of alexithymic characteristics in psychosomatic patients. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics,1973, 22:255-262
2 Mantani T, Okamoto Y, Shirao N, Okada G, Yamawaki S. Reduced activation of posterior cingulate cortex during imagery in subjects with high degrees of alexithymia: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Biological Psychiatry,2005, 57: 982-990
3 Luminet O, Vermeulen N, Demaret C, Taylor GJ, Bagby RM.Alexithymia and levels of processing: Evidence for an overall deficit in remembering emotion words. Journal of Research in Psychiatry, 2006, 40(5): 713-733
4 Troisi A, Delle Chiaie R, Russo F, Russo MA, et al. Nonverbal behavior and alexithymic traits in normal subjects:Individual differences in encoding emotions. Jouranal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 1996, 184: 561-566
5 Berthoz S, Artiges E, Van de Moortele P, et al. Effect of impaired recognition and expression of emotions on frontocingulate cortices: An fMRI study of men with alexithymia. Am Journal Psychiatry, 2002, 159: 961-967
6 Klauer KC, Musch J. Affective priming: findings and theories.In Musch J, Klauer K. The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion. Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbanm, 2003. 7-49
7 蚁金瑶，罗英姿，钟明天，凌宇，姚树桥. 述情障碍者的情绪启动效应特征. 中国心理卫生杂志，2007，5：302-306
8 蚁金瑶，姚树桥，朱熊兆. TAS-20 中文版的信度、效度分析. 中国心理卫生杂志，2003，11：763－767
9 Taylor GJ, Bagby RM, Ryan DP, Parker JDA. Validation of the alexithymia construct: A measurement-based approach. Can J Psychiatry, 1990, 35: 290-297
10 Lang PL, Bradley MM, Cuthbert BN. International affective picture system(IAPS): Instruction manual and affective ratings.Technical report A-6. Gainesvile, FL: NIMH Center for the study of Emotion and Attention, University of Florida,2005
11 Suslow T, Junghanns K, Donges US, Arolt V. Alexithymia and automatic processing of verbal and facial affect stimuli.Cah Psycho Cogn, 2001, 20: 297-324
12 Mueller J, Alpers GW, Reim N. Dissociation of rated emotional valence and stroop interference in observer -rated alexithymia. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 2006, 61:261-269
13 Lundh LG, Simonsson-Sarnecki M. Alexithymia and cognitive bias for emotional information. Personality and Individual Deifference, 2002, 32: 1063-1075

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】