中国临床心理学杂志

中国大五人格问卷简式版在乳腺癌患者中的应用

单位：1. 中南大学湘雅二医院医学心理学研究所长沙 410011
2. 中南大学湘雅医院乳腺科长沙 410008

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2013,21(5):783-785

摘要：

目的：检验中国大五人格问卷简式版(CBF-PI-B)在乳腺癌群体中的信、效度。方法：529名女性乳腺癌患者和141名正常女性完成了中国大五人格问卷简式版(CBF-PI-B),贝克焦虑量表(BAI)和流调中心用抑郁量表(CESD)。结果：全量表的Cronbach'sα系数为0.80,5个分量表的Cronbach'sα系数在0.89~0.95之间;全量表的重测信度为0.57,5个分量表的重测信度在0.67~0.82之间;全量表条目间平均相关系数为0.11,5个分量表条目间平均相关系数在0.50~0.69之间。验证性因素分析各拟合指标:χ²/df(5.777),RMSEA(0.095),CFI(0.924),NFI(0.910),TLI(0.905),拟合结果达到可接受水平;量表具有较好的效标关联效度。乳腺癌患者的神经质水平、宜人性水平显著高于正常女性群体,开放性水平显著低于正常女性群体。结论：CBF-PI-B在乳腺癌群体中应用时的信、效度达到了测量学要求,关注乳腺癌患者的神经质水平具有十分重要的意义。

Objective: To assess the reliability and validity of Chinese Big Five Personality Inventory Brief Version in Chinese female patients with breast cancer. Methods: The CBF-PI-B and a parcel of scales were administrated to 529patients and 141 healthy women. The reliability and validity of CBF-PI-B were analyzed. Results: The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the total scale was 0.80 and for the five subscales ranged from 0.89-0.95; The test-test coefficient were from 0.67~0.82 for the subscales and was 0.57 for the total scale. The mean inter-item correlation coefficient for the total scale was 0.11, and for the five subscales ranged from 0.50-0.69. Indices of confirmatory factor analysis were χ²/df(5.777),RMSEA(0.095), CFI(0.924), NFI(0.910), TLI(0.905), which indicated that the construct validity was acceptable. The breast cancer patients and healthy women had significant differences in neuroticism, agreeableness and openness. Conclusion:CBF-PI-B has good reliability, and acceptable validity, which confirms that it's a reliable and valid assessment of personality in Chinese female patients with breast cancer.

基金项目：

国家科技支撑计划(2009BAI77B06)

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 宁南，杨艳杰，邱晓惠，等. 乳腺癌症患者大五人格与幸福感指数关系. 中国公共卫生，2012，28(7)：956-957
2 杨智辉，王建平. 癌症患者人格类型及其与应对策略，社会支持的关系. 心理学探新，2007，27(2)：88-90
3 Cardenal V, Cerezo MV, Martínez J, et al. Personality, emo-tions and coping styles: Predictive value for the evolutionof cancer patients. The Spanish Journal of Psychology,2012, 15(2): 756-767
4 陈湛惜，麦校卫，王志海，等. 人格个性因素对癌症患者疼痛行为和情感障碍的影响. 中国临床神经科学，2008，16(1)：71-79
5 王若雨，姜潮，刘启贵，等. 乳腺癌术后患者人格与生存质量的相关分析. 中国临床康复，2002，6(24)：3645-3646
6 王孟成，戴晓阳，姚树桥. 中国大五人格问卷的初步编制Ⅰ：理论框架与信度分析. 中国临床心理学杂志，2010，18(5)：545-548
7 王孟成，戴晓阳，姚树桥. 中国大五人格问卷的初步编制Ⅱ：效度分析. 中国临床心理学杂志，2010，18(6)：687-690
8 王孟成，戴晓阳，姚树桥. 中国大五人格问卷的初步编制—简氏版的制定及信效度检验．中国临床心理学杂志，2011，19(4)：454-457
9 Briggs SR, Cheek JM. The role of factor analysis in the de-velopment and evaluation of personality scales. Journal ofPersonality, 1986, 54(1): 106-148
10 Rushton JP, Irwing P. A general factor of personality (GFP)from two meta-analyses of the big five: Digman(1997) andMount, Barrick, Scullen, and Rounds(2005). Personality andIndividual Differences, 2008, 45(7): 679-683
11 van der Steeg AFW, De Vries J, Roukema JA. Anxious per-sonality and breast cancer: Possible negative impact onquality of life after breast-conserving therapy. World Jour-nal of Surgery, 2010, 34(7): 1453-1460
12 Wang Z, Sakakibara T, Kasai Y, et al. Personality of pat-ients with malignant tumors: A cross-sectional study. WorldJournal of Surgical Oncology，2012, 10(1): 187
13 程海萍. 西宁地区妇女宫颈癌患者的 C 型行为研究. 中国健康心理学杂志，2008，16(8)：951-952

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】