设为首页 | 加入收藏
网站首页 本刊简介 编委会 投稿指南 过刊浏览 广告合作 网上订购 下载专区 联系我们  
组织策略对学前儿童和大学生协作抑制的影响
作者:唐卫海1  张环2 3  冯虹1  刘希平1 
单位:1. 天津师范大学教育科学学院  天津 300387 
2.
 天津师范大学心理与行为研究院  天津 300074 
3.
 中国科学院心理研究所  北京 100101 
关键词:协作抑制|组织策略|提取策略破坏 
分类号:R395.1
出版年,卷(期):页码:2013,21(6):871-878
摘要:

目的:采用经典的协作抑制研究范式,通过控制小组内部组织策略的相同与否,比较分析4岁、5岁学前儿童和大学生在协作提取任务中的表现及差异。方法:实验1从天津市某幼儿园选取160名4岁和160名5岁学前儿童,采用2×2×2的三因素被试间设计,分别考察4岁、5岁儿童在有无组织策略指导的条件下,小组在协作提取任务上的表现。实验2从天津某大学选取160名本科生,采用2×2的被试间设计,考察在相同和不同组织策略条件下,其协作提取任务的表现。结果:在4岁儿童组,无论是否有指导,儿童在协作提取过程中均出现协作抑制,而在5岁儿童组,当儿童以给定的相同的组织策略进行编码后,协作抑制现象消失;大学生被试在相同组织策略的条件下,协作组的组织策略破坏程度大,协作抑制出现;而在不同组织策略条件下,协作组的组织策略破坏程度小,协作抑制消失。结论:提取策略破坏机制不能完全解释不同年龄被试的协作抑制现象,大学生的协作抑制由提取策略破坏导致,而学前儿童在不存在提取策略破坏的条件下仍出现协作抑制。提取策略破坏不是协作抑制的唯一解释。

Objective:By controlling the organization strategies, we recorded the recall performance among preschool children and college students respectively to examine retrieval strategy disruption hypothesis of collaborative inhibition.Methods:In Experiment 1, we recorded the recall performance with and without the guide of organizational strategy in the preschool children. Experiment 2 recorded the recall performance with the guide of the same or different organizational strategies in college students.Results:The results of Experiment 1 showed that the 5-year-old children had no collabora tive inhibition under the guide of organizational strategy, and that 4-year-old children had collaborative inhibition in both conditions with or without the guide. Experiment 2 showed that, under the guide of the same organization strategy, college students had collaborative inhibition, and that the collaborative inhibition disappeared under the different strategies guide.Further, the disruption of organizational strategy of the college students was worse in the former condition than the latter.Conclusion:The article indicates that the development of organizational strategies in preschool children is in line with stage hypothesis, and that the mechanism of collaborative process in preschool children and college students are different.

基金项目:
教育部人文社科研究基金(11YJA190015);第41批留学回国人员科研启动基金;天津市十二五教育科学规划重点课题(CE2016);全国教育科学规划教育部重点课题(GOA107011)项目资助
作者简介:
参考文献:

