中国临床心理学杂志

青少年健康危险行为的潜结构的Taxometric分析

作者：王孟成¹ 2 任芬³ 4 张建新³ 姚树桥²

单位：1. 广州大学心理与脑科学研究中心广州 510006
2. 中南大学湘雅二医院医学心理学研究所长沙 410011
3. 中国科学院心理研究所心理健康重点实验室北京 100101
4. 中国科学院研究生院北京 100039

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2013,21(5):779-782

摘要：

目的：青少年健康相关危险行为会对其当前和今后的生活产生不可预计的影响,探明危险行为的潜在结构属性对其临床诊断和干预有重要的意义。方法：研究样本3226人来自4个不同城市,采用Taxometric分析法中的三种程序(MAMBAC、MAXEIG和L-Mode)对青少年健康相关危险行为问题的潜在结构进行分析。根据直观的图形和客观的CCFI指标对结果进行判定。结果：MAMBAC图形显示结果支持维度结构,而CCFI为0.53,落在模糊区间0.4-0.6内;MAXEIG图形显示支持维度结构,CCFI为0.39,落在模糊区间附近;L-Mode图形支持维度结构,CCFI为0.53,落在模糊区间内。结论：综合3种程序的图形和CCFI指标,青少年健康相关危险行为问题的潜在结构更有可能是维度的而不是类别的。

Objective: Researchers have increasingly suggested that adolescents with risky behavior may suffer more in the uncertain future. Detecting the latent structure of the adolescent health related risky behavior is important for clinical diagnosis and intervention. Methods: Responses were obtained from a large sample(n=3226; 45.87% girls) unselected with regard to convenience, comprising common junior and senior students from four cities of China. MAXEIG, MAMBAC, and L-Mode were performed with indicator sets drawn from Adolescent Health Related Risky Behavior Inventory. Assessments also included objective Comparison Curve Fit Indices. Results: The plots of the three procedures supported the dimensional construct, and the CCFIs of the procedures were 0.53\0.38\0.53 respectively. Conclusion: Results yield converging evidence that adolescent health related risky behavior has a dimensional latent structure.

基金项目：

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 Sawyer SM, Afifi RA, Bearinger LH, et al. Adolescence: Afoundation for future health. The Lancet, 2012, 379: 1630-1640
2 季成叶. 青少年健康危险行为. 中国学校卫生，2007，28：289-291
3 孙江平，宋逸，马迎华，等. 中国 5 省市中学生危险行为调查报告 ( 三 )：吸烟、饮酒和成瘾类药物滥用状况. 中国学校卫生，2001，22：396-398
4 Emery RE, Waldron, MC, Kitzmann KM, et al. Delinquentbehavior, future divorce, ornonmarital childbearing, and ex-ternalizing behavior among offspring: A 14-year prospectivestudy. Journal of Family Psychology, 1999, 13: 1-12
5 Markey CN, Markey PM, Tinsley BJ. Personality, puberty,and preadolescent girls'risky behaviors: Examining thepredictive value of the fivefactor model of personality.Journal of Research in Personality, 2003, 37: 405-419
6 McGue M, Iacono WG. The association of early adolescentproblem behavior with adult psychopathology. AmericanJournal of Psychiatry, 2005, 162(6): 1118-1124
7 Meehl PE, Yonce LJ. Taxometric analysis: I. Detecting tax-onicity with two quantitative indicators using means aboveand below a sliding cut (MAMBAC procedure). Psychologi-cal Reports, 1994, 74: 1059-1274
8 Ruscio J, Walters GD, Marcus DK, et al. Comparing the re-lative fit of categorical and dimensional latent variablemodels using consistency tests. Psychological Assessment,2010, 22: 5-21
9 Lubke G, Tueller S. Latent class detection and class assign-ment: A comparison of the MAXEIG taxometric procedureand factor mixture modeling approaches. Structural EquationModeling, 2010, 17: 605-628
10 Ruscio J. Taxometric analysis: An empirically grounded ap-proach to implementing the method. Criminal Justice andBehavior, 2007, 34: 1588-1622
11 Ruscio J, Haslam N, Ruscio AM. Introduction to the taxo-metric method: A practical guide. Mahwah, NJ: LawrenceErlbaum Associates, Inc, 2006
12 Walters GD, McGrath RE, Knight RA. Taxometrics, polyto-mous constructs, and the comparison curve fit index: AMonte Carlo analysis. Psychological Assessment, 2010, 22:149-156
13 王孟成，蚁金瑶，姚树桥，等. 青少年健康相关危险行为问卷的编制及信效度检验. 中国心理卫生，2012，26：287-292
14 Waller NG, Meehl PE. Multivariate taxometric procedures:Distinguishing types from continua. Newbury Park, CA:Sage, 1998
15 Beach SRH, Amir N, BauJJ. Can sample specific simula-tions help detect low base-rate taxonicity? PsychologicalAssessment, 2005, 17: 446-461
16 Ruscio AM. The latent structure of social anxiety disorder:Consequences of shifting to a dimensional diagnosis. Journ-al of Abnormal Psychology, 2010, 119: 662-671
17 Ruscio J, Kaczetow W. Differentiating categories and dim-ensions: Evaluating the robustness of taxometric analyses.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2009, 44: 259-280
18 Ruscio J, Marcus DK. Detecting small taxa using simulatedcomparison data: A reanalysis of Beach, Amir, and Bau's(2005) data. Psychological Assessment, 2007, 19:241-246
19 Ruscio AM, Ruscio J, Keane TM. The latent structure ofpost-traumatic stress disorder: A taxometric investigation ofreactions to extreme stress. Journal of Abnormal Psycholo-gy, 2002, 111: 290-301
20 Anokhin AP, Golosheykin S, Grant J, et al. Heritability ofrisk-taking in adolescence: A longitudinal twin study. TwinResearch and Human Genetics, 2009, 12: 366-371
21 Bartels M, Hudziak JJ, van den Oord, et al. Co-occurrenceof aggressive behavior and rule-breaking behavior at age12: Multi-rater analyses. Behavior Genetics, 2003, 33: 607-621
22 Eaves LJ, Rutter M, Silberg JL, et al. Genetic and environ-mental causes of covariation in interview assessments ofdisruptive behavior in child and adolescent twins. BehaviorGenetics, 2000, 30: 321-334
23 Legrand LN, Keyes M, McGue M, et al. Rural environm-ents reduce the genetic intuence on adolescent substanceuse and rule-breaking behavior. Psychological Medicine,2008, 38: 1341-1350
24 Rende R, Slomkowski C. Incorporating the family as a criti-cal context in genetic studies of children: Implications forunderstanding pathways to risky behavior and uubstanceuse. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 2009, 34: 606-616

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】