设为首页 | 加入收藏
网站首页 本刊简介 编委会 投稿指南 过刊浏览 广告合作 网上订购 下载专区 联系我们  
暴力历史、临床、风险评估量表中文版信效度研究
作者:吕颖1 2  韩臣柏2  王小平1 
单位:1. 中南大学湘雅二医院精神卫生研究所  长沙 410011 
2.
 南京医科大学附属脑科医院司法精神科  南京 210029 
关键词:信度|效度|评估|暴力|精神疾病|暴力历史临床风险评估量表 
分类号:R395.1
出版年,卷(期):页码:2013,21(6):984-987
摘要:

目的:对暴力历史、临床、风险评估量表中文版(HCR-CV)进行信效度研究。方法:HCR-CV信效度研究的受试者由156例男性住院精神分裂症患者组成,2周后接受重测。评定者一致性由两名精神科医生评价了12例精神分裂症患者。最后HCR-CV包含19个条目,其Cronbach'sα系数为0.584~0.775;评定者一致性系数为0.820~0.965;总量表及各分量表重测信度为0.523~0.953;条目与分量表的相关系数为0.264~0.836;对二周暴力的预测效度AUC为0.600~0.732,其中总量表分AUC为0.721,截断值为21,敏感性为60.00%,特异性为77.30%,分类正确率为75.64%;历史分量表分AUC为0.732,截断值为10分,敏感性为53.33%,特异性为90.07%,分类正确率为86.54%。校标效度:与MOAS及PCL-R总分及因子分相关具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:HCR-CV修订后在男性住院精神分裂症患者的危险性评估中仍有良好的信度与效度,具有较好的适用性。

Objective:To examine the reliability and validity of the Chinese Version of the Historic Clinical Risk management(HCR-CV) in Chinese inpatients with schizophrenia.Methods:The psychometric study included 156 schizophrenic inpatients recruited from Nanjing Brain Hospital, all subjects participated in the retest reliability assessment after 2weeks. Twelve schizophrenic inpatients participated in the inter-ratter reliability assessed by two psychiatrists.Results:The Cronbach's α coefficients of the HCR-CV ranged from 0.584~0.746; inter-rater consistency coefficients ranged from0.820~0.965; the test-retest reliability coefficients ranged from 0.523~0.953; the correlation coefficient between item and factor ranged from 0.264~0.836; AUC of total scores and subscale scores ranged from 0.600~0.732, the AUC of total scores of HCR-CV was 0.721, cut-off was 21, and sensitivity and specificity were 60.00%, 77.30% respectively, correctly classification was 75.64%. AUC of historic subscale score was 0.732, cut-off was 10, and sensitivity and specificity were53.33%, 90.07% respectively, correctly classification was 86.54%. Criterion-related validity: The total score and subscale scores of HCR-CV were related with scores of MOAS and PCL-R significantly.Conclusion:The HCR-CV is an efficient and valid instrument for violence risk assessment in Chinese inpatients with schizophrenia.

基金项目:
上海市法医学重点试验室开放课题资助“精神障碍者暴力危险性评估-20量表的信效度研究”(编号:KF0908);12.5国家科技支撑计划“精神病人暴力危险性评估模型研究”(编号:2012BAK16B04-3);南京医科大学发展基金项目(编号:09 NJMUM126)
作者简介:
参考文献:

1 李毅,高北陵,胡峰,等. 辨认和控制能力精神医学评定量表的初步编制. 中国临床心理学杂志,2011,19(1):48-54
2 Bonta J, Law M, Hanson K. The prediction of criminal andviolent recidivism among mentally disordered offenders: Ameta-analysis. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 1998, 123:123-142
3 郑瞻培. 司法精神医学基础. 上海:上海科技出版社,1997
4 Webster CD, Douglas KS, Eaves D, et al. HCR-20: Assess-ing risk of violence(version 2). Vancouver: Mental HealthLaw and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser, 1997
5 Foley SR, Kelly BD, Clarke M, et al. Incidence and clinicalcorrelates of aggression and violence at presentation in pati-ents with first episode psychosis. Schizophrenia Research,2005, 72(2): 161-168
6 Hare R D. The Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised(2ndedition). Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems, 2003
7 Gacono CB. The clinical and forensic assessment of psycho-pathy: A practitioner' s guide. New York: Lawrence ErlbaumAssociates Publishers, 2000
8 Kay SR, Wolkenfeld F, Murill LM. Profiles of aggressionamong psychiatric patients: I. Nature and prevalence. Jour-nal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 1988, 176(9): 539-546
9 Oliver PC, Crawford MJ, Rao B, et al. Modified Overt Aggr-ession Scale(MOAS) for people with intellectual disabilityand aggressive challenging behaviour: a reliability study.Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities,2007, 20(4): 368-372
10 谢斌,郑瞻培. 修订版外显攻击行为量表(MOAS). 特刊.中国行为医学科学,2001,10:195-196
11 Krakowski MI, Czobor P, Citrome L, et al. Atypical antip-sychotic agents in the treatment of violent patients withschizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. Archives of Gen-eral Psychiatry, 2006, 63(6): 622-629
12 Douglas KS, Ogloff JR, Hart SD. Evaluation of a model ofviolence risk assessment among forensic psychiatric pati-ents. Psychiatric Services, 2003, 54(10): 1372-1379
13 解亚宁. 心理统计学. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2007. 302-305
14 Hare RD, Clark D, Grann M, et al. Psychopathy and the pr-edictive validity of the PCL-R: An international perspective.Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 2000, 18(5): 623-645

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【加入收藏
您是第访问者

《中国临床心理学杂志》编辑部
地址:湖南省长沙市中南大学湘雅二医院内, 410011
电 话:0731-85292472    电子邮件:cjcp_china@163.com
本系统由北京博渊星辰网络科技有限公司设计开发 技术支持电话:010-63361626