1 Weldon MS, Bellinger KD. Collective memory: Collabora-tive and individual processes in remembering. Journal of Ex-perimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,1997, 23(5): 1160-1175
2 刘希平,张环,唐卫海,冯虹. 协作抑制的认知机制. 心理科学进展,2013,21(5):792-799
3 Blumen HM, Rajaram S. Influence of re-exposure and ret-rieval disruption during group collaboration on later individ-ual recall. Memory, 2008, 16(3): 231-244
4 Finlay F, Hitch GJ, Meudell PR. Mutual inhibition in collab-orative recall: Evidence for a retrieval-based account. Jour-nal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Co-gnition, 2000, 26(6): 1556-1567
5 Yaron-Antar A, Nachson I. Collaborative remembering ofemotional events: The case of Rabin' s assassination. Memo-ry, 2006, 14: 46-56
6 Barber SJ, Rajaram S. Collaborative memory and part-set -cueing impairments: The role of executive depletion in mod-ulating retrieval disruption. Memory, 2011, 19(4): 378-397
7 Barber SJ, Rajaram S. Exploring the relationship betweenretrieval disruption from collaboration and recall. Memory,2011, 19(5): 462-469
8 Wright DB, Klumpp A. Collaborative inhibition is due to theproduct, not the process, of recalling in groups. PsychonomicBulletin and Review, 2004, 11(6): 1080-1083
9 Ross M, Blatz CW, Schryer E. Social memory processes. InRoediger HL. Learning and memory -A comprehensive ref-erence, Volume 2: Cognitive psychology of learning. NewYork, NY: Elsevier, 2008. 911-926
10 Basden BH, Basden DR, Henry S. Costs and benefits of col-laborative remembering. Applied Cognitive Psychology,2000, 14(6): 497-507
11 Basden BH, Basden DR, Bryner S, Thomas RL. A comparis-Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology Vol.21 No.6 2013on of group and individual remembering: Does collaborat-ion disrupt retrieval strategies? Journal of Experimental Psy-chology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1997, 23(5):1176-1191
12 Blumen HM, Rajaram S. Effects of repeated collaborative re-trieval on individual memory vary as a function of recall ver-sus recognition tasks. Memory, 2009, 17(8): 840-846
13 Congleton AR, Rajaram S. The influence of learning meth-ods on collaboration: Prior repeated retrieval enhances re-trieval organization, abolishes collaborative inhibition, andpromotes post-collaborative memory. Journal of Experimen-tal Psychology, 2011, 140(4): 535-551
14 Örjan Dahlström, Danielsson H, Emilsson M, Andersson Jdoes retrieval strategy disruption cause general and specificcollaborative inhibition? Memory, 2011, 19(2): 140-154
15 Freuen MT. Different encoding strategies affect retrieval ofinformation in collaborative groups. Unpublished Master' sthesis, Montana State University, 2008
16 Pereira-Pasarin LP, Rajaram S. Study repetition and dividedattention: Effects of encoding manipulations on collaborativeinhibition in group recall. Memory and Cognition, 2011, 39:968-976
17 Miller PA. Individual differences in children' s strategic be-haviors: Utilization deficiencies. Learning and IndividualDifferences, 1994, 6: 285-307
18 左梦兰,刘晓红. 4-7岁儿童记忆策略发展的实验研究.心理科学,1992,2:8-13
19 桑标,缪小春,邓赐平,Van Lieshout E,Monks FL. 超常与普通儿童元记忆知识发展的实验研究. 心理科学,2002,25(4):406-409
20 Cornoldi C, Gobbo C, Mazzoni G. On metamemory-memoryrelationship: strategy availability and training. InternationalJournal of Behavioral Development, 1991, 14(1):101-121
21 Patrick JL, Zoë Oldham. Do children need to learn to collaborate? The effect of age and age difference on collaborativerecall. Cognitive Development, 2004, 13:1-35
22 Weldon MS, Blair C, Huebsch D. Group remembering: Doessocial loafing underlie collaborative inhibition? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,2000, 26(6): 1568-1577
23 Roenker DL, Thompson CP, Brown SC. Comparison of mea-sures for the estimation of clustering in free recall. Psycho-logical Bulletin, 1971, 76: 45-48
24 庞红. 儿童有关组织策略知识和记忆监控的发展以及它们与记忆行为的关系. 心理科学,1991,6:23-27
25 李洪玉,尹红新. 儿童元认知发展的研究综述. 心理与行为研究,2004,2(1):383-387
26 李晶,刘希平. 材料熟悉度和任务类型对幼儿心理理论发展的影响. 心理科学,2008,31(5):1086-1089
27 李晶,刘希平. 3-5岁儿童信念状态推理中的偏差. 心理与行为研究,2009,7(1):61-66
28 王异芳,苏彦捷,何曲枝. 3-5岁儿童基于声音线索的情绪知觉. 心理学报,2012,44(11):1472-1478

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【加入收藏
您是第访问者

《中国临床心理学杂志》编辑部
地址:湖南省长沙市中南大学湘雅二医院内, 410011
电 话:0731-85292472    电子邮件:cjcp_china@163.com
本系统由北京博渊星辰网络科技有限公司设计开发 技术支持电话:010-63361